So America did nothing, jackass? You're actually going to claim that?
You must be one of those indoctrinated tards they've raised up to be useful idiots.
Soviets did 90% of the fighting? Really?
Team green did at least 40% of the fighting, dumbass.
I've witnessed the scars from it.
If you read carefully, I said the British did essentially nothing because they were never really successful.
I said the Soviets did 90% because we were not in most of the war, and the main fighting was on the eastern front.
But if you had read what I wrote, I said that the US was who did the remainder of the fighting.
And the US helped before entering the fight.
We gave the Soviets lots of P-39s, Grant tanks, Thompson machineguns, and most important were 100,000 Studebaker trucks the Soviets use to launch Katyushka rockets.
Read up more on the eastern front.
There were battles with more than a million men.
There are tank battles with 5000 tanks, and the western front only saw Tigers once, and was at Bastogne, and that was just 200 recalled temporarily to the western front.
{...
Over the next few months, Germany amassed over 500,000 men, 10,000 guns and mortars, 2,700 tanks and assault guns and 2,500 aircraft to mount an attack on the Kursk Bulge and take Kursk. But the Soviets knew something big was in the works and their war machine went into overdrive producing top-of-the-line tanks, artillery and aircraft.
The Red Army dug in and amassed a formidable arsenal which included almost 1,300,000 men, over 20,000 guns and mortars, 3,600 tanks, 2,650 aircraft and five reserve field armies of another half million men and 1,500 additional tanks.
At the north of the Kursk Bulge was Germany’s 9th Army, made up of three Panzer divisions and over 300,000 men; at the south was their 4th Panzer Army, also with over 300,000 men and a combination of Panther and Tiger tanks. To the west was Germany’s 2nd Army with around 110,000 men.
...}
