Well A if someone else is going to pay for your insurance it ain't hard to get people to sign up. 83 per cent of obamacare enrollees get subsidies and many get a full free ride. Your calculus seems to be as long as more people have ins it doesn't matter who is hurt by having to,pay for it. Inotherwords reality has has no business sharing space with your utopian vision.
Flopper you seem to believe that anything is better than nothing. I am not against a insurance plan I am just against obamacare. Let me put in in a sound bite. Less insurance for more money. And everyone says the chickens are just beginning to come home to roost as the full effect of the plan come into play.
Stay tuned for shrimpbox'a health care plan available soon
For those that have little income, Obamacare is certainly not less insurance for more money. Upper income families pay more and lower income families pay less. If we are to insure more people, someone has to pay more. It certainly can't be the poor.
Ah Flopper you have trapped yourself. Obamacare promised to insure thirty million more people with no increase in costs. You have commonsensically noted that if you are going to have to insure more people someone will have to pay more, and you opine it certainly can't be the poor. First let's remember what I have posted earlier, that having insurance does not promote healthier behavior and therefore does not reduce costs(are you listening Arian?). Let's also add to the mix that obamacare threw 11 million middle class people into poverty. Now Flopper reasons we can't possibly ask the poor to pay for health insurance so we must. Ok I guess we can't get the poor to pay for their own food, their own housing, their own phones, their own anything by your logic. Therefore the "poor" can now expect themselves to be entitled to basically anything they want. So how do I game this. I just quit working, at least above board, and say that I am poor. I will get everything for free not because I deserve it but because I will be categorized as poor. This is not a system that has any chance of longevity because of huge cost overruns. It will fail and people like you Flopper will blame the haves for not doing their duty and the extremely comfortable poor will be laughing all the way to the welfare office.
And A let me assist you with how the costs of obamacare are being passed along. With yearly sometimes double digit increase in my insurance costs. I now pay more for health care than I ever paid for a mortgage.
On a more positive note, my grandson recently came up with a great way to make food stamps more efficient. Have all food stamp recipients have to have their food stamp purchases approved by minders in the grocery stores. This could also be achieved by computers that would track food stamp purchases by each individual to see if they were buying the healthiest and most economical foods. Those that weren't would have to go to food counseling.
50 percent of food stamp increases are going to Latinos, both legal and illegal.
The amount of people receiving food stamps is equal to the people considered to be living below the poverty level, 46 million.
Food stamps have not decreased even as the economy has improved, yet liberals think a 5 percent reduction is criminal. They will never think any reduction is justified, that there can never be a reduction in the welfare state, and therefore liberals can never work bipartisanly to reduce the debt.
Receiving govt assistance has now become a career path.
And let me help some of you dogooders with some facts. We actually have employees that would rather buy their bag of pot than pay rent. So please explain to me why I have to support this behavior and what govt program is going to,change this behavior.
I also see people using food stamps and going to food banks that are not in any way poor.
Health care. if you claim to,have nothing you get everything. If you have anything, you get nothing.