democrats take the Epstein bait hook, line and sinker

[dudmuck]

Both Epstein's lawyer and now Maxwell have stated categorically that Trump isn't in their client base, so blow it out your ass.

 

[The Duke]

Release them, then. Nothing to fear, right? Right?

Apparently, from what I'm gathering, things in them were doctored and may not be true and shouldn't be released because of that. It's a flaming bag of dogshit left by Comey and Fuckheads Inc. Et al.
I expect arrests, and possibly WW3 soon.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Apparently, from what I'm gathering, things in them were doctored and may not be true and shouldn't be released because of that. It's a flaming bag of dogshit left by Comey and Fuckheads Inc.

Conspiracy theory, dude duke. Nothing to it.

 

[The Duke]

Conspiracy theory, dude duke. Nothing to it.

By next weekend, you'll see different. Some people know how to read between the lines, and some don't.
I wouldn't steer ya wrong.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

By next weekend, you'll see different. Some people know how to read between the lines, and some don't.
I wouldn't steer ya wrong.

I know you would not.

So drop the whole load and let's sort it out American style.

So much fun!

 

[The Duke]

I know you would not.

So drop the whole load and let's sort it out American style.

So much fun!

It has to be authenticated first, because there was some discovered fuckery. That fuckery may lead to some people going to Federal prison.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No, there has been no "discovered" mismanagement at all.

That is a made up unsubstantiated Trump hoax.

Release Epstein. Let him free.

 

[The Duke]

No, there has been no "discovered" mismanagement at all.

That is a made up unsubstantiated Trump hoax.

Release Epstein. Let him free.

Metinks Hillary made sure he was free a while back. Free to tell no tales.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Then release the files.

Free Epstein!

 

[Doc7505]

Who Really Backed Epstein?​

Who really had the power to protect Epstein across three states? ​

Who Really Backed Epstein | Frontpage Mag

Who really had the power to protect Epstein across three states?

www.frontpagemag.com

17 Jul 2025 ~~ By Daniel Greenfield
The first time Jeffrey Epstein was locked up, it was in a private wing of the Palm Beach Stockade with unlocked doors and a ‘work release program’ (even though sex offenders were barred from participating in work release programs) that allowed him to keep an office outside the prison, then ‘work’ from his beachfront home, hire Sheriff’s Deputies as his private security, have them refer to him as a “client” and all the records of his visitors, who reportedly included minors used for sex, were then destroyed as part of a “routine purge”.
As an example of the justifications for his special treatment, a Palm Beach officer wrote that Epstein is “poorly versed in jail routine and society and his adjustment to incarceration will most likely be atypical. For the time being, I am authorizing that his cell door be left unlocked and he be given liberal access to the attorney room where a TV will be installed”.
Both local and federal prosecutors threw the case against Epstein resulting in a light sentence. And while being a registered sex offender should have crippled his prospects when he got out, officials in three states colluded to keep him off their sex offender registries.
~Snip~
The most powerful man in Epstein’s orbit was the former president of the United States.
The obsession with connecting Epstein to intelligence agencies foreign and domestic is a very 2025 response to a problem from the Clinton administration. And many people forgot a time when the entire political and media class expended its capital denying that President Bill Clinton was a career sexual predator and that his wife’s political future depended on covering up for him. Those cover-ups involved the FBI, local law enforcement and officials in different states.
Clinton’s sexual abuses were a kind of trial run for Epstein’s. And the most disturbing thing about them was how lying about them and covering up became a litmus test for Democrats. In the brief window between Bill’s exit and Hillary’s rise, some Democrats publicly bemoaned their role in enabling the utter corruption of the Clintons, but then the Clinton Foundation, which Jeffrey Epstein claimed to have co-founded, rose and critics of the Clintons shut up again.
What could have convinced local officials in three different states to lie and protect a rapist?
~Snip~
Democrats in different states didn’t just collude to aid Epstein, but other Clinton and Democrat donors, and they also colluded to target conservatives including Trump. This was not an intelligence operation, but a partisan political campaign much like Russiagate.

