Dems Force Witness to Testify for Over Ten Hours

[bodecea]

Grow a pair, buttercup.

It proves they have nothing and are trying to set her up for a perjury trap, so **** you you heydrich loving asshole.

Or.....that she had a lot to share.

You silly people have been saying that for three years....guess what. You're wrong, yet again.

Do tell.

 

[bodecea]

Grow a pair, buttercup.

It proves they have nothing and are trying to set her up for a perjury trap, so **** you you heydrich loving asshole.

Or.....that she had a lot to share.

You silly people have been saying that ffg or three years....guess what. You're wrong, yet again.

When it gets to 7 years, then you can complain. As it will be longer than the Whitewater investigation.

Until then, you set the tune, you'll dance to it.

Wrong, cupcake, you silly people have set the tone, and karma is coming for you.

"silly" people.......

 

[bodecea]

The only word to describe this is brutality.

<< Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe
>>

Former Trump Russia adviser Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe

Can you quote “forced” or similar in the article?

if not, you’ll have to admit the only word to describe your thread is stupid.

Exactly.

She was a willing witness and from what I have heard, devastating g to Trump

Thus the meltdown by certain posters.

 

[bodecea]

The only word to describe this is brutality.

<< Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe
>>

Former Trump Russia adviser Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe

Since when is The Government allowed to Brow Beat a so called witness like this who has committed no crimes?
Was she even allowed to have a lawyer present? Was the White House allowed to listen to her testimony?

These Secret Hearings are disgusting and this has never been done in The History of The United States.

"brow beat", Comrade?

 

[bodecea]

These SECRET hearings the dems are holding for their SHAM impeachment inquiry would NEVER HOLD UP IN A COURT OF LAW. EVERYTHING they are doing is POLITICAL THEATER... for LEAKS... to DAMAGE the president.

How are they supposed to hold up in a court of law? Explain that some more for us, dear boy.

 

[bodecea]

Why ten hours? Sounds like they're brow beating the witness.

Whatever for? She wasn't even working at the Wh at the time of the call. He too has not one damn bit of firsthand information.


Latest Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’ Fiona Hill WAS NOT EVEN WORKING IN WHITE HOUSE at Time of Trump Call – But was Very Upset with Call – Huh?

And it took them ten hours to find out that she wasn't even there??

Talk about a pack of fools.

Why did she need to be there for the phone call that we have a summary transcript of?

She was questioned about what was going on with Giuliani, his 2 Soviet born thugs shadow gvt shenanigans, the State dept and administration doings PRIOR to the phone call that supported the contention that extortion was taking place.....

And why was she questioned in secret, behind locked doors, with no attorney present, and no republicans allowed to cross examine her?

What the democrats are doing is KABUKI THEATER... it's a FARCE... and believe me, the American people see it.

It's not a court of law.....do try to keep up.

 

[bodecea]

View attachment 284574 Fascinating.....10 hours of testifying "proves" they have nothing? Do tell us more.

Your living hero... the most corrupt, lying skank to ever park her lawless ass in the White House.

You sound upset. Have you been triggered by H. Clinton willing to testify for 11 hours without whining about it?

 

[Care4all]

Why ten hours? Sounds like they're brow beating the witness.

Whatever for? She wasn't even working at the Wh at the time of the call. He too has not one damn bit of firsthand information.


Latest Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’ Fiona Hill WAS NOT EVEN WORKING IN WHITE HOUSE at Time of Trump Call – But was Very Upset with Call – Huh?

And it took them ten hours to find out that she wasn't even there??

Talk about a pack of fools.

Why did she need to be there for the phone call that we have a summary transcript of?

She was questioned about what was going on with Giuliani, his 2 Soviet born thugs shadow gvt shenanigans, the State dept and administration doings PRIOR to the phone call that supported the contention that extortion was taking place.....

And why was she questioned in secret, behind locked doors, with no attorney present, and no republicans allowed to cross examine her?

What the democrats are doing is KABUKI THEATER... it's a FARCE... and believe me, the American people see it.

007, the REPUBLICAN congressman on the committee were IN THE ROOM and had their questioning power.

What made you or who told you they were not?

As far as testifying behind closed doors, it's done so witness testimony does not influence future witnesses, much like with grand jury testimony.... the target's lawyers are not present.

The transcripts, less any classified info, will be released, eventually.

In the trial in the Senate, the defendant lawyers can question witnesses.

 

[IM2]

The only word to describe this is brutality.

<< Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe
>>

Former Trump Russia adviser Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe

She volunteered her testimony.

 

[IM2]

Grow a pair, buttercup.

It proves they have nothing and are trying to set her up for a perjury trap, so **** you you heydrich loving asshole.

Wrong. But keep hope alive.

 

[IM2]

Here's hoping these leftist lunatics keep up their loathsome insanity right up to Nov 2, 2020.

You don't want that. Not at the rate these witnesses are implicating Trump.

 

[kiwiman127]

The only word to describe this is brutality.

<< Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe
>>

Former Trump Russia adviser Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe

Republicans forced Hillary Clinton to testify for 11 hours on Benghazi.

That's because Hillary was responsible for the Death of an Ambassador and Deaths of the men protecting him.

Here's the final House Report on Benghazi.
Care to point out where in the final report, it is stated that "Hillary was responsible for the Death of an Ambassador and Deaths of the men protecting him"?
Select Committee on Benghazi
It doesn't, she and Obama did share some minimum responsibility, however a majority of the responsibility was the action/lack of action by the military and intelligence. \You are classic example of a hyper-partisan relying on only hyper-partisan talking points. Facts? What are facts? That's your MO.

