Democrats side with Narcoterrorists (Post VIDEO telling military to defy direct orders)

[ColonelAngus]

How is this not seditious?

The key U.S. statute is 18 U.S.C. § 2383, titled “Rebellion or insurrection.” It makes it a crime to:

• incite, set on foot, assist, or engage in a rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the U.S., or
• give “aid or comfort” to such rebellion or insurrection. Legal Information Institute+2FindLaw Codes+2

Penalties: a fine, up to 10 years’ imprisonment, or both — and also disqualification from holding any U.S. office. Legal Information Institute


The US Military launching attacks on drug filled go fast boats from Central and South America is NOT ILLEGAL. THEY ARE A THREAT TO THE USA, BRINGING IN SUBSTANCES THAT KILL AMERICANS.
Of course Dems side with NARCOTERRORISTS.
WHY DIDNT THE LEFT CRY ABOUT THESE:

Key Military Attacks Under Biden Without New Congressional Authorization​

1. February 2021 Airstrike in Syria
   • On February 25, 2021, the U.S. carried out airstrikes in eastern Syria targeting facilities used by Iranian-backed militias (Kata'ib Hezbollah, etc.). Wikipedia+1
   • Some members of Congress questioned the legality of the strike, saying Biden had not obtained prior congressional approval. CNBC
   • According to a Congressional Research Service report, the administration cited its “constitutional authority … as Commander in Chief … rather than any congressional authorizations for use of military force.” Congress.gov
2. June 2021 Airstrikes in Syria
   • On June 28, 2021, Biden ordered airstrikes in Syria targeting Iran-backed militia sites near the Iraq–Syria border. Wikipedia
   • These were described as retaliatory strikes in response to attacks on U.S. personnel/facilities in Iraq.
3. January 2024 Strikes on Houthi Targets in Yemen
   • In January 2024, the U.S. (in coordination with the U.K.) carried out major strikes against Houthi-controlled sites in Yemen. AP News+2The Washington Post+2
   • Several senators (including Tim Kaine, Chris Murphy, and Mike Lee) challenged the administration’s authority, arguing there was no current congressional authorization for “offensive U.S. military action against the Houthis.” Stars and Stripes
   • The White House maintained that the strikes were “consistent with international and domestic law” and invoked the authority of the president as commander-in-chief. The Washington Post
   • Progressive lawmakers also argued that notifying Congress (which the administration did) is not the same as obtaining a proper authorization for use of force. The Guardian+1
4. December 2023 / Early 2024 Strikes Against Iranian-Backed Militias in Iraq
   • Following a drone attack in 2023 that wounded three U.S. service members in Iraq, the Biden administration ordered retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed militias. The Guardian
   • These strikes were justified by the administration under its existing authorities (e.g., AUMFs from prior decades, plus Article II powers), not via a new congressional resolution. Some lawmakers again raised war-powers concerns. The Guardian+1

 

[Blaster]

Trump is commander-in-chief and the military will do as he wishes.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

How is this not seditious?

The key U.S. statute is 18 U.S.C. § 2383, titled “Rebellion or insurrection.” It makes it a crime to:

• incite, set on foot, assist, or engage in a rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the U.S., or
• give “aid or comfort” to such rebellion or insurrection. Legal Information Institute+2FindLaw Codes+2

Penalties: a fine, up to 10 years’ imprisonment, or both — and also disqualification from holding any U.S. office. Legal Information Institute


The US Military launching attacks on drug filled go fast boats from Central and South America is NOT ILLEGAL. THEY ARE A THREAT TO THE USA, BRINGING IN SUBSTANCES THAT KILL AMERICANS.
Of course Dems side with NARCOTERRORISTS.
WHY DIDNT THE LEFT CRY ABOUT THESE:

