Did the FBI Tamper with the Frame Rate of the Jan 6 Pipe Bomb Footage?

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
22,765
44,344
2,290
It certainly does appear that way.

The FBI needs to be disbanded and a new much leaner organization founded in its place. Oh, and move the HQ far away from DC and its environs and then implode that ugly, ugly HQ.





More than a year has passed since the FBI last released footage of the pipe bomber who allegedly planted explosive devices near the DNC and RNC party headquarters the night before January 6, 2021.


The FBI has reportedly collected 39,000 video files relating to the suspect’s identity, according to Steven D’Antuono, assistant director in charge of the FBI’s Washington D.C. Field Office. Yet since September 8, 2021, not a single new video file has been released.


At Revolver, we have been focused on the two clips of video footage from DNC building security cameras that the FBI released on March 2021 and September 2021, respectively.


In August 2022, we definitively proved the DNC camera footage from the FBI’s September 2021 release should have captured the “money shot” of the pipe bomber taking the bomb out of the bag and planting it near a park bench in front of the DNC building. But for some reason, the FBI censored the tape so that the public could not see the alleged criminal walk back into the camera frame to commit the actual criminal act.


Over the past two months, we took a closer look at the DNC surveillance footage the FBI provided to the public. What we found was even more bizarre, and more damning than our initial discovery that the FBI is withholding critical footage of the pipe bomber actually planting the bomb.


The original “missing moneyshot” – reflecting the FBI’s deliberate censorship of the commission of the crime, effectively – is a red flag of such stunning proportions that it alone merits Congressional investigation under a GOP-led House commission on FBI malfeasance.


The new findings we are about to discuss, however, are so implausible, specific, and suspicious that we are compelled to demand that a future GOP-led commission subpoena and demand the exact chain of custody for the DNC surveillance tapes that the FBI released to the public.

Implausibly Low Frame Rate Suggests Possible Tampering



In our analysis of the DNC location surveillance footage provided by the FBI, we observed that the frame rate in the footage is so low that it barely exceeds 1 frame per second. We’ll explain the significance of this shortly, but first let’s cut straight to the factual findings.

Below, we show the final 13 seconds of the DNC security camera footage from the FBI’s September 2021 release. These are the 13 seconds during which the pipe bomber gets up from the DNC park bench and walks directly toward and past the security camera.

There are only 16 distinct frames in these 13 seconds, yielding an average frame rate of just 1.2 frames per second. This is so low that it is essentially “stop motion.

See for yourself:

...[/b]​

 
It wouldn't surprise me at all!

That's what Biden's Gestapo aka the FBI does, tamper and/or create false evidence and destroy real evidence.
 
I am a critic of the FBI especially in recent years. However I’m not sure what difference the frame rates makes here.
 
It certainly does appear that way.

The FBI needs to be disbanded and a new much leaner organization founded in its place. Oh, and move the HQ far away from DC and its environs and then implode that ugly, ugly HQ.


More than a year has passed since the FBI last released footage of the pipe bomber who allegedly planted explosive devices near the DNC and RNC party headquarters the night before January 6, 2021.​
The FBI has reportedly collected 39,000 video files relating to the suspect’s identity, according to Steven D’Antuono, assistant director in charge of the FBI’s Washington D.C. Field Office. Yet since September 8, 2021, not a single new video file has been released.​
At Revolver, we have been focused on the two clips of video footage from DNC building security cameras that the FBI released on March 2021 and September 2021, respectively.​
In August 2022, we definitively proved the DNC camera footage from the FBI’s September 2021 release should have captured the “money shot” of the pipe bomber taking the bomb out of the bag and planting it near a park bench in front of the DNC building. But for some reason, the FBI censored the tape so that the public could not see the alleged criminal walk back into the camera frame to commit the actual criminal act.​
Over the past two months, we took a closer look at the DNC surveillance footage the FBI provided to the public. What we found was even more bizarre, and more damning than our initial discovery that the FBI is withholding critical footage of the pipe bomber actually planting the bomb.​
The original “missing moneyshot” – reflecting the FBI’s deliberate censorship of the commission of the crime, effectively – is a red flag of such stunning proportions that it alone merits Congressional investigation under a GOP-led House commission on FBI malfeasance.​
The new findings we are about to discuss, however, are so implausible, specific, and suspicious that we are compelled to demand that a future GOP-led commission subpoena and demand the exact chain of custody for the DNC surveillance tapes that the FBI released to the public.
Implausibly Low Frame Rate Suggests Possible Tampering
In our analysis of the DNC location surveillance footage provided by the FBI, we observed that the frame rate in the footage is so low that it barely exceeds 1 frame per second. We’ll explain the significance of this shortly, but first let’s cut straight to the factual findings.​
Below, we show the final 13 seconds of the DNC security camera footage from the FBI’s September 2021 release. These are the 13 seconds during which the pipe bomber gets up from the DNC park bench and walks directly toward and past the security camera.​
There are only 16 distinct frames in these 13 seconds, yielding an average frame rate of just 1.2 frames per second. This is so low that it is essentially “stop motion.”​
See for yourself:​
...[/b]​


Dont DIYourself video forensics. Makes Revolver look dumb. They're PROBABLY entirely RIGHT about the frame rate -- but almost certain that this isn't because of "post-editing".

Video surveillance recording systems use complex analysis to DETERMINE what gets recorded. The costlier and more sophisticated they get -- the LESS you can say about frame rate differences.

They track moving objects -- even when they come to rest AND DETERMINE what frames NEED to be saved. They can also find FACES and bare skin and UP the resolution and/or frame rate of storage.

Tempest in a tiny playhouse teapot here.


But the STORY IS IMPORTANT. And so are the MISSING CAMERA angles that everyone knows exist. Missing as WELL in this story is any EVIDENCE that there IS ANY serious investigation. I think they got an answer and dont want the public to know. Same deal as Ray Epps.
 
Dont DIYourself video forensics. Makes Revolver look dumb. They're PROBABLY entirely RIGHT about the frame rate -- but almost certain that this isn't because of "post-editing".

Video surveillance recording systems use complex analysis to DETERMINE what gets recorded. The costlier and more sophisticated they get -- the LESS you can say about frame rate differences.

They track moving objects -- even when they come to rest AND DETERMINE what frames NEED to be saved. They can also find FACES and bare skin and UP the resolution and/or frame rate of storage.

Tempest in a tiny playhouse teapot here.


But the STORY IS IMPORTANT. And so are the MISSING CAMERA angles that everyone knows exist. Missing as WELL in this story is any EVIDENCE that there IS ANY serious investigation. I think they got an answer and dont want the public to know. Same deal as Ray Epps.
How about this guy? You would think he would have been arrested.

 
I am a critic of the FBI especially in recent years. However I’m not sure what difference the frame rates makes here.


Because at 1 per second you cannot recognize the face of the individual clearly.

Click the link in the OP to see what it looks like at your average gas station where they use a much higher frame rate and you can clearly recognize the individuals in those. I couldn't link the videos he has in the article.
 

Forum List

Back
Top