 

[whitehall]

What they do with an unfriendly witness is to ask the same questions over and over to try to get a different answer even if it is only slightly different. This is a perjury trap. They threaten the witness with indictment and then they have another head to display. It's something like the old timey police interrogations without a lawyer.

 

[Zorro!]

Why ten hours? Sounds like they're brow beating the witness.

Whatever for? She wasn't even working at the Wh at the time of the call. He too has not one damn bit of firsthand information.


Latest Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’ Fiona Hill WAS NOT EVEN WORKING IN WHITE HOUSE at Time of Trump Call – But was Very Upset with Call – Huh?

And it took them ten hours to find out that she wasn't even there??

Talk about a pack of fools.

Why did she need to be there for the phone call that we have a summary transcript of?

She was questioned about what was going on with Giuliani, his 2 Soviet born thugs shadow gvt shenanigans, the State dept and administration doings PRIOR to the phone call that supported the contention that extortion was taking place.....

Actually the transcript exonerates Trump of Quid Pro Quo, though Joe Biden's quid pro quo was classic.

 

[Defiant1]

Finally after years of witch hunting it looks like the dems have bagged a couple.

 

[bodecea]

What they do with an unfriendly witness is to ask the same questions over and over to try to get a different answer even if it is only slightly different. This is a perjury trap. They threaten the witness with indictment and then they have another head to display. It's something like the old timey police interrogations without a lawyer.

Was she an "unfriendly" witness?

 

[Care4all]

Why ten hours? Sounds like they're brow beating the witness.

Whatever for? She wasn't even working at the Wh at the time of the call. He too has not one damn bit of firsthand information.


Latest Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’ Fiona Hill WAS NOT EVEN WORKING IN WHITE HOUSE at Time of Trump Call – But was Very Upset with Call – Huh?

And it took them ten hours to find out that she wasn't even there??

Talk about a pack of fools.

Why did she need to be there for the phone call that we have a summary transcript of?

She was questioned about what was going on with Giuliani, his 2 Soviet born thugs shadow gvt shenanigans, the State dept and administration doings PRIOR to the phone call that supported the contention that extortion was taking place.....

Actually the transcript exonerates Trump of Quid Pro Quo, though Joe Biden's quid pro quo was classic.

No it doesn't.

Read the footnotes.

 

[Zorro!]

Why ten hours? Sounds like they're brow beating the witness.

Whatever for? She wasn't even working at the Wh at the time of the call. He too has not one damn bit of firsthand information.


Latest Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’ Fiona Hill WAS NOT EVEN WORKING IN WHITE HOUSE at Time of Trump Call – But was Very Upset with Call – Huh?

And it took them ten hours to find out that she wasn't even there??

Talk about a pack of fools.

Why did she need to be there for the phone call that we have a summary transcript of?

She was questioned about what was going on with Giuliani, his 2 Soviet born thugs shadow gvt shenanigans, the State dept and administration doings PRIOR to the phone call that supported the contention that extortion was taking place.....

Actually the transcript exonerates Trump of Quid Pro Quo, though Joe Biden's quid pro quo was classic.

No it doesn't.

Read the footnotes.

Yes it does. The claims were lies. Now, what Joe Biden did? Clear Quid Pro Quo.

 

[IM2]

Poor sad little trump a lumps. Your boy is getting his back broke and there is no more obstructing he can do. Trumps day has come and so has time come for all you trump loving bitches. He's a criminal who has been a miserable failure as president. Maybe the worst ever. He has fucked this nations rep world wide. If we got hit by terrorists tomorrow the rest of the earth would turn their backs to us.

You dumb **** racist bastards and your anti globalism bullshit. Your asses have got what you want now.

America alone. Not America first. MAGA now means Make America Go Away. That's what Trump has done.

You dumb bastards think that threatening talk equals power. Well little rocket man is still shooting missiles, the big bomb dropped in the middle of nowhere in Syria has not stopped Assad. Sanctions aren't going to stop Turkey, Russia is now the kurds best friend and ISIS is now running free back into Europe.

This is what Trump has done and while he was doing it you right wing retards had the nerve to say he was restoring respect for America.

The right are a bunch of brain damaged misinformed retards that follow a brain damaged misinformed retarded ass president who was not elected by the majority of the people.

 

[IM2]

Whatever for? She wasn't even working at the Wh at the time of the call. He too has not one damn bit of firsthand information.


Latest Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’ Fiona Hill WAS NOT EVEN WORKING IN WHITE HOUSE at Time of Trump Call – But was Very Upset with Call – Huh?

And it took them ten hours to find out that she wasn't even there??

Talk about a pack of fools.

Why did she need to be there for the phone call that we have a summary transcript of?

She was questioned about what was going on with Giuliani, his 2 Soviet born thugs shadow gvt shenanigans, the State dept and administration doings PRIOR to the phone call that supported the contention that extortion was taking place.....

Actually the transcript exonerates Trump of Quid Pro Quo, though Joe Biden's quid pro quo was classic.

No it doesn't.

Read the footnotes.

Yes it does. The claims were lies. Now, what Joe Biden did? Clear Quid Pro Quo.

Joe Biden did nothing. So there was no QPQ.