Do you support Muslims emigrating to the U.S.?

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If it’s only 25% then it’s scary

Who said it was 25%?

Blanket policies on religions violates the 1st Amendment.

 

[Failzero]

Who said it was 25%?

Blanket policies on religions violates the 1st Amendment.

You think it’s a higher % too ?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You think it’s a higher % too ?

Irrelevant to the discussion.

 

[Stryder50]

What part of religious discrimination do you not get in that tiny mind of yours?

It is not a rule, despite all your superfluous arguments.

If a religion violates basic human rights, personal liberties, and promotes discord and violence against governments and persons that don't submit to it's dogma, than it isn't the sort of religion that the First Amendment was meant to protect.
It deserves discrimination.
National Socialism (NSDAP) = Nazis of German had many characteristics of religion. Many Nazis saw it as a religion. You think it shouldn't have been discriminated against ?

 

[Failzero]

Irrelevant to the discussion.

Like the recent rising %s of Tranny Mass Shooters

 

[Stryder50]

Islam’s opinion is that all infidels should convert to Islam, and that it’s OK to lie to get people to do it.

That's it's dogma and scripture.
Many infidels don't want to believe that though.

 

[The Duke]

I am not defending anything, You are attacking many Muslim people who are not radicalized and do not subscribe to your interpretation of their religion.

I am alive today because of Muslims. The head of surgery at my transplant hospital is Muslim. He is one of the nicest human beings I have ever met. He is Syrian and educated in Great Britain. The surgeon who did my transplant was born in Iran. At one time, my endocrinologist was Egyptian.

I have had doctors from all over the world. A cardiologist from Japan, an oncologist from India, and transplant doctors from Pakistan and India, plus many more born right here in the good old USA. I would not discriminate against any of them because of their religious beliefs because they are good people and treated me well.

Your mileage may vary but I do not ascribe to your characterization. Bigots are going to bigot all day long.

Islam is a world domination plan masquerading as a religion. It caters to man's most depraved desires and is evil.
It was formed from an Arab's sexual desires and lust for power. ("Mohammed") The Pedo Conqueror.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If a religion violates basic human rights, personal liberties, and promotes discord and violence against governments and persons that don't submit to it's dogma, than it isn't the sort of religion that the First Amendment was meant to protect.
It deserves discrimination.
National Socialism (NSDAP) = Nazis of German had many characteristics of religion. Many Nazis saw it as a religion. You think it shouldn't have been discriminated against ?

Until they violate the law, everyone is presumed innocent.

Before WwIi, Nazis were not restricted from immigration because you could not identify them as such. It is just like identifying Muslims. If you looked someone you cannot tell their religious belief or politics.

Tell me what part of religious discrimination is valid.

 

[Stryder50]

Until they violate the law, everyone is presumed innocent.

Before WwIi, Nazis were not restricted from immigration because you could not identify them as such. It is just like identifying Muslims. If you looked someone you cannot tell their religious belief or politics.

Tell me what part of religious discrimination is valid.

I just did in the first sentence of my post you quoted.

Also when it(dogma of the religion) is taken literally and applied by fundamentalist members;

Bin Laden's Letter To America 2002 - Archive.org​

Letter to the American People - Wikipedia​

&

(Fully Translated) - DNI​

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Islam is a world domination plan masquerading as a religion. It caters to man's most depraved desires and is evil.

Again for about the 10th time in this thread, your personal opinion does not overcome the protections of the 1st Amendment.

Can you explain your position in regards to how religious discrimination is allowed in regard to immigration?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Legions Of Brain Washed Cowards Loving Ignore Rejecting Censorship Yet Incapable Of Attending To Direct Reasoning "

* Standard Of Allegiance To Sectarian Supremacist Ultimatums And Not To Foundations For Independence Of The Individual *

What part of religious discrimination do you not get in that tiny mind of yours?
It is not a rule, despite all your superfluous arguments.

There is not a difference between edicts and tenets of a creed and a religion , and there is not an exception for a creed , as a religion , that includes edicts or tenets of creed to violate principles of non violence ; that is the standard for creed which is religion .

The principles of non violence define violence as illegitimate aggression , and provide that self defense against violence is legitimate aggression ; obviously , a definition of illegitimate aggression is required .

The principles of individualism define violence as illegitimate aggression that deprives an individual of either self ownership or self determination , where self ownership entitles an individual to free roam , to free association and to determine progeny and where self ownership entitles an individual to own private property and to exercise willful intents through social civil contracts made valid through informed consent .

