- Nov 10, 2019
- 58,118
- 37,397
- 2,490
- Moderator
- #21
Look at these reveals the Dems have released.
LOL Yeah, Dems imploding. Good!
So, let me get this straight: With the release of Epstein's emails, we found out that
- Epstein hated Trump.
- Didn't trust him.
- They weren't friends.
- The NYT directly worked with Epstein to suppress stories about him.
- After Bradley Edwards (the lawyer for the accusers) said that Trump was the only individual to cooperate and help, Epstein said Trump didn't have "one decent cell in his body."
- This was all so compelling that the democrats faked the redaction of a supposed victim's name.
- The name they blocked was Virginia Giuffre, who publicly testified that Trump was innocent.
- Oh, and also, Russiagate was confirmed a hoax, just like we said.
Are democrats retarded?
You are blowing this out of proportion. So what, if Epstein emails held by his family, written by Jeffrey Epstein say Trump knew about the young girls?
So what, if the White House held an emergency meeting in the situation room, the secure intelligence management complex located in the West Wing of the White House, designed for crisis management and communication. It was probably some staffer, overreacting? So what, if the Epstein estate is still holding a significant amount of records and Congress wants those released, also? So what, if the president called her on Tuesday to discuss her support for the petition, and on Wednesday she attended a White House meeting about the late sex offender’s case? Surely you do not think he pressured her to change her vote, favoring release of the files. Trump after all, promised during the campaign to release all the files. So what, if Donald Trump attended private parties at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion in Miami and New York, 2 places where Epstein supposedly repeatedly raped young 14 and 15 years old girls? So what, if recent emails released from Jeffrey Epstein's estate suggest that Donald Trump "spent hours" with one of Epstein's victims at his mansion? Surely, you believe Trump would never act in reckless disregard of moral, ethical boundaries, regarding women of any age, not to mention the legal issues that could ensue, if it came to light, and he was unable to pay hush money to keep it quiet.
Calm yourself. Remember, he is the MAGA that would be king, and that even he said "stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters," suggesting that his supporters' loyalty was so strong that it wouldn't affect his political standing. Surely, you do not think MAGA would turn on him, while he is still in a position to do favors and grant pardons. Surely, you believe Trump would never act in reckless disregard of moral, ethical boundaries, regarding women of any age, not to mention the legal issues that could ensue, if it came to light, and he was unable to pay hush money or grant other favors to keep it quiet.