Demorats....Time To Kiss Your Party Good-bye.
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #42
Really?
As I asked earlier, can you explain why you voted for this agenda?
Race and gender preferences
Language police
No punishment for criminals
Open borders
Attacks on the Supreme Court
Transgender sports competitions
Antisemitism
Wealth tax
Cancel culture
Welfare State
Government run healthcare mandates
Sanctuary Cities
Two-Tiered Justice system
Moonglow
Diamond Member
Reagan won the election in a landslide with 489 Electoral College votes to Carter's 49, and 50.7% of the popular vote to Carter's 41.0%. Anderson won 6.6% of the popular vote and no electoral votes.
1980 United States presidential election - Wikipedia
Moonglow
Diamond Member
Reagan beat the shit out of the orange baboons numbers and the Democratic Party lived through that.
Zafira Cherry
Diamond Member
you voted for a grifting sexual predator felon and you have the gall to tell us you have been brought up correctly and knowledge of right and wrong
What are you smoking today?
IM2 get a load of this flake
Moonglow
Diamond Member
Trump has not eliminated the inheritance tax, nor has the GOP...
That's correct. Neither Donald Trump nor the Republican Party have eliminated the federal estate tax (often referred to as the "death tax" or "inheritance tax").
Here's a breakdown:
- Trump's Actions: While in office, Trump did not eliminate the estate tax. The 2017 tax overhaul, which was championed by Trump, did significantly increase the exemption level for the estate tax, meaning fewer estates were subject to the tax. However, this increase is temporary and scheduled to expire in 2026.
- Republican Party Platform: The Republican party generally favors reducing or eliminating the estate tax. In June 2025, the House of Representatives, with a Republican majority, did vote to phase out the estate tax over 10 years, according to the Brookings Institution. However, this has not yet been enacted into law.
Moonglow
Diamond Member
That stupid Ivy League Yankee is an Asian here to squander Republicans' reputations.
you voted for a grifting sexual predator felon and you have the gall to tell us you have been brought up correctly and knowledge of right and wrong
What are you smoking today?
Moonglow
Diamond Member
True, any average Joe with 24 felony convictions would be doing time in the penitentury, but not the golden boi Donald Trump the elite bitch who is extra special.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #49
This is where I get educate the ignorant, you.....
"Liberal" = socialist= communist= Democrat
The term Liberal today, in the colloquial, is the Democrat/Progressive/socialist grouping.
It is due to the communist John Dewey persuading the Socialist Party to change its name to Liberal.....so that is the way it is accepted today.
How Socialist John Dewey Switched Labels
by Jim Peron
- Pity the poor liberal. And I mean the real liberal. Not the modern watered-down socialist who calls himself a liberal but a real, honest, classical liberal. There is so much confusion over the term and real liberals have allowed fake liberals to get away with this subtle destruction of the language.
- The classical liberals proposed laissez faire and this led to prosperity. The economics of 19th century liberalism brought about a major increase in the standard of living of all people. Thus real liberalism produced the effects which socialists dreamed their system would provide.
- Many socialists wanted prosperity and thought socialism would lead to such results faster than classical liberalism. But at the same time many socialists saw their ideology as a means of grabbing power for themselves and it was the power, not the promised prosperity, which attracted them.
- [Socialists] knew that liberalism had a good reputation with the working classes — the very audience which they were targeting. The idea was to adopt the name liberal to describe socialism. Socialism, as socialism, was harder to sell. But by taking a name they did not deserve they felt they could make political gains on the backs of classical liberalism. And they did.
- In the United States, where liberalism most clearly reversed its meaning, in common parlance, it was the socialist John Dewey who openly promoted the idea of stealing the liberal label. Dewey, in his book Individualism Old and Newargued that liberal individualism had in fact disappeared and been replaced by state capitalism and that collectivism already existed in America.
- But he noted the collectivism of that day was a “collectivism of profit” and not a “collectivism of planning”. He said the only way liberalism could return to its true meaning was to adopt socialism as the means by which liberal goals would be achieved. As he put it central economic planning was “the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professed aims.”
