Democrats Introduce Bill That Would Force Homeowners and Renters to Disclose Number of Firearms to Insurance Companies, Government

[MAGA Macho Man]

Totally uncalled for. SCOTUS will shoot this down. The key here is do not comply.

California Democrats Introduce Bill That Would Force Homeowners and Renters to Disclose Number of Firearms to Insurance Companies, Government | The Gateway Pundit | by David Greyson

For years, California Democrats have been hostile to gun owners.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[DukeU]

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The demos are trying to make gun control an election year issue.

 

[BluesLegend]

Dem Nazi's

 

[BluesLegend]

The demos are trying to make gun control an election year issue.

Wait there's a breaking Dem memo, gun control is now code for abolish the 2nd amendment.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Totally uncalled for. SCOTUS will shoot this down. The key here is do not comply.

California Democrats Introduce Bill That Would Force Homeowners and Renters to Disclose Number of Firearms to Insurance Companies, Government | The Gateway Pundit | by David Greyson

For years, California Democrats have been hostile to gun owners.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Are you an American or are you a Democrat?

 

[toobfreak]

Totally uncalled for. SCOTUS will shoot this down. The key here is do not comply.

If the insurance companies were interested in that, they would underwrite particular policies just for that, otherwise, this amounts to a 4th amendment right violation.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

If the insurance companies were interested in that, they would underwrite particular policies just for that, otherwise, this amounts to a 4th amendment right violation.

Precisely! You hit the nail on the head.

 

[Esdraelon]

Totally uncalled for. SCOTUS will shoot this down. The key here is do not comply.

California Democrats Introduce Bill That Would Force Homeowners and Renters to Disclose Number of Firearms to Insurance Companies, Government | The Gateway Pundit | by David Greyson

For years, California Democrats have been hostile to gun owners.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Tell them to go phuck themselves and if they pull insurance that has been kept up to date, sue the hell out of them in a class-action suit. They will keep coming until they cause 2A supporters a LOT of pain. When that reaches the point of being too much, it will just be time to rebel and speak to them in the only language they seem to understand - tyrannical force.

 

[jotathought]

Totally uncalled for. SCOTUS will shoot this down. The key here is do not comply.

California Democrats Introduce Bill That Would Force Homeowners and Renters to Disclose Number of Firearms to Insurance Companies, Government | The Gateway Pundit | by David Greyson

For years, California Democrats have been hostile to gun owners.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Translated: Democrats want to know how many guns are owned.

 

[tshrimp]

Translated: Democrats want to know how many guns are owned.

So when they execute their plan to come take them, they will know what to expect and how many need collecting.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

So when they execute their plan to come take them, they will know what to expect and how many need collecting.

Exactly right

And they'll want to have an idea of how much firepower to bring to collect them under threat.

 

[Dekster]

How california wants to regulate its militia is california's to deal with.

 

[August West]

My son has been a firefighter in a rural county for over 20 years and when they hear the ammo popping, they quickly walk away from the burning structure.

 

[MarcATL]

This is a step in the right direction.

As I've advocated for years now, I believe we can flood the country w/guns

However, require Training, Registration and Insurance.

This is one of the three.

Good stuff!

 

[ColonelAngus]

Dems are obsessed with a confiscation registry.

 

[the watcher]

I can see all the Section 8 renters lining up to to list all the felons living there and how may and what kind of shooters they have. Well thought up, and guaranteed to create 30 million more instant criminals for the state to regulate.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Strictly unconstitutional

 

[Rigby5]

How california wants to regulate its militia is california's to deal with.

Wrong.

First of all, the 14th amendment says individual rights trump state authority.
Second is that the words "well regulated" in the 2nd amendment mean "smoothly functioning from being familiar and practiced".
You are conflating "regulated" with "restricted", when they originally were opposites.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Wrong.

First of all, the 14th amendment says individual rights trump state authority.
Second is that the words "well regulated" in the 2nd amendment mean "smoothly functioning from being familiar and practiced".
You are conflating "regulated" with "restricted", when they originally were opposites.

The Second has been challenged a thousand times... and the challenges keep getting swept aside