Democrats run creepy pro-pornography ad in desperate attempt to get the male vote

[theHawk]

They want men addicted to porn and getting into weird sexual shit, which usually makes them lefties:


.






.

Democrat group sparks fury with outrageous pro-porn advert

The 30-second ad by Progress Action Fund and Defend the Vote is titled 'Republicans Rubbing You the Wrong Way.'

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[EMH]

Reid Hoffman, Zionist Fascist 911 billionaire invested in gold, oil, the long bond, and defense stocks on 910

 

[ZestolPastilevsky]

Oh no...not the porn industry. Whatever would we do without them? People might have to actually develop real and healthy intimate relationships.

 

[DStar777]

The 1st Amendment is generally interpreted to protect the private possession of adult porn and that isn't likely to change.
It's a scare tactic not unlike the "Trump will be Hitler" scare tactics. Vote for Harris to prevent banning porn! (Yeah right!).

 

[1srelluc]

The Halfrican's minions were always creepy.

 

[pknopp]

I don't think I would create a thread on that if I was voting (R). Seems too close to the truth to me.

 

[GLASNOST]

They want men addicted to porn and getting into weird sexual shit, which usually makes them lefties:

What a stupid ad. People actually got paid for making it?

 

[struth]

the dems are just creepy and weird

 

[struth]

I don't think I would create a thread on that if I was voting (R). Seems too close to the truth to me.

I’m sure the ad hits close to the truth for you…but you don’t need to let us all know about your jerking off habits

 

[JGalt]

They want men addicted to porn and getting into weird sexual shit, which usually makes them lefties:


.






.

Democrat group sparks fury with outrageous pro-porn advert

The 30-second ad by Progress Action Fund and Defend the Vote is titled 'Republicans Rubbing You the Wrong Way.'

www.dailymail.co.uk

That horrible video was produced by the Progressive Action Fund. Look at some of their donors" How does someone who's "not employed" manage to donate $10,000?

Progress Action Fund PAC Donors

 

[GLASNOST]

the dems are just creepy and weird

.... and stupid.

 

[DStar777]

I don't think I would create a thread on that if I was voting (R). Seems too close to the truth to me.

FWIW, Project 2025 does call for outlawing pornography:
https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf (page 38)

Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgenderideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knotinextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexualliberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their productis as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it shouldbe imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classedas registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms thatfacilitate its spread should be shuttered.

The question is, how many Republican politicians, both elected and running, want to ban pornography? Not nearly enough to achieve this outright ban.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

They want men addicted to porn and getting into weird sexual shit, which usually makes them lefties:


.






.

Democrat group sparks fury with outrageous pro-porn advert

The 30-second ad by Progress Action Fund and Defend the Vote is titled 'Republicans Rubbing You the Wrong Way.'

www.dailymail.co.uk

Frequent Flyer to Epstein Island

 

[theHawk]

FWIW, Project 2025 does call for outlawing pornography:
https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf (page 38)

The question is, how many Republican politicians, both elected and running, want to ban pornography? Not nearly enough to achieve this outright ban.

What needs to happen is just classify the porn industry as prostitution, because that is exactly what it is. Prostitution is already illegal. Why does sticking a camera on it make it legal?

 

[j-mac]

FWIW, Project 2025 does call for outlawing pornography:
https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf (page 38)

The question is, how many Republican politicians, both elected and running, want to ban pornography? Not nearly enough to achieve this outright ban.

P2025 is not any republican platform. Trump has even said as much since it was published.

 

[pknopp]

FWIW, Project 2025 does call for outlawing pornography:
https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf (page 38)

The question is, how many Republican politicians, both elected and running, want to ban pornography? Not nearly enough to achieve this outright ban.

I can't see Trump supporting it but I most certainly could see Vance supporting it.

I'm sure someone like Jerry Falwell would have hypocritically supported it.

 

[DStar777]

P2025 is not any republican platform. Trump has even said as much since it was published.

Cue the libs claiming this is a lie in.. 3..2..1.....

 

[DStar777]

What needs to happen is just classify the porn industry as prostitution, because that is exactly what it is. Prostitution is already illegal. Why does sticking a camera on it make it legal?

You're right in how you characterize porn. It makes no sense that sex for money in private is illegal while sex for money sold as entertainment is still legal. I'm NOT for banning either by the way.
I am reminded of what George Carlin said about prostitution:

 

[Blaster]

Porn and politics go together like bread and butter.

 

[j-mac]

Cue the libs claiming this is a lie in.. 3..2..1.....

That's because the media they get their news from doesn't report on this...In fact just the opposite. They lie to them, and create this narrative.