- Peter Witonski, in his essay The Historical Roots of American Planningsaid: “Dewey was the first to argue that the word ‘liberal’—which once stood for liberal, free-market capitalism—could better serve the needs of social democracy in America than the world ‘socialism’.
- The liberalism of Adam Smith was out-of-date Dewey argued.” In his book Liberalism and Social Action, Dewey suggested that the goals of a free society could best be obtained “only by a reversal of the means to which early liberalism was committed.” But the means of liberalism were fundamentally connected to the basic premises of liberalism. A reversal of means, while keeping similar goals in mind, also changed the premises of liberalism. The “new wisdom” of Keynes with the “reversal of means” of Dewey really meant stealing the name of liberalism and applying it to another very different species. The famed economist Joseph Schumpeter noted that “the enemies of private enterprise have thought it wise to appropriate its label.”
- Today a great deal of confusion reigns because socialists decided to deceptively call their own ideology liberal. And, to a very large degree, the academics who wrote the recent texts on liberalism were socialists. Hence they were quite willing to pretend that socialism was a modern form of classical liberalism.
- [Classical] liberal describes individuals supporting free markets, private property, profit management and limited governments. So-called “liberals” support socialism, state ownership, bureaucratic management and statism.
http://orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/liberal_confusion.htm
Democracy & free markets vs socialism
http://forum.rottentomatoes.com/topic/show/1369713?page=2
Moonglow
Diamond Member
If they had never mandated auto insurance (except for the wealthy), no other mandates like it would exist.
Moonglow
Diamond Member
Great job of pigenholing like a fanatical freak fascist...This is where I get educate the ignorant, you.....
"Liberal" = socialist= communist= Democrat
The term Liberal today, in the colloquial, is the Democrat/Progressive/socialist grouping.
It is due to the communist John Dewey persuading the Socialist Party to change its name to Liberal.....so that is the way it is accepted today.
How Socialist John Dewey Switched Labels
by Jim Peron
- Pity the poor liberal. And I mean the real liberal. Not the modern watered-down socialist who calls himself a liberal but a real, honest, classical liberal. There is so much confusion over the term and real liberals have allowed fake liberals to get away with this subtle destruction of the language.
- The classical liberals proposed laissez faire and this led to prosperity. The economics of 19th century liberalism brought about a major increase in the standard of living of all people. Thus real liberalism produced the effects which socialists dreamed their system would provide.
- Many socialists wanted prosperity and thought socialism would lead to such results faster than classical liberalism. But at the same time many socialists saw their ideology as a means of grabbing power for themselves and it was the power, not the promised prosperity, which attracted them.
- [Socialists] knew that liberalism had a good reputation with the working classes — the very audience which they were targeting. The idea was to adopt the name liberal to describe socialism. Socialism, as socialism, was harder to sell. But by taking a name they did not deserve they felt they could make political gains on the backs of classical liberalism. And they did.
- In the United States, where liberalism most clearly reversed its meaning, in common parlance, it was the socialist John Dewey who openly promoted the idea of stealing the liberal label. Dewey, in his book Individualism Old and Newargued that liberal individualism had in fact disappeared and been replaced by state capitalism and that collectivism already existed in America.
- But he noted the collectivism of that day was a “collectivism of profit” and not a “collectivism of planning”. He said the only way liberalism could return to its true meaning was to adopt socialism as the means by which liberal goals would be achieved. As he put it central economic planning was “the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professed aims.”
- Peter Witonski, in his essay The Historical Roots of American Planningsaid: “Dewey was the first to argue that the word ‘liberal’—which once stood for liberal, free-market capitalism—could better serve the needs of social democracy in America than the world ‘socialism’.
- The liberalism of Adam Smith was out-of-date Dewey argued.” In his book Liberalism and Social Action, Dewey suggested that the goals of a free society could best be obtained “only by a reversal of the means to which early liberalism was committed.” But the means of liberalism were fundamentally connected to the basic premises of liberalism. A reversal of means, while keeping similar goals in mind, also changed the premises of liberalism. The “new wisdom” of Keynes with the “reversal of means” of Dewey really meant stealing the name of liberalism and applying it to another very different species. The famed economist Joseph Schumpeter noted that “the enemies of private enterprise have thought it wise to appropriate its label.”
