Grand jury stuff isn't going to give us any answers...it'll tell us what the probable cause was that got Epstein or Maxwell indicted.
It won't tell us who the other men were involved with the girls, it won't tell us who if anyone was blackmailed, it won't tell us if Epstein was a spy for a foreign country, or an asset for our Intel agencies....it won't tell us WHY a blind eye has been shown for him and his deviance....over the decades nor will it tell us about his suicide or murder.
It won't tell us jack doodle, Yidnar.....those answers will be in FBI files, the Epstein files, that the admin is refusing to release.
Yes.
It is very logical, isn't it.
A. The FBI knows more about this than anyone else
B. The FBI is known to destroy, alter, and fabricate evidence.
C. It just got busted doing exactly that. Matthew J Coleman, FBI forensic video expert, altered the Epstein prison tape that was released to the public. He did it on May 23 of this year, when Kash was already head of the FBI and Bondi already claimed she had the entirety of the FBI files.
D. Trump hasn't mentioned the Coleman issue yet, and neither has Kash or Bondi. The left doesn't seem to have latched on to it, and the right has no reason to belabor it. The only way we're going to understand the meaning of all this is to see the FBI file - including the unredacted Epstein prison video.
Therefore, you can expect...
That any FBI file that's released to us will be heavily redacted, and massaged to accommodate whatever reason was behind all this.
In my view, the FBI editing the prison video speaks volumes. It indicates there likely WAS some kind of blackmail or intelligence connection involved. I consider that the prison video is apolitical, unless the players have political significance. In other words, there would be no partisan political advantage to be gained by editing the prison video. Most likely it was something else - maybe it WAS a national security issue. Maybe MI6 did it, wouldn't that be embarrassing? lol
The only reasonable guess as to why the edit, is that there was a person involved - maybe an identifiable person. And, if the FBI felt the need to edit it out, it must mean they know who the person is. Kash must have blessed the edit, because he was in charge, and he wouldn't have done that without Trump's (at least tacit) approval. All this points strongly to a national security implication.
My guess is, if that's the case, then the FBI will stonewall us and claim national security if the case ever gets to court (or in front of Congress). They''ll start redacting the file all over again, and then claim they released as much as they could.
And all of this will leave the public believing there was a foreign power involved. And then the deep state will call it a conspiracy theory... (seeing a pattern here?
)
I think Trump needs to come clean on this one, or he's going to suffer. Transparency is one of the things he ran on, one of the things people expect of him. He COULD just come right out and say "it's a national security issue and we handled it and I won't talk about it". Ultimately that would be better for him rather than playing the usual set of deep state games.
My question is, when Kash turned over the video to Bondi, was it already edited at that time? Did Bondi know it was edited? Or conversely, did she order or request the edit?
www.cbsnews.com
. though I'm pretty confident that there is likely duplicate files or photos somewhere, to make certain it did not just disappear....but who really knows?
