PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
1. In order to steal the 2020 election, Democrats ignored the constitutional mandate that only the elected state legislatures can alter the “time, place, and manner” of elections.
2. That mean that any state where governors,
election officials,
attorneys general,
state courts,
state constitutions,
sec’ys of state, etc.
instituted any of these alterations in voting.....
Drop boxes
Ballot harvesting
Alter times methods of voting
How long after dates can votes be counted
Signing of absentee ballots.....
.....it was not a legal election.
3. And they'd love to do it again:
...liberals attempted to put a measure on the November ballot to gut election safeguards and skew voting rules in the influential swing state.
...a coalition of groups committed to preserving election integrity came together to challenge that effort in court. On Friday, the Arizona Supreme Court agreed: Proponents did not turn in enough legal signatures to qualify for the ballot.
Cue the predictable liberal anger. Almost immediately the left began lashing out at Arizona’s courts for “suppressing democracy.”
The 26-page initiative was a left-wing wish list of loose voting laws. The proposal gutted voter ID and eliminated safeguards against noncitizen voting.
Key protections for mail ballots would have been eliminated, and vote trafficking by political operatives would have been given the green light."
2. That mean that any state where governors,
election officials,
attorneys general,
state courts,
state constitutions,
sec’ys of state, etc.
instituted any of these alterations in voting.....
Drop boxes
Ballot harvesting
Alter times methods of voting
How long after dates can votes be counted
Signing of absentee ballots.....
.....it was not a legal election.
3. And they'd love to do it again:
"Another Leftist Attempt to Rewrite Election Rules Goes Down in Flames
...liberals attempted to put a measure on the November ballot to gut election safeguards and skew voting rules in the influential swing state.
...a coalition of groups committed to preserving election integrity came together to challenge that effort in court. On Friday, the Arizona Supreme Court agreed: Proponents did not turn in enough legal signatures to qualify for the ballot.
Cue the predictable liberal anger. Almost immediately the left began lashing out at Arizona’s courts for “suppressing democracy.”
The 26-page initiative was a left-wing wish list of loose voting laws. The proposal gutted voter ID and eliminated safeguards against noncitizen voting.
Key protections for mail ballots would have been eliminated, and vote trafficking by political operatives would have been given the green light."
Another Leftist Attempt to Rewrite Election Rules Goes Down in Flames
Another left-wing attempt to rewrite election rules has gone down in flames.
www.dailysignal.com