That would be Trump and his minions.
Denmark is willing to discuss boosting security in Greenland with Trump
- Thread starter DonGlock26
- Start date
para bellum
Diamond Member
Typical TDS'er reply when you have nothing.
Greenland and U.S. Agree On Improved Cooperation at Thule Air Base
Greenland, Denmark and the U.S. conclude a new framework agreement surrounding the Thule Air Base (Pituffik), which in addition to reverting future maintenance contracts back to Greenlandic companies, promises closer economic and security ties and tangible economic benefits for Greenlanders.
Agreement Between The Government of the United States of America and The Government of the Kingdom of Denmark, Including the Home Rule Government of Greenland, To Amend and Supplement the Agreement of 27 April 1951 Pursuant to the North Atlantic Treaty Between The Government of the United States of America and The Government of the Kingdom of Denmark Concerning the Defense of Greenland (Defense Agreement) Including Relevant Subsequent Agreements Related Thereto
Technical Difficulties
2001-2009.state.gov
Generic SOFA applies as with all NATO member states.
The parties to the North Atlantic Treaty signed in Washington on 4 April, 1949, Considering that the forces of one Party may be sent, by arrangement, to serve in the territory of another Party;
Bearing in mind that the decision to send them and the conditions under which they will be sent, in so far as such conditions are not laid down by the present Agreement, will continue to be the subject of separate arrangements between the Parties concerned;
Desiring, however, to define the status of such forces while in the territory of another Party;
Have agreed as follows:
I don’t see anything about them wanting to be a US territory or why their security would demand it.Typical TDS'er reply when you have nothing.
Greenland and U.S. Agree On Improved Cooperation at Thule Air Base
Greenland, Denmark and the U.S. conclude a new framework agreement surrounding the Thule Air Base (Pituffik), which in addition to reverting future maintenance contracts back to Greenlandic companies, promises closer economic and security ties and tangible economic benefits for Greenlanders.www.highnorthnews.com
Agreement Between The Government of the United States of America and The Government of the Kingdom of Denmark, Including the Home Rule Government of Greenland, To Amend and Supplement the Agreement of 27 April 1951 Pursuant to the North Atlantic Treaty Between The Government of the United States of America and The Government of the Kingdom of Denmark Concerning the Defense of Greenland (Defense Agreement) Including Relevant Subsequent Agreements Related Thereto
Technical Difficulties
2001-2009.state.gov
Generic SOFA applies as with all NATO member states.
The parties to the North Atlantic Treaty signed in Washington on 4 April, 1949, Considering that the forces of one Party may be sent, by arrangement, to serve in the territory of another Party;
Bearing in mind that the decision to send them and the conditions under which they will be sent, in so far as such conditions are not laid down by the present Agreement, will continue to be the subject of separate arrangements between the Parties concerned;
Desiring, however, to define the status of such forces while in the territory of another Party;
Have agreed as follows:
para bellum
Diamond Member
I never said it did.
I am showing you the BILATERAL agreement with Denmark that you said does not exist.
Weasel
BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
A mere first step to negotiations for the sale of Greenland."Scoop: Denmark sent Trump team private messages on Greenland
Denmark sent private messages in recent days to President-elect Trump's team expressing willingness to discuss boosting security in Greenland or increasing the U.S. military presence on the island, two sources with knowledge of the issue tell Axios.
Why it matters: Trump's refusal to rule out military force to take control of Greenland was effectively a threat to invade a longstanding NATO ally. Those comments caught Copenhagen and many other European capitals off guard.
The big picture: Greenland (pop. 56,000) is largely autonomous, but Denmark maintains responsibility for defense.
Trump has repeatedly declared that controlling Greenland — the world's largest island — is necessary for U.S. national security vis-a-vis Russia and China. His son Don Jr. visited Greenland this week bearing MAGA hats."
Trump wins again. It's too much. I'm not sure if I can take anymore winning.
Seriously, Greenland needs to be secured as the Russians have become more active in the arctic.
Let the Chinese and/or Russians take it over and stop protecting it.
NATO protects it. Are you suggesting we quit the organization and leave Europe to Putin?
para bellum
Diamond Member
Loser
para bellum
Diamond Member
We have a significant part of our early warning radar at Thule.
Thule Site J - Wikipedia
dudmuck
Diamond Member
"Scoop: Denmark sent Trump team private messages on Greenland
Denmark sent private messages in recent days to President-elect Trump's team expressing willingness to discuss boosting security in Greenland or increasing the U.S. military presence on the island, two sources with knowledge of the issue tell Axios.
Why it matters: Trump's refusal to rule out military force to take control of Greenland was effectively a threat to invade a longstanding NATO ally. Those comments caught Copenhagen and many other European capitals off guard.
The big picture: Greenland (pop. 56,000) is largely autonomous, but Denmark maintains responsibility for defense.
Trump has repeatedly declared that controlling Greenland — the world's largest island — is necessary for U.S. national security vis-a-vis Russia and China. His son Don Jr. visited Greenland this week bearing MAGA hats."
Trump wins again. It's too much. I'm not sure if I can take anymore winning.
Seriously, Greenland needs to be secured as the Russians have become more active in the arctic.
DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 7,106
- 11,346
- 2,118
- Thread starter
- #73
Denmark boosts Arctic defence spending by $2.1 billion, responding to US pressure
Loading…
www.reuters.com
LAUGHatLEFTISTS
Diamond Member
- Jan 22, 2020
- 17,230
- 15,803
- 2,290
There really are no confirmation fights. It’s over before it begins.
- Apr 11, 2023
- 43,577
- 21,253
- 2,488
Gaetz is gone. It was 50 50 on Hegseth. It will be very hard of Kennedy and Gabbard.
MAGA Republicans are sheep!
trump uses that as an excuse. He is slowly moving the US to becoming a Russian ally. MAGA likes that. They lust for Poootin.
luiza
Diamond Member
The Chabad unites these two Jewish "terrorists".
Both for pragmatic reasons but one also for patriotic ones .
What MAGA does , or , does not like , is irrelevant , providing the fundamental long term strategy is being successfully followed .
Your last sentence is just silly .
He shouldn’t have the solo say in that.
DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 7,106
- 11,346
- 2,118
- Thread starter
- #80
What do you mean?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
Would you buy this Electric truck? 5 passengers and 350 miles range- Started by Robert W
- Replies: 15
-
Trump Administration reaches settlement in Ashli Babbitt case- Started by DigitalDrifter
- Replies: 12
-