- Today a great deal of confusion reigns because socialists decided to deceptively call their own ideology liberal. And, to a very large degree, the academics who wrote the recent texts on liberalism were socialists. Hence they were quite willing to pretend that socialism was a modern form of classical liberalism.
- [Classical] liberal describes individuals supporting free markets, private property, profit management and limited governments. So-called “liberals” support socialism, state ownership, bureaucratic management and statism.
http://orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/liberal_confusion.htm
Democracy & free markets vs socialism
www.freerepublic.com
http://forum.rottentomatoes.com/topic/show/1369713?page=2
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #52
I agree with the Great Yogi about predictions...".It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future."
Moonglow
Diamond Member
Tax bill MAGA baby bonus now called Trump Accounts
CNBC
https://www.cnbc.com › 2025/05/22 › tax-bill-maga-ba...
May 22, 2025 — President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful" tax bill includes a new savings account for children that comes with a $1,000 deposit from the
Moonglow
Diamond Member
But you already have with yer OP, duh.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #55
Are you prepared to dispute any of this????
1.Here is the basis for the war in today's Democrat Party:
"...cascading crisis around Biden — his infirmity, the crisis of confidence in the party it caused, his saddling of the party with a weak successor, his final, fatal extraction from her to promise not to break from him — wasn’t really Biden’s decision to run again. It had been the Democratic establishment’s desperation to stop Bernie Sanders and his movement from taking over the party in 2020, something they could only do by saddling themselves with a man whose political abilities many of them had little faith in."
The Democratic Party’s propping up an obviously declining Joe Biden is one of the greatest political disasters in American history.
jacobin.com
2. "The Democratic Socialists of America Don’t Know If They Should Condemn Murder
A split inside the far-left group over the shootings of Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky has spilled into New York’s mayoral race.
Last Wednesday, a 31-year-old progressive activist allegedly shot and killed two employees of the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C., in cold blood.
You would think that this would be easy to condemn. Yet when the New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America (objected) ....members of the political organization revolted. Almost immediately, a debate broke out in the national DSA’s internal message board for dues-paying members over how to respond to the killings outside the Capital Jewish Museum.
“Is it good to condemn violence against a genocidal apartheid state?” a DSA member with the username “SebastianFG” said in a post. Other members responded to the post with emojis of a heart and applause.
3. "OUT OF TOUCH Wisconsin Democrats Introduce 164-Page Bill to Erase Gender Language In the Name of Equity
They never learn.
Wisconsin's Democratic Party -- who only control the governorship -- have decided to go all-in on the gender ideology nonsense.
Democratic Governor Tony Evers proposed changing the word 'mother' to the Orwellian (and gross) phrase 'inseminated persons' not too long ago, but that apparently wasn't radical enough.
Now the Dems have introduced legislation to erase 'mother' and 'father' from state documents and legislation.
Democrats in the Wisconsin Legislature have introduced a bill that replaces the word "mother" with "person who gave birth" 370 times and eliminates the concept of a "biological mother," replacing it with "natural parent" 47 times."
Twitchy.com
4. 'The time of corona is an excellent time to practice abolishing it'
A far-left publication that gets some of its support for the liberal billionaire George Soros says there could be some good that comes out of the coronavirus pandemic.
www.wnd.com
For example, the total elimination of "the family."
"We deserve better than the family. And the time of corona is an excellent time to practice abolishing it," wrote radical-feminist activist Sophie Lewis on the website openDemocracy.
"It norms us for productive work. It makes us believe we are 'individuals,'" she said. "It minimizes costs for capital while maximizing human beings' life-making labor (across billions of tiny boxes, each kitted out – absurdly – with its own kitchen, micro-creche and laundry.) It blackmails us into mistaking the only sources of love and care we have for the extent of what is possible."
5. No Democrat can explain why they voted for this:
Race and gender preferences
Language police
No punishment for criminals
Open borders
Attacks on the Supreme Court
Transgender sports competitions
Antisemitism
Wealth tax
Cancel culture
Welfare State
Government run healthcare mandates
Sanctuary Cities
Two-Tiered Justice system
What can the Democrat run on???????????
