Democrats need to understand what evidence means

[Lisa558]

What is Hunters business? What’s his title?

Bagman for Biden Crime Family.

 

[Burgermeister]

Evidence doesn't matter to them. You could literally get a video confession and nothing would happen.

 

[schmidlap]

A big part of the dispute is that Democrats, in their effort to defend what increasingly looks like a highly corrupt and compromised Biden, scream “there’s no evidence!!!” The problem is that Democrats don’t understand what evidence is.

They think it means absolute proof. It does not. It means facts that make a claim likely, and to that we have whistleblower testimony, Archer’s testimony, 30+ visits from Hunter’s Burisma partner to the WH, bank records and SARs, the creation of 20 shell companies, the payoffs of $20 million coming from foreign countries and distributed to nine Biden family members, and so forth.

PLENTY of evidence.

relevant

www.law.cornell.edu

You appear to be confused. Whoever you hear screaming at you "there is no evidence!," may be the same crackpots who were screeching, "Lock her up! Lock her up!"

Evidence is not "absolute proof." It is a body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

Under our judicial system, "evidence" must be credible and sufficient to justify prosecution. The accused then has the opportunity to discredit the evidence against him before a jury of his peers.

Screaming that a Special Counsel is a "deranged lunatic!" or raving against judges and their families, fails to address the evidence.

 

[Lisa558]

You appear to be confused. Whoever you hear screaming at you "there is no evidence!," may be the same crackpots who were screeching, "Lock her up! Lock her up!"

Evidence is not "absolute proof." It is a body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

Under our judicial system, "evidence" must be credible and sufficient to justify prosecution. The accused then has the opportunity to discredit the evidence against him before a jury of his peers.

Screaming that a Special Counsel is a "deranged lunatic!" or raving against judges and their families, fails to address the evidence.

Yes, Mark….and we have a lot of evidence.

 

[Curried Goats]

Evidence doesn't matter to them. You could literally get a video confession and nothing would happen.

You got them alright! What a confession. I didn't know it was illegal to play hardball with foreign aid in order to influence policy decisions that align with American values.

 

[Curried Goats]

Yes, Mark….and we have a lot of evidence.

That Hunter committed tax fraud. What evidence do you actually have on Joe?

 

[schmidlap]

Yes, Mark….and we have a lot of evidence.

Good for you.

If that is the case, Citizen Biden may end up facing multiple indictments like Trump, but he still should not lash out hysterically at prosecutors and judges. That merely make one appear as an anus, is contemptuous of the American justice system, and serves no purpose in the litigation.

 

[Lisa558]

Good for you.

If that is the case, Citizen Biden may end up facing multiple indictments like Trump, but he still should no lash out hysterically at prosecutors and judges. That merely make one appear as an anus, is contemptuous of the American justice system, and serves no purpose in the litigation.

When one is the target of bogus indictments by the DOJ to keep one from running for office, one has the right to lash out against the weaponized government.

 

[schmidlap]

When one is the target of bogus indictments by the DOJ to keep one from running for office, one has the right to lash out against the weaponized government.

You appear to be contemptuous of American jurisprudence. A vast amount of documented evidence and the sworn testimony of many Republicans has led several grand juries to recommend multiple indictments against Trump in multiple jurisdictions. Juries of his peers will assess that evidence and the sworn testimonies, consider his attempts to refute it, and reach a consensus as to whether he is guilty or not guilty of the multiple charges.

Paranoid persecution complexes and the cry baby bleating of victimhood, like raging hysterically at officers of the court, is irrelevant to the judicial process.

 

[Lesh]

We have listed the evidence over and over.

Coincidence
Guilt by association
Exaggeration
Mischaracterization
Unfounded allegation
Assertions
Lies

These things are NOT evidence

 

[jknowgood]

Unfortunately you don't meet the definition of relevant evidence. You have put the cart, before the horse.

You have to have factual, provable evidence FIRST, then you can have relevant evidence to support the factually and provable evidence.

Which Republicans do not have, and are in a partisan witch hunt, on Hunter, to find.


Your link says

Cornell Law SchoolSearch Cornell
Toggle navigation

1. LII
2. Wex
3. relevant

relevant​

Primary tabs​

Relevant means, with regards to evidence, having some value or tendency to prove a matter of fact significant to the case. Federal Rule of Evidence 401 states that “evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.” Generally, relevant evidence is admissible, and a common objection to the admission of evidence is that it is irrelevant.

An example of relevant evidence in a murder trial could be the DNA evidence that defendant possessed the murder weapon and testimony from a witness who saw him at the scene around the time of the murder.


The Committee Notes on Rule 401 clarify that “[r]elevancy is not an inherent characteristic of any item of evidence but exists only as a relation between an item of evidence and a matter properly provable in a case.” That is, it is only an item’s relationship to what a party seeks to prove in trial that makes it relevant.

For one Hunter get a couple million from russia and Putin gets his pipeline and the money to invade Ukraine. Then Biden can launder his money through Ukraine.

 

[jknowgood]

 

[Lesh]

For one Hunter get a couple million from russia and Putin gets his pipeline and the money to invade Ukraine. Then Biden can launder his money through Ukraine.

That's your idea of evidence huh?

 

[Marener]

For one Hunter get a couple million from russia and Putin gets his pipeline and the money to invade Ukraine. Then Biden can launder his money through Ukraine.

You’re forgetting the fact that Germany wanted the pipeline. The pipeline never became operational. Once the war in Ukraine started, Biden iced the pipeline with German cooperation.

 

[jknowgood]

That's your idea of evidence huh?

Even American hating Obama wasn't stupid enough to signed off on the pipeline.

 

[jknowgood]

You’re forgetting the fact that Germany wanted the pipeline. The pipeline never became operational. Once the war in Ukraine started, Biden iced the pipeline with German cooperation.

You mean bombed?

 

[Lisa558]

For one Hunter get a couple million from russia and Putin gets his pipeline and the money to invade Ukraine. Then Biden can launder his money through Ukraine.

Don’t forget that China’s investment in the Biden Crime Family allowed them to fly their spy balloon across the entire country, taking photos of our military bases.

 

[Fueri]

Amazing to watch the same group of gullible idiots that believed one absurdity after the next regarding Trump because he was a dick now claim there is no evidence indicating Biden did anything.

People are too invested in their political decisions to rationally assess anything that indicates Joe and Hunter are influence peddling. Politicians have been doing this shit for years- The Clintons turned it into an art form. The difference here is that neither Joe nor Hunter has the intellectual firepower to properly conceal their little side business. If the pubs had any balls they'd be investigating it themselves- problem is they're dirty too, so the whole thing is nothing but a charade.

Nobody with the actual power to do anything will do anything, as they're all slurping from the same trough.

 

[jknowgood]

Don’t forget that China’s investment in the Biden Crime Family allowed them to fly their spy balloon across the entire country, taking photos of our military bases.

Also closing our mineral mines giving China complete control over our ev batteries.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Coincidence
Guilt by association
Exaggeration
Mischaracterization
Unfounded allegation
Assertions
Lies

These things are NOT evidence

And that’s all you have

The OP needs to learn what evidence is

Yes, yes! We always said that the RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA HOAX was complete BULLSHIT!!!!
Glad you understand now!