Key Military Attacks Under Biden Without New Congressional Authorization​

1. February 2021 Airstrike in Syria
   • On February 25, 2021, the U.S. carried out airstrikes in eastern Syria targeting facilities used by Iranian-backed militias (Kata'ib Hezbollah, etc.). Wikipedia+1
   • Some members of Congress questioned the legality of the strike, saying Biden had not obtained prior congressional approval. CNBC
   • According to a Congressional Research Service report, the administration cited its “constitutional authority … as Commander in Chief … rather than any congressional authorizations for use of military force.” Congress.gov
2. June 2021 Airstrikes in Syria
   • On June 28, 2021, Biden ordered airstrikes in Syria targeting Iran-backed militia sites near the Iraq–Syria border. Wikipedia
   • These were described as retaliatory strikes in response to attacks on U.S. personnel/facilities in Iraq.
3. January 2024 Strikes on Houthi Targets in Yemen
   • In January 2024, the U.S. (in coordination with the U.K.) carried out major strikes against Houthi-controlled sites in Yemen. AP News+2The Washington Post+2
   • Several senators (including Tim Kaine, Chris Murphy, and Mike Lee) challenged the administration’s authority, arguing there was no current congressional authorization for “offensive U.S. military action against the Houthis.” Stars and Stripes
   • The White House maintained that the strikes were “consistent with international and domestic law” and invoked the authority of the president as commander-in-chief. The Washington Post
   • Progressive lawmakers also argued that notifying Congress (which the administration did) is not the same as obtaining a proper authorization for use of force. The Guardian+1
4. December 2023 / Early 2024 Strikes Against Iranian-Backed Militias in Iraq
   • Following a drone attack in 2023 that wounded three U.S. service members in Iraq, the Biden administration ordered retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed militias. The Guardian
   • These strikes were justified by the administration under its existing authorities (e.g., AUMFs from prior decades, plus Article II powers), not via a new congressional resolution. Some lawmakers again raised war-powers concerns. The Guardian+1

.

Democrats hate children and probably drool over the tons of drugs that were, at one time, headed here to kill our children.

.

 

[Crepitus]

How is this not seditious?

The key U.S. statute is 18 U.S.C. § 2383, titled “Rebellion or insurrection.” It makes it a crime to:

• incite, set on foot, assist, or engage in a rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the U.S., or
• give “aid or comfort” to such rebellion or insurrection. Legal Information Institute+2FindLaw Codes+2

Penalties: a fine, up to 10 years’ imprisonment, or both — and also disqualification from holding any U.S. office. Legal Information Institute


The US Military launching attacks on drug filled go fast boats from Central and South America is NOT ILLEGAL. THEY ARE A THREAT TO THE USA, BRINGING IN SUBSTANCES THAT KILL AMERICANS.
Of course Dems side with NARCOTERRORISTS.
WHY DIDNT THE LEFT CRY ABOUT THESE:

Key Military Attacks Under Biden Without New Congressional Authorization​

1. February 2021 Airstrike in Syria
   • On February 25, 2021, the U.S. carried out airstrikes in eastern Syria targeting facilities used by Iranian-backed militias (Kata'ib Hezbollah, etc.). Wikipedia+1
   • Some members of Congress questioned the legality of the strike, saying Biden had not obtained prior congressional approval. CNBC
   • According to a Congressional Research Service report, the administration cited its “constitutional authority … as Commander in Chief … rather than any congressional authorizations for use of military force.” Congress.gov
2. June 2021 Airstrikes in Syria
   • On June 28, 2021, Biden ordered airstrikes in Syria targeting Iran-backed militia sites near the Iraq–Syria border. Wikipedia
   • These were described as retaliatory strikes in response to attacks on U.S. personnel/facilities in Iraq.
3. January 2024 Strikes on Houthi Targets in Yemen
   • In January 2024, the U.S. (in coordination with the U.K.) carried out major strikes against Houthi-controlled sites in Yemen. AP News+2The Washington Post+2
   • Several senators (including Tim Kaine, Chris Murphy, and Mike Lee) challenged the administration’s authority, arguing there was no current congressional authorization for “offensive U.S. military action against the Houthis.” Stars and Stripes
   • The White House maintained that the strikes were “consistent with international and domestic law” and invoked the authority of the president as commander-in-chief. The Washington Post
   • Progressive lawmakers also argued that notifying Congress (which the administration did) is not the same as obtaining a proper authorization for use of force. The Guardian+1
4. December 2023 / Early 2024 Strikes Against Iranian-Backed Militias in Iraq
   • Following a drone attack in 2023 that wounded three U.S. service members in Iraq, the Biden administration ordered retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed militias. The Guardian
   • These strikes were justified by the administration under its existing authorities (e.g., AUMFs from prior decades, plus Article II powers), not via a new congressional resolution. Some lawmakers again raised war-powers concerns. The Guardian+1

There is no secretary of war.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Bringing an ILLEGAL POISON into the US that KILLS PEOPLE.