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #56
If you really believe that, let's see a Republican agenda similar to this:
Race and gender preferences
Language police
No punishment for criminals
Open borders
Attacks on the Supreme Court
Transgender sports competitions
Antisemitism
Wealth tax
Cancel culture
Welfare State
Government run healthcare mandates
Sanctuary Cities
Two-Tiered Justice system
Moonglow
Diamond Member
As we see, polyvinylchlick is all about the propaganda, the lies she shells out incriminate her ignorance of what is going on.
jknowgood
Diamond Member
They had to have a dumb white guy to keep Obama from getting assassinated. Then a dumb black chick to keep Biden safe. Lol
Moonglow
Diamond Member
Anyone without the Biden stink will get elected.Are you prepared to dispute any of this????
1.Here is the basis for the war in today's Democrat Party:
"...cascading crisis around Biden — his infirmity, the crisis of confidence in the party it caused, his saddling of the party with a weak successor, his final, fatal extraction from her to promise not to break from him — wasn’t really Biden’s decision to run again. It had been the Democratic establishment’s desperation to stop Bernie Sanders and his movement from taking over the party in 2020, something they could only do by saddling themselves with a man whose political abilities many of them had little faith in."
The Democratic Party’s propping up an obviously declining Joe Biden is one of the greatest political disasters in American history.
jacobin.com
2. "The Democratic Socialists of America Don’t Know If They Should Condemn Murder
A split inside the far-left group over the shootings of Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky has spilled into New York’s mayoral race.
Last Wednesday, a 31-year-old progressive activist allegedly shot and killed two employees of the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C., in cold blood.
You would think that this would be easy to condemn. Yet when the New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America (objected) ....members of the political organization revolted. Almost immediately, a debate broke out in the national DSA’s internal message board for dues-paying members over how to respond to the killings outside the Capital Jewish Museum.
“Is it good to condemn violence against a genocidal apartheid state?” a DSA member with the username “SebastianFG” said in a post. Other members responded to the post with emojis of a heart and applause.
3. "OUT OF TOUCH Wisconsin Democrats Introduce 164-Page Bill to Erase Gender Language In the Name of Equity
They never learn.
Wisconsin's Democratic Party -- who only control the governorship -- have decided to go all-in on the gender ideology nonsense.
Democratic Governor Tony Evers proposed changing the word 'mother' to the Orwellian (and gross) phrase 'inseminated persons' not too long ago, but that apparently wasn't radical enough.
Now the Dems have introduced legislation to erase 'mother' and 'father' from state documents and legislation.
Democrats in the Wisconsin Legislature have introduced a bill that replaces the word "mother" with "person who gave birth" 370 times and eliminates the concept of a "biological mother," replacing it with "natural parent" 47 times."
Twitchy.com
4. 'The time of corona is an excellent time to practice abolishing it'
A far-left publication that gets some of its support for the liberal billionaire George Soros says there could be some good that comes out of the coronavirus pandemic.
www.wnd.com
For example, the total elimination of "the family."
"We deserve better than the family. And the time of corona is an excellent time to practice abolishing it," wrote radical-feminist activist Sophie Lewis on the website openDemocracy.
"It norms us for productive work. It makes us believe we are 'individuals,'" she said. "It minimizes costs for capital while maximizing human beings' life-making labor (across billions of tiny boxes, each kitted out – absurdly – with its own kitchen, micro-creche and laundry.) It blackmails us into mistaking the only sources of love and care we have for the extent of what is possible."
5. No Democrat can explain why they voted for this:
Race and gender preferences
Language police
No punishment for criminals
Open borders
Attacks on the Supreme Court
Transgender sports competitions
Antisemitism
Wealth tax
Cancel culture
Welfare State
Government run healthcare mandates
Sanctuary Cities
Two-Tiered Justice system
What can the Democrat run on???????????
What did he say about putting your money where your mouth is?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
How to prosecute the worst crime in Israel’s history?- Started by ShahdagMountains
- Replies: 0
-
-
As Republicans Pass Tax Cuts, Democrats Propose ‘Disability Reproductive Equity Day’- Started by Mack The Finger
- Replies: 3
-
