Do Liberals Want to Increase the Chances of More Terrorist Attacks in the U.S.?

[NYcarbineer]

I don't believe liberals "want" to increase the odds of another attack.
I do think however they want to see our western culture further eroded, and because of that will always want to see more Muslims as well as other non-western cultures come here.
Remember, they are multiculturalists who believe homogeneous societies are evil because they become too strong, and that's just not fair.

I'm split on this.

The left wants to end America. That is the sad fact,. The end game for the left is the revocation of the Constitution and the imposition of a command economy in an authoritarian state, similar to Germany, where speech against politically powerful groups will land you in prison.

Islam is a very destructive force against America, so the democrats have made an ally of Islam in their fight to destroy the USA. Do they want Americans dead? Perhaps not, but they sure don't mind dead Americans, provided the goals of the party are furthered.

Good meltdown. A bit verbose though.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Good meltdown. A bit verbose though.

You do have that pithy phase that explains all - "Allahu Akbar."

But whatchagunnado?

 

[mudwhistle]

I'm not gonna reply by linking to the OP, because it is too large.....

....But.


Muslims don't think the way we do. They consider our freedoms to be a weakness. They will never become Americans just by moving here because they don't respect our society. They think that too much freedom is a distinct disadvantage in preventing enemy infiltration. I have been told straight up by Muslims that our freedoms will be our downfall. They've been brainwashed into thinking that America is ripe for a fall and it's only a matter of time. I was told this back in the 90s, and it is the primary goal of Islam....to bring us down.

 

[guno]

Recent history should inform any rational person that the more Muslims you have in a non-Muslim country, the greater chances you have that terrorist attacks will occur in that nation. This fact would seem to be so self-evidently true and absolutely proven that no sane person would dispute it.

Yet, now we have Obama asking if Republicans are afraid of "widows and orphans" because they oppose allowing thousands of Syrian refugees to enter America. Given this shameful demagoguery and other jaw-dropping rhetoric coming from the left on this issue, many are left to wonder if American liberals really don't care if they increase the chances of another terrorist attack on American soil.

By the way, some Muslim "widows and orphans" have committed terrorist attacks. Even liberal activist and TV talk-show star Bill Maher recently admitted that a sizable percentage of "mainstream Muslims" agree with radical Islam on some issues. Some of the terrorists who attacked the Charlie Hebdo magazine's HQ were Muslims who had lived in France for several years and who, according to witnesses, spoke "perfect French." Yesterday, thousands of Muslims at a soccer match in Turkey could be heard booing and shouting "Allah hu Akbar" during a moment of silence intended to honor the victims of the Paris terrorist attacks. Sickening, but revealing.

Guess which major non-Muslim country has had zero Muslim terrorist attacks? Japan. Why is that? Because Japan is virtually closed to Muslim immigration and has only a few thousand Muslims within its borders.

Do liberals just have no idea what Muslim immigrants have done in Europe, and also here in America? Here are some articles and videos on the topic:

French Islamist mini-states grow into problem out of government control (Liberal news outlets have sought to "debunk" the reports about virtual Islamic mini-states in France and England and other European nations, but read this article and the ones below, and also the videos below, for the facts on the matter.)

France’s ethnic apartheid: 'Separate Islamic societies' breed discontent, radicalism - Washington Times

Sharia law in the West (This page, authored by a liberal, pro-Israeli Irishman, includes dozens of news links on cases of Muslims seeking to impose, or imposing, Sharia law in Europe.)

The shocking reality of 'no-go' zones: France has no control over Muslim-populated neighborhoods - Europe - International - News - Catholic Online

The Islamization of Belgium and the Netherlands in 2013

Europe's Mujahideen: Where Mass Immigration Meets Global Terrorism

Muslim woman fighting Sharia law in Europe

Europe: Islamic Fundamentalism is Widespread

UK's First Female Sharia Judge: 'We Can't Ask Muslims Not to Have More than One Wife' - Breitbart

Boris Johnson: 'Sharia law in the UK is absolutely unacceptable'











Is Shariah Law coming to America? If this video doesn't WAKE YOU UP, nothing will!!