Roughly 1 million people in the US have died from Fentanyl overdoses since 1999.

Narcoterrorists are a clear and present danger to the USA.

IT IS COMPLETELY REASONABLE TO TAKE OUT BOATS LOADED WITH DEATH HEADED TO THE USA.

What if the boats were filled with explosives and were going to ram into Port Everglades? How would that be any different than if they are loaded with Fentanyl?

 

[MarathonMike]

How is this not seditious?

The key U.S. statute is 18 U.S.C. § 2383, titled “Rebellion or insurrection.” It makes it a crime to:

• incite, set on foot, assist, or engage in a rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the U.S., or
• give “aid or comfort” to such rebellion or insurrection. Legal Information Institute+2FindLaw Codes+2

Penalties: a fine, up to 10 years’ imprisonment, or both — and also disqualification from holding any U.S. office. Legal Information Institute


The US Military launching attacks on drug filled go fast boats from Central and South America is NOT ILLEGAL. THEY ARE A THREAT TO THE USA, BRINGING IN SUBSTANCES THAT KILL AMERICANS.
Of course Dems side with NARCOTERRORISTS.
WHY DIDNT THE LEFT CRY ABOUT THESE:

Key Military Attacks Under Biden Without New Congressional Authorization​

1. February 2021 Airstrike in Syria
   • On February 25, 2021, the U.S. carried out airstrikes in eastern Syria targeting facilities used by Iranian-backed militias (Kata'ib Hezbollah, etc.). Wikipedia+1
   • Some members of Congress questioned the legality of the strike, saying Biden had not obtained prior congressional approval. CNBC
   • According to a Congressional Research Service report, the administration cited its “constitutional authority … as Commander in Chief … rather than any congressional authorizations for use of military force.” Congress.gov
2. June 2021 Airstrikes in Syria
   • On June 28, 2021, Biden ordered airstrikes in Syria targeting Iran-backed militia sites near the Iraq–Syria border. Wikipedia
   • These were described as retaliatory strikes in response to attacks on U.S. personnel/facilities in Iraq.
3. January 2024 Strikes on Houthi Targets in Yemen
   • In January 2024, the U.S. (in coordination with the U.K.) carried out major strikes against Houthi-controlled sites in Yemen. AP News+2The Washington Post+2
   • Several senators (including Tim Kaine, Chris Murphy, and Mike Lee) challenged the administration’s authority, arguing there was no current congressional authorization for “offensive U.S. military action against the Houthis.” Stars and Stripes
   • The White House maintained that the strikes were “consistent with international and domestic law” and invoked the authority of the president as commander-in-chief. The Washington Post
   • Progressive lawmakers also argued that notifying Congress (which the administration did) is not the same as obtaining a proper authorization for use of force. The Guardian+1
4. December 2023 / Early 2024 Strikes Against Iranian-Backed Militias in Iraq
   • Following a drone attack in 2023 that wounded three U.S. service members in Iraq, the Biden administration ordered retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed militias. The Guardian
   • These strikes were justified by the administration under its existing authorities (e.g., AUMFs from prior decades, plus Article II powers), not via a new congressional resolution. Some lawmakers again raised war-powers concerns. The Guardian+1

The Democrats are the Anti-American Party. They prove it every day.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Lefties, post when you or Dems ever cried about Clinton, Obama, or Biden for launching attacks on sovereign nations without Congressional approval.

DID YOU SAY THE MILITARY SHOULD DEFY ORDERS FROM CLINTON, OBAMA, AND BIDEN?

 

[g5000]

How is this not seditious?

There is already a topic about this.

Here's where you and the Twitter retard went wrong:

"Democrats openly calling for the Armed Forces to refuse to follow orders"

Nope. These hero VETERANS and former intelligence officers are reminding our troops they are allowed to disobey UNLAWFUL orders.

Your fuckard deliberately left that word out.

Deliberately.

Don't be such a sap.

 

[ColonelAngus]

There is already a topic about this.

Here's where you and the Twitter retard went wrong:

"Democrats openly calling for the Armed Forces to refuse to follow orders"

Nope. These hero VETERANS and former intelligence officers are reminding our troops they are allowed to disobey UNLAWFUL orders.