An individual can not surrender self ownership , so as to settle debts of self determination , which means enslavement is not allowed .

The standards for independence of the individual are based on equal protection of negative liberties among individuals , where illegitimate aggression against safety or security of another individual must be valid , and whether an individual may be a citizen , or a collective of individuals such as an incorporate , or a state , or a federate , or a litigant .

* Eye I Slam A Phobia Ta We Hid Call It Fate International Allegiance *

. Pan-Islamism - Wikipedia .
Pan-Islamism (Arabic: الوحدة الإسلامية, romanized: al-Waḥdat al-Islāmiyya) is a political movement which advocates the unity of Muslims under one Islamic state, often a caliphate[1] or an international organization with Islamic principles.

Pan-Islamism differentiates itself from pan-nationalistic ideologies, for example Pan-Arabism, by focusing on religion and not ethnicity and race. It sees the ummah (Muslim community) as the focus of allegiance and mobilization, including the Tawhid belief by the guidance of Quran and Sunnah's teachings.

 

[Failzero]

Again for about the 10th time in this thread, your personal opinion does not overcome the protections of the 1st Amendment.

Can you explain your position in regards to how religious discrimination is allowed in regard to immigration?

1st amendment is not a suicide pact

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Admiral Rock In A Well Begging Questions As Do Cowards Indulging Private And Wanting Government Censorship "

* Religious Reich Fundamentalism Contesting Only Sectarian Supremacy Not Histrionics About Morality *

1st amendment is not a suicide pact

Perhaps be cautious as admire all rock in a well may be all in and inviting for the moral fundamentalism of the sectarian supremacists for fictional ishmaelism .

It is obvious that admire all rock in a well is all on board with censorship , as a petty option to relegate all answers , especially those that cut to the quick , as worthless and should be on ignore , which is pathetic and disgraceful .

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

1st amendment is not a suicide pact

STFU and grow a brain. If you can't counter my argument, suck it up, be an adult and move on!

 

[Failzero]

STFU and grow a brain. If you can't counter my argument, suck it up, be an adult and move on!

You need to see a Dentist pronto

 

[Failzero]

" Admiral Rock In A Well Begging Questions As Do Cowards Indulging Private And Wanting Government Censorship "

* Religious Reich Fundamentalism Contesting Only Sectarian Supremacy Not Histrionics About Morality *

Perhaps be cautious as admire all rock in a well may be all in and inviting for the moral fundamentalism of the sectarian supremacists for fictional ishmaelism .

It is obvious that admire all rock in a well is all on board with censorship , as a petty option to relegate all answers , especially those that cut to the quick , as worthless and should be on ignore , which is pathetic and disgraceful .

I’m not sure about all of that , but his end game is fluid

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You need to see a Dentist pronto

Have you been screened for signs of a strike recently? That makes no sense.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

" Admiral Rock In A Well Begging Questions As Do Cowards Indulging Private And Wanting Government Censorship "

* Religious Reich Fundamentalism Contesting Only Sectarian Supremacy Not Histrionics About Morality *

Perhaps be cautious as admire all rock in a well may be all in and inviting for the moral fundamentalism of the sectarian supremacists for fictional ishmaelism .

It is obvious that admire all rock in a well is all on board with censorship , as a petty option to relegate all answers , especially those that cut to the quick , as worthless and should be on ignore , which is pathetic and disgraceful .

That post makes about as much sense as a Swiss cheese condom!

 

[Votto]

You should seek mental health counseling. You used to be a reasonable poster, but you jumped the tracks a few months ago. Your hatred is consuming you. Better get help!

Nazism was a cult which is why they had the Hitler Youth to mold the minds of the future generations.

To not see this is astounding. To question my mental well-being as a response is just sad and pathetic.

 

[Kondor3]

No.

Not until Muslim countries have reciprocal agreements with the US regarding immigration, freedom of speech and religion, etc.

Islam is incompatible with Western culture and philosophy and religion and democracy and governance.

Hopelessly incompatible... there is no remedy... the chasm cannot be breached.

They band-together and keep quiet until they have a voting majority and then they start pushing Sharia.

And their religion tells them that it's OK to make war and die for The Faith or to defend the Faithful.

And any-ol'-streetcorner-mullah gets to declare Jihad or Fatwa and the Sheeple blindly follow and obey.

Philosophically they are simple-minded disingenuous religious plagiarists born in the wrong century.

The West - and certainly the US - does not need such troublesome people.

To admit them into the West in large numbers is to admit a viper into our midst.

No thank you.

I have nothing against them and wish them well so long as they stay on their own side of the fence.