Muslim Cleric Says, "The Flag Of Islam Will One Day Fly Over The White House!"

David Horowitz Chilling Exchange With Muslim Student

Sound like the screed the rightwing christers used back in the 30's against letting Jews into this country

Some of the most filthy lies against them

During the 1930s and 1940s, right-wing demagogues linked the Depression of the 1930s, the New Deal, President Franklin Roosevelt, and the threat of war in Europe to the machinations of an imagined international Jewish conspiracy that was both communist and capitalist. A new ideology appeared which accused "the Jews" of dominating Franklin Roosevelt’s administration, of causing the Great Depression, and of dragging the US into WW2 against a new Germany which deserved nothing but admiration. Roosevelt's "New Deal" was derisively referred to as the "Jew Deal".

Father Charles Coughlin, a radio preacher, as well as many other prominent public figures, condemned "the Jews," and Henry Ford reprinted The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in his newspaper. Gerald L. K. Smith, a Disciples of Christ minister, was the founder (1937) of the Committee of One Million and publisher (beginning in 1942) of The Cross and the Flag, a magazine that declared that "Christian character is the basis of all real Americanism." Other antisemitic agitators included Fritz Julius Kuhn of the German-American Bund, William Dudley Pelley, and the Rev. Gerald Winrod.

In the end, promoters of antisemitism such as Coughlin, Smith, Kuhn and Winrod achieved no more than a passing popularity as the threat of Nazi Germany became more and more evident to the American electorate. Steven Roth asserts that there was never a real possibility of a "Jewish question" appearing on the American political agenda as it did in Europe; according to Roth, the resistance to political antisemitism in the United States was due to the heterogeneity of the American political structure

On November 20, 1938, two weeks after Kristallnacht, when Jews across Germany were attacked and killed, and Jewish businesses, homes and synagogues burned, Coughlin blamed the Jewish victims, saying that "Jewish persecution only followed after Christians first were persecuted." After this speech, and as his programs became more antisemitic, some radio stations, including those in New York and Chicago, began refusing to air his speeches without pre-approved scripts; in New York, his programs were cancelled by WINS and WMCA, leaving Coughlin to broadcasting on the Newark part-time station WHBI. This made Coughlin a hero in Nazi Germany, where papers ran headlines like: "America is Not Allowed to Hear the Truth."

On December 18, 1938 two thousand of Coughlin's followers marched in New York protesting potential asylum law changes that would allow more Jews (including refugees from Hitler's persecution) into the US, chanting, "Send Jews back where they came from in leaky boats!" and "Wait until Hitler comes over here!" The protests continued for several month

 

[NYcarbineer]

Yes of course liberals want to increase the chances of terrorist attacks, because more terrorist attacks here will weaken Obama,
and thus weaken the Democrats, and thus increase the likelihood that a warmongering Republican will get elected president.

lol, Seriously?

Sounds to me that increasing the likelihood for more attacks in the US would logically be something the Right would embrace.

So if anyone is trying for such a thing for political purposes....

....hmmmmmm......

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Hey, that meltdown! An oldie but a goodie.

I honestly believe that the Paris terror attack and the reaction of Obama and the dims has destroyed any small chance the democrats had at the White House.

Unfortunately, I think it just handed the White House to Donald Trump, and I am most assuredly not a Trump fan.

Democrats are used to sticking their finger in the air to see which way the wind is blowing. That's when they were a little bit smarter about politics. Today they don't seem to care what the people think and the results were obvious during the mid-term elections.

There is a silent killer out there which is the angry voter. Angry voters sit in silence until election day and then come out to vent their frustration. Those angry voters are the enemy of the Democrat party, and they don't seem to get it yet.

Between these refugees, the border problem, Hillary and her stunts as SOS, Obama and ISIS are going to come back to haunt them.