Your fuckard deliberately left that word out.

Deliberately.

Don't be such a sap.

Unlawful meaning anything Democrats do not like.

Get fucked. You know why they posted the video.

IT IS LAWFUL TO DESTROY BOATS FULL OF FENTANYL COMING TO THE US BY NARCOTERRORISTS.

YOU TAWDRY BUFOON.

 

[Auld Phart]

There is no secretary of war.

wrong again

https://www.war.gov/About/Secretary-of-War/

 

[BluesLegend]

How is this not seditious?

The key U.S. statute is 18 U.S.C. § 2383, titled “Rebellion or insurrection.” It makes it a crime to:

• incite, set on foot, assist, or engage in a rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the U.S., or
• give “aid or comfort” to such rebellion or insurrection. Legal Information Institute+2FindLaw Codes+2

Penalties: a fine, up to 10 years’ imprisonment, or both — and also disqualification from holding any U.S. office. Legal Information Institute


The US Military launching attacks on drug filled go fast boats from Central and South America is NOT ILLEGAL. THEY ARE A THREAT TO THE USA, BRINGING IN SUBSTANCES THAT KILL AMERICANS.
Of course Dems side with NARCOTERRORISTS.
WHY DIDNT THE LEFT CRY ABOUT THESE:

Key Military Attacks Under Biden Without New Congressional Authorization​

1. February 2021 Airstrike in Syria
   • On February 25, 2021, the U.S. carried out airstrikes in eastern Syria targeting facilities used by Iranian-backed militias (Kata'ib Hezbollah, etc.). Wikipedia+1
   • Some members of Congress questioned the legality of the strike, saying Biden had not obtained prior congressional approval. CNBC
   • According to a Congressional Research Service report, the administration cited its “constitutional authority … as Commander in Chief … rather than any congressional authorizations for use of military force.” Congress.gov
2. June 2021 Airstrikes in Syria
   • On June 28, 2021, Biden ordered airstrikes in Syria targeting Iran-backed militia sites near the Iraq–Syria border. Wikipedia
   • These were described as retaliatory strikes in response to attacks on U.S. personnel/facilities in Iraq.
3. January 2024 Strikes on Houthi Targets in Yemen
   • In January 2024, the U.S. (in coordination with the U.K.) carried out major strikes against Houthi-controlled sites in Yemen. AP News+2The Washington Post+2
   • Several senators (including Tim Kaine, Chris Murphy, and Mike Lee) challenged the administration’s authority, arguing there was no current congressional authorization for “offensive U.S. military action against the Houthis.” Stars and Stripes
   • The White House maintained that the strikes were “consistent with international and domestic law” and invoked the authority of the president as commander-in-chief. The Washington Post
   • Progressive lawmakers also argued that notifying Congress (which the administration did) is not the same as obtaining a proper authorization for use of force. The Guardian+1
4. December 2023 / Early 2024 Strikes Against Iranian-Backed Militias in Iraq
   • Following a drone attack in 2023 that wounded three U.S. service members in Iraq, the Biden administration ordered retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed militias. The Guardian
   • These strikes were justified by the administration under its existing authorities (e.g., AUMFs from prior decades, plus Article II powers), not via a new congressional resolution. Some lawmakers again raised war-powers concerns. The Guardian+1

I'm beginning to wonder how much money the Democrats are making on illegal drug trafficking and the illegal slave trade. Dems flood the country with another 15 million filthy scum illegals. Enough deadly Fentanyl to kill the entire country multiple times over. But in spite of 100,000 Americans a year being KILLED by the drugs plus all the RAPES and MURDERS of Americans by their invading army of illegals, Democrats rush to defend them at every opportunity.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Lefties siding with NARCOTERRORISTS.

Just amazing.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

How is this not seditious?

