Do you believe the "motorized paraglider" part of 10/7?

Then demonstrate it for us... instead of pushing the latest Mossad BS video....
No. You’ve had evidence presented to you time and time again. And you simply ignore it.

It was NAILED, above, by Yarddog.

 
No. You’ve had evidence presented to you time and time again. And you simply ignore it.

It was NAILED, above, by Yarddog.




The only thing the Zionist attempt to prove the motorized paraglider bullshit of 107 has "nailed" is a nail in the coffin of Felix Baumgartner
 
and yet here you are too cowardly to fly a motorized paraglider yourself...

**** you and your red herrings. I don’t fly. I have no license.
And in the practice of law, aren't past instances of lying about the same thing admitted as evidence in cases???
Sometimes they are. But, like most of the ignorance you spew, you don’t grasp that different factual scenarios (etc.) call for different outcomes.
 
**** you and your red herrings. I don’t fly. I have no license.

Sometimes they are. But, like most of the ignorance you spew, you don’t grasp that different factual scenarios (etc.) call for different outcomes.


And the "different factual scenarios" are


Israel lied about being attacked in 67 as an excuse for a planned invasion/extermination/land grab
Israel lied about 107 as an excuse for a planned invasion/extermination/land grab


That's really really a huge difference there, rabbi...
 
And the "different factual scenarios" are


Israel lied about being attacked in 67 as an excuse for a planned invasion/extermination/land grab
Israel lied about 107 as an excuse for a planned invasion/extermination/land grab


That's really really a huge difference there, rabbi...
🥱

In your tiny mind, you call that “logic.” It isn’t.

For, even if Israel lied in 1967, that doesn’t mean that Hamas don’t commit the October 7 atrocities.

Even in the eyes of the law (which you brought up above), a juror is entitled to consider a witness’s testimony as being entirely a lie if that witness is found to have lied on just one matter.

BUT that ^ legal principle that permits this (usually given to the jury during instructions from the judge after the presentment of evidence is concluded) ALSO gives the jury to right to accept as true ever other word delivered by that witness.

It’s a Latin phrase which even a dope like you can look up: “falsis in uno.”
 
For, even if Israel lied in 1967, that doesn’t mean that Hamas don’t commit the October 7 atrocities.


correct, but it establishes a "pattern of behavior"



a juror is entitled to consider a witness’s testimony as being entirely a lie if that witness is found to have lied on just one matter.


That too, the "juror" is entitled to conclude Israel lies about this stuff, and has in the past, and that it is very very much what the Jewish holy book celebrates, a series of completely unprovoked attacks/exterminations/land grabs in Exodus under the guise of "Gawd's will"
 
correct, but it establishes a "pattern of behavior"
In many cases, a prosecutors isn’t even allowed to introduce evidence of a witness’s past “crimes” etc., on the principle that a fair-minded jury should never assume that he (particularly a defendant) has a “propensity.”

Rather, as to defendants, the law prefers that he be judged on the evidence eir the lack of evidence. Lack of evidence. That’s where you fall apart.
That too, the "juror" is entitled to conclude Israel lies about this stuff, and has in the past, and that it is very very much what the Jewish holy book celebrates, a series of completely unprovoked attacks/exterminations/land grabs in Exodus under the guise of "Gawd's will"
Everybody lies at some point this is already known.

The balance of your continuing screed is just your ceaseless anti Semitism.
 
Last edited:
That's like asking why so many are publicly for opening the Epstein files yet neither side does it.

It would be quite easy to demonstrate why there should either be a serious Federal Warning or a ban. But to admit that truth is to admit 107 is bullshit, and in the Congress, the AIPAC funding matters, America doesn't.

It would be quite easy to demonstrate why there should either be a serious Federal Warning or a ban.

So do it.
 
Earlier on 108 on RAV they interviewed a church leader in Nazareth...

Yeah, we're locked down, can't leave, terror attack.

Were you hit?

NO WE HAD A QUIET NIGHT HERE

You never said, how many Gaza rockets have ever hit Nazareth?
 
The balance of your continuing screed is just your ceaseless anti Semitism.


Care to specifically explain what is wrong with that. What happens in Exodus?

A: the Israelites attack/land grab/exterminate one Canaan city/state after another

True or False?
 
You never said, how many Gaza rockets have ever hit Nazareth?


To believe that Nazareth had a "quiet night" while an alleged 1200 rockets were fired from Gaza into Israel requires IQ<5.


Israel Large Color Map



 
It would be quite easy to demonstrate why there should either be a serious Federal Warning or a ban.

So do it.



How many in Congress will admit 107 was hate hoaxed fraud?
 
To believe that Nazareth had a "quiet night" while an alleged 1200 rockets were fired from Gaza into Israel requires IQ<5.


Israel Large Color Map



you don't know much about either geography or what happened on Oct 7. This question typifies your ignorance -- you keep asking it like it means something, but had you ever been in the area you would know just how silly this question is. When rockets are fired in Manhattan, you don't see them (or hear them) in Peekskill.
 
15th post
you don't know much about either geography or what happened on Oct 7.


I know exactly what happened. Netanyahu had his allies in IDF fire four rockets at the homes of "two state solution" supporters and hate hoaxed it. There was no motorized paraglider attack, no unmarked van of "Hamas and hostages" getting through the Israel/Gaza checkpoint, the homes in Israel are not devoid of guns, and Israel is a "fortress" as Charlie Kirk said.


ISRAEL offed Charlie Kirk because he noticed more about 107 than he was supposed to notice. All of the traitors who have been to Israel 100 times like JASON MIYARES noticed it too, that there is no way a "van" got through the checkpoint, and kept quiet because they are all treasonous Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist Traitors.
 
I know exactly what happened. Netanyahu had his allies in IDF fire four rockets at the homes of "two state solution" supporters and hate hoaxed it. There was no motorized paraglider attack, no unmarked van of "Hamas and hostages" getting through the Israel/Gaza checkpoint, the homes in Israel are not devoid of guns, and Israel is a "fortress" as Charlie Kirk said.


ISRAEL offed Charlie Kirk because he noticed more about 107 than he was supposed to notice. All of the traitors who have been to Israel 100 times like JASON MIYARES noticed it too, that there is no way a "van" got through the checkpoint, and kept quiet because they are all treasonous Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist Traitors.
and what color is the sky in your world?
 
Back
Top Bottom