9 years ago, I assembled lists of sexual predators associated with the Clintons and Democrats. Epstein was just one of the names on that list. Rather than being a unique phenomenon, Jeffrey Epstein was part of a pattern of sexual crimes surrounding the Clintons and the Democrats.
~Snip~
Could the Jeffrey Epstein case happen today? Of course. And we watched it happen.
During the Biden administration, we witnessed the spectacle of multiple law enforcement agencies, federal and local, as well officials from across the government, collude to cover up the crimes of Hunter Biden despite public photo and video evidence of drug use, prostitution and behavior that would have landed any normal person behind bars for a decade or two.
We saw the president head up a money laundering operation across members of his family in a conspiracy involving corrupt meetings with foreign billionaires from Russia to China, and payments in diamonds and through shell accounts, blood money, and threats of torture in a Middle East dictatorship aimed at witnesses who tried to speak out against the Bidens.
Jeffrey Epstein is not a phenomenon. He’s just another day in the life of the Democrats.
It’s not the Deep State, it’s the Democrat State.
And whether it’s the Clintons, Obama or Biden, Democrats have shown that they will conspire to cover up any crime, no matter how awful, not for their country or any country, but for the party.
The Epstein case matters because it shows how corrupt the Democrats are. And those trying to divert attention from the Democrats to undermine Trump with their own agendas are not only hurting the president, but are aiding Epstein’s real backers so that their crimes will continue.
Jeffrey Epstein is dead, but as Hunter Biden showed us, there are plenty of ‘Epstein's’ out there.


Commentary:
There’s a very high level of corruption in the DSA Marxist Democrat political cabal. Grabbing hold of this Epstein business is quite understandable because there’s clearly been some sort of coverup and there are a lot of "Deep State/DNC" connections or indications.
Power corrupts ... and if there’s anything today’s DSA Democrats seek to grab and hold onto ... it is POWER.
There is no nuance here just the blatant use of power and force to protect the guilty.
While however heartbreaking, anyone with a scintilla of a conscience knows that these Democrats have and do wield that power in the most egregious ways against anyone coming against them. These young girls have been silenced in a culture and world where this atrocity is minimized upon them in a collusion with those evil perpetrators across the globe.
While the Democrats virtue signal against this violence here and elsewhere, Mr. Greenfield has brilliantly outlined that when they are involved, position and power are all that is needed to silence the voices of those deliberately targeted.
The problem we face in getting to the truth regarding the Epstein death and his records is that Christopher Wray was already compromised during the Trump '45' administration allowing for all the players in the Comey FBI to go skate and go free of charges, including Democrat luminaries like Bill and Hillary, Obama and his crew.
We certainly saw it in effect with the witch hunts and persecutions of Conservatives during the Biden administration including the facts of Biden's obvious Dementia and who was really running the American government.

 

[Doc7505]

Then release the files.

Free Epstein!

~~~~~~
Indeed, ask Christopher Wray where all that evidence went....

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump, release the files.

You say you have nothing to fear.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

~~~~~~
Indeed, ask Christopher Wray where all that evidence went....

All of it was certified by Bondy.

 

[Doc7505]

