Democrats whined there is voter fraud until Trump did. Why did they stop?

[Robert W]

Blacks such as Whoopi Goldberg made a lot of money saying there is voter fraud. So called black suppression is a fraud. Democrats are who had the anti black election laws in states.
Ann Coulter deals with Whoopi and her crew. Notice that Democrat guests get to talk non stop. But she and the other Democrats talked all over Ann though she has facts to back her claims up.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

There was no credible case of voter fraud put in front of any court.

 

[Dante]

Blacks such as Whoopi Goldberg made a lot of money saying there is voter fraud. So called black suppression is a fraud. Democrats are who had the anti black election laws in states.
Ann Coulter deals with Whoopi and her crew. Notice that Democrat guests get to talk non stop. But she and the other Democrats talked all over Ann though she has facts to back her claims up.

Stop misrepresenting things. You give usmb a terrible reputation.

 

[Robert W]

Stop misrepresenting things. You give usmb a terrible reputation.

Too late for me to do that, You already have done it over and over and over.

 

[Dante]

Too late for me to do that, You already have done it over and over and over.

O'tay

 

[Robert W]

There was no credible case of voter fraud put in front of any court.

You surveyed the tens of thousands of courts? Frankly I do not believe you. I found one in TX today.

Court Cases | American Civil Liberties Union

This case presents the question whether a person can be convicted of disorderly conduct for speech that the state deems “obscene” but that does not actually qualify as unprotected obscenity under the First Amendment. The outcome of this case could have serious implications for free speech and...

www.aclu.org

 

[Robert W]

O'tay

View attachment 966411

Where did you get your picture taken?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

You surveyed the tens of thousands of courts? Frankly I do not believe you. I found one in TX today.

Court Cases | American Civil Liberties Union

This case presents the question whether a person can be convicted of disorderly conduct for speech that the state deems “obscene” but that does not actually qualify as unprotected obscenity under the First Amendment. The outcome of this case could have serious implications for free speech and...

www.aclu.org

Are you ******* serious ? You still need a few million more.