That is the ridiculously simplistic response I would expect from a Trump hater. Analyze the history of the case against Trump and all of the legal smoke and mirrors and thousands of hours Bragg invested to CREATE the magical 34 felony counts. Then add a lunatic fringe judge with a history of bias against Trump and a biased jury. Joseph Stalin would be proud of the Democrats.
Both Trump and Hunter Biden got into trouble for being who they are.
Both of them committed crimes. Both of them would have gotten away with their crimes had they not been who they are.
People went after them, to make a point. Hunter Biden was all about revenge for people going after Trump. People went after Trump because Trump is getting in everyone's faces.
You talk about "ridiculously simplistic response"... if I had written a detailed response, you wouldn't bother replying. This whole forum is full of "ridiculously simplistic responses".
You complain about it and yet in post 13 you post a gif and nothing else.
When Trump got convicted, I came on here and I spoke to one person who said "it's a sham trial" I asked why. They said "oh, this happened, that happened", so I went and looked it up and I said "you're wrong about this and you're wrong about that because this is what actually happened".
Since then not a single person has had a conversation with me about it. I've asked people what they think makes it a sham trial, and they don't respond.
Why? Because they don't care about the facts. They want to shout "sham trial" "sham trial" over and over and over and over again.
They don't want to find out that they're talking nonsense. Trump was clearly guilty. Even his own defense was laughable at best because they knew they had nothing to defend him with and they also knew they were going to use this trial to present Trump as a victim.
Trump was guilty. If you think otherwise, let's go through every issue you think makes him not guilty, shall we? Discuss each one. I bet you don't.