The key U.S. statute is 18 U.S.C. § 2383, titled “Rebellion or insurrection.” It makes it a crime to:

• incite, set on foot, assist, or engage in a rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the U.S., or
• give “aid or comfort” to such rebellion or insurrection. Legal Information Institute+2FindLaw Codes+2

Penalties: a fine, up to 10 years’ imprisonment, or both — and also disqualification from holding any U.S. office. Legal Information Institute


The US Military launching attacks on drug filled go fast boats from Central and South America is NOT ILLEGAL. THEY ARE A THREAT TO THE USA, BRINGING IN SUBSTANCES THAT KILL AMERICANS.
Of course Dems side with NARCOTERRORISTS.
WHY DIDNT THE LEFT CRY ABOUT THESE:

Key Military Attacks Under Biden Without New Congressional Authorization​

1. February 2021 Airstrike in Syria
   • On February 25, 2021, the U.S. carried out airstrikes in eastern Syria targeting facilities used by Iranian-backed militias (Kata'ib Hezbollah, etc.). Wikipedia+1
   • Some members of Congress questioned the legality of the strike, saying Biden had not obtained prior congressional approval. CNBC
   • According to a Congressional Research Service report, the administration cited its “constitutional authority … as Commander in Chief … rather than any congressional authorizations for use of military force.” Congress.gov
2. June 2021 Airstrikes in Syria
   • On June 28, 2021, Biden ordered airstrikes in Syria targeting Iran-backed militia sites near the Iraq–Syria border. Wikipedia
   • These were described as retaliatory strikes in response to attacks on U.S. personnel/facilities in Iraq.
3. January 2024 Strikes on Houthi Targets in Yemen
   • In January 2024, the U.S. (in coordination with the U.K.) carried out major strikes against Houthi-controlled sites in Yemen. AP News+2The Washington Post+2
   • Several senators (including Tim Kaine, Chris Murphy, and Mike Lee) challenged the administration’s authority, arguing there was no current congressional authorization for “offensive U.S. military action against the Houthis.” Stars and Stripes
   • The White House maintained that the strikes were “consistent with international and domestic law” and invoked the authority of the president as commander-in-chief. The Washington Post
   • Progressive lawmakers also argued that notifying Congress (which the administration did) is not the same as obtaining a proper authorization for use of force. The Guardian+1
4. December 2023 / Early 2024 Strikes Against Iranian-Backed Militias in Iraq
   • Following a drone attack in 2023 that wounded three U.S. service members in Iraq, the Biden administration ordered retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed militias. The Guardian
   • These strikes were justified by the administration under its existing authorities (e.g., AUMFs from prior decades, plus Article II powers), not via a new congressional resolution. Some lawmakers again raised war-powers concerns. The Guardian+1

If i catch them in my state, i will tell them i feel threatened because they are Commie bastards, and blow their ******* heads off.

 

[BluesLegend]

Politicians in congress have clearly been bought off by the Mexican cartels. When in history has one country gotten away with INVADING another country by the millions, KILLING 100,000 of their citizens each year, RAPING and MURDERING countless others, and WAR not been the result?

THEN that SKANK president of Mexico dares lecture us about Mexico's sovereignty??

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

.

Democrats hate children and probably drool over the tons of drugs that were, at one time, headed here to kill our children.

.

First off USAID is no longer getting funding so the democrats lost that for campaign donations. Narcoterrorists are being blown out of the water, so that funding is no longer being for democrat campaign donations. This is why Democrats are fighting to keep the drug cartels happy, which again President Trump is showing how corrupt the democrat party is. And what is worse, democrat useful idiots out there rioting and burning and getting the shit beat out of them, while the Democrat elites are laughing at them.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Second thread. Do you people even look at what you post? It Says for the military to not obey ILLEGAL ORDERS. Pro-tip its in the oath of enlistment, remember?

I (state your name) do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to the regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Second thread. Do you people even look at what you post? It Says for the military to not obey ILLEGAL ORDERS. Pro-tip its in the oath of enlistment, remember?

I (state your name) do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to the regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.

Not illegal to stop Narcoterrorists from killing Americans.

 

[BluesLegend]

Not illegal to stop Narcoterrorists from killing Americans.

They don't respect OUR sovereignty so we should go into those countries and kill them all the way DEAD!

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

First off USAID is no longer getting funding so the democrats lost that for campaign donations. Narcoterrorists are being blown out of the water, so that funding is no longer being for democrat campaign donations. This is why Democrats are fighting to keep the drug cartels happy, which again President Trump is showing how corrupt the democrat party is. And what is worse, democrat useful idiots out there rioting and burning and getting the shit beat out of them, while the Democrat elites are laughing at them.

.

Yep. Well said!

.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Not illegal to stop Narcoterrorists from killing Americans.

Which is not what the Twitter post said. Again, do you people read your own posts?