Here is my beef, Kamala and her cronies want to censor the average voter from making hateful claims, even if it may be true.
Sen. Kamala Harris is making the potential punishment of social media platforms that don't censor what she sees as hateful speech a focal point of her
reason.com
But I disagree. I believe every voter has the right to compare their political leaders to Hitler if they act like Hitler. For example, the democrat party has championed the infanticide of over 60 million unborn babies. That is far more than the Third Reich ever murdered. And Democrats seem much more war-like today, promoting conflicts around the world, so why should people not be allowed to make such comparisons? In fact, even if there were not reasons to make the comparison, they still should be allowed to do so. As we speak, Biden is bombing the Middle East with next to no press coverage.
However, when your political leaders get up there and do the exact same thing, they presumably have a large following and sway a great deal of people which include people who are mentally deranged. This is why Obama refused to utter the words "Islamic terrorism" when an Islamic terrorist act occurred, so as not to influence the crazies to attack innocent Islamic folk. But at the same time, Obama fed into the notion that law enforcement was racist during a time when innocent white police officers were being routinely assassinated around the country after the events at Furgason. That is not very consistent or responsible.
And when some loon tried to assassinate Kavanaugh, all political leaders should denounce such an act immediately so as to condemn the loons that may follow you and look up to you. Problem is, the democrats remained silent. It took Biden 2 whole weeks before condemning it, which sends a message that they really condone it.
www.yahoo.com