All of it was certified by Bondy.

~~~~~~
Wrong after evidence was destroyed by Wray and Garland, the only thing certified was the folder that contained little to nothing.
Incidentally, if there was any scintilla of evidence in the Epstein File(s) regarding Trump or Republicans, we can all be rest assured that during the Biden administration, Garland, Wray and Democrats would have prosecuted/persecuted them vehemently.

 

[berg80]

When the Doddering Dotard refused to release his tax returns the political calculus was better to take the heat for withholding information rather than allow what it revealed to be made public.

Now he's stonewalling demands to release the Epstein files........whatever the hell is in them. Just sayin'.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

It has to be authenticated first, because there was some discovered fuckery. That fuckery may lead to some people going to Federal prison.
View attachment 1137517

Talk

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Mike Pence says "the time has come" to release the Epstein files

President Trump has decried what he calls the "Jeffrey Epstein Hoax" and has blamed Democrats and "some stupid Republicans" for doing their work.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Democrats take the Epstein bait hook, line and sinker​

democrats take the Epstein bait hook, line and sinker - Flopping Aces

Donald Trump is begging for democrats to throw him into the Epstein briar patch.

floppingaces.net

15 Jul 2025 ~~ By DrJohn

The Epstein saga continues, now with a bit of legerdemain. The alleged “Epstein list” has disappeared. Pam Bondi made the announcement a couple of weeks ago. When asked about the list In February, Bondi did say “It’s sitting on my desk right now to review.” Then it stopped existing.
When questioned about her February statement, Bondi did try to walk back her “Epstein list” comment after the DOJ memo shut down the idea of a client list existing. She claimed she was talking about the broader case files, not some specific bombshell list.

“I was referring to the entire Epstein case file, thousands of pages of documents, videos, and other materials, some of which include deeply disturbing content like child sexual abuse material. There was no specific ‘client list’ as some have speculated, but we are committed to reviewing all relevant materials thoroughly.”​

~Snip~
Kash Patel stands with Trump

The conspiracy theories just aren’t true, never have been. It’s an honor to serve the President of the United States @realDonaldTrump— and I’ll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me.​

~Snip~
Many have seized upon an alleged statement by Alex Acosta. Alex Acosta served as U.S. Attorney from 2005 to 2009 and was appointed Labor Secretary in 2017, serving until his resignation in 2019.
As U.S. Attorney, Acosta negotiated a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Epstein’s legal team, which included high-profile attorneys like Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Starr. Under the deal:

• Epstein pleaded guilty to two state charges (solicitation of prostitution and solicitation involving a minor).
• He served 13 months of an 18-month sentence in a county jail, with lenient work-release privileges allowing him to spend up to 12 hours a day at his office.
• Epstein was required to register as a sex offender and pay restitution to victims.
• The agreement granted immunity to Epstein and four named co-conspirators, plus any unnamed “potential co-conspirators,” effectively halting the FBI probe into additional victims or accomplices.

A 2020 Justice Department investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility concluded Acosta exercised “poor judgment” in opting for the NPA and failing to notify victims but found no professional misconduct or corrupt motives (e.g., Epstein’s wealth or connections).
~Snip~
Dershowitz does feel more material should be released:


But that, he concludes, is up to the Courts.
Now Trump telling the country to move on while democrats are ramping up their calls for making everything public. That includes Dick Durbin, who blocked the release of the Epstein flight logs. They may be asking for a figurative noose, i.e. what they demand be released may wind up impaling themselves. Then you watch how fast the press loses interest.
Pam Bondi has done her job. They’ve fallen into the trap.

Commentary:
Remember when someone “leaked” Trump’s federal income tax return (well at least 2 pages) showing that Trump didn’t pay any additional federal income taxes for at least one year other than the portion of his income that was withheld from Trump. I think if there was an Epstein list with Trump’s name on it, this list would have been released to the public before the 2020 election (Jeffrey Epstein was arrested on July 6, 2019).
DSA Marxist Democrats are the ones who created and controlled the documents for four years in the first place. If there was any evidence that Trump was even remotely involved Democrats would have exploited the fact.

I had a crazy thought earlier I figured was too far out there but here goes.

Is Trump holding that document release to get legislation passed? If the democrats are going to use it as leverage then use it for something you need their votes to get. Let them make a big deal about attaching the release to some bill and get it passed. Then release the documents and let the turmoil begin.

 

[citygator]

The letter bearing Trump’s name, which was reviewed by the Journal, is bawdy—like others in the album. It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman’s breasts, and the future president’s signature is a squiggly “Donald” below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.

The letter concludes: “Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.”

https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter-we-have-certain-things-in-common-f918d796?st=aDnjyD&reflink=article_copyURL_share

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

~~~~~~
Wrong after evidence was destroyed by Wray and Garland, the only thing certified was the folder that contained little to nothing.
Incidentally, if there was any scintilla of evidence in the Epstein File(s) regarding Trump or Republicans, we can all be rest assured that during the Biden administration, Garland, Wray and Democrats would have prosecuted/persecuted them vehemently.

You have nothing at all on that. Bondy certified she had everything. There is nothing about deletion or alteration.

If it has been modified, it has been done with Bondy's notification.