Democrats Falsely Claims A President Challeging Election Results = Threat To Democracy - Constitution Provides Way To Do So

[easyt65]

Part of the way Democrats are trying to go after Trump is to try to convince you that Presidrnt Trump's challenging of the 2020 election results was / is a threat to our Democracy.

Here is why Democrats fight like hell to control the education system and our children's schools' curriculum:

Democrats would much rather have the 'future of America' - our kids - learn about CRT, how to put a condom in a cucumber, or watch scanty clad Drag Queens dance then learn how to read, learn about our history, learn about the Constitution and our rights, or learn about existing Constitutional law.

Democrats declare questioning or opposing election results is criminal and is a direct threat to our democracy...despite the Chairman of the 6 Jan Committee having voted against certifying past election results.

Bullshit. The Constitution of the United States provides processes for challenging election results.

The U.S. Constitution | Constitution Center

Learn about the text, history, and meaning of the U.S. Constitution from leading scholars of diverse legal and philosophical perspectives.

constitutioncenter.org

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

How much money did you give to Trump's voter fraud fund bro??

Trump Scammed Supporters Out of $250 Million for Nonexistent Fraud Fund

The Trump campaign raised $250 million for an election fraud defense fund that didn't exist, according to the Jan. 6 committee.

www.rollingstone.com

 

[Donald H]

The question is on whether or not the election was stolen from Trump?

And now the question could become whether Trump still holds onto enough support to reclaim it back.

Last night's damage to Trump can't be left unanswered and so that calls for action by Trump that won't be within the bounds of that constitution.

However, if he wins it back then his means would very quickly be deemed consittutional, and fascism will have gained a foothold.

Is America's military secured to upholding government?

Or is that now questionable, based on the belief that the election was stolen?

 

[easyt65]

How much money did you give to Trump's voter fraud fund bro??

Trump Scammed Supporters Out of $250 Million for Nonexistent Fraud Fund

The Trump campaign raised $250 million for an election fraud defense fund that didn't exist, according to the Jan. 6 committee.

www.rollingstone.com

Zero.

I am sorry you feel that pointing out a Constitutional fact, that just so happens to undermine a Democrat false narrative, makes someone a Trump donor / supporter...

Your opposition to the Constitition would, however, explain why you follow / support Democrats (if you do so).

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Zero.

I am sorry you feel that pointing out a Constitutional fact, that just so happens to undermine a Democrat false narrative, makes someone a Trump donor / supporter...

Your opposition to the Constitition would, however, explain why you follow / support Democrats (if you do so).

Opposition to the Constitution would be trying to foment a riot in hopes it would intimidate Congress from certifying the election -- AS THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES -- and your belief that a VP can over turn an election...WHICH IS NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION


So, this means you are 1000% on board with Kamala Harris overturning the election in 2024, correct?

 

[easyt65]

The question is on whether or not the election was stolen from Trump?

No, actually not really. Democrats have attempted to demonize, at 1st, Trump for contesting the election results.

The issue of WHY he challenged the results is secondary to the fact that the Constitution gives Presisent Trump the right / ability to challenge election results, for whatever reason.

The Constitution does not say ection results can only be challenged on the grounds of 'these' *3 things.

 

[Independentthinker]

Part of the way Democrats are trying to go after Trump is to try to convince you that Presidrnt Trump's challenging of the 2020 election results was / is a threat to our Democracy.

Here is why Democrats fight like hell to control the education system and our children's schools' curriculum:

Democrats would much rather have the 'future of America' - our kids - learn about CRT, how to put a condom in a cucumber, or watch scanty clad Drag Queens dance then learn how to read, learn about our history, learn about the Constitution and our rights, or learn about existing Constitutional law.

Democrats declare questioning or opposing election results is criminal and is a direct threat to our democracy...despite the Chairman of the 6 Jan Committee having voted against certifying past election results.

Bullshit. The Constitution of the United States provides processes for challenging election results.

The U.S. Constitution | Constitution Center

Learn about the text, history, and meaning of the U.S. Constitution from leading scholars of diverse legal and philosophical perspectives.

constitutioncenter.org

Democrats are still questioning the 2016 election results, five years later.

 

[easyt65]

... your belief that a VP can over turn an election...WHICH IS NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION

I never said I believe / believed a VP can / could overturn an election...

...but thanks for the easily debunked false accusation (lie).

Try again.

 

[Lesh]

Part of the way Democrats are trying to go after Trump is to try to convince you that Presidrnt Trump's challenging of the 2020 election results was / is a threat to our Democracy.

Here is why Democrats fight like hell to control the education system and our children's schools' curriculum:

Democrats would much rather have the 'future of America' - our kids - learn about CRT, how to put a condom in a cucumber, or watch scanty clad Drag Queens dance then learn how to read, learn about our history, learn about the Constitution and our rights, or learn about existing Constitutional law.

Democrats declare questioning or opposing election results is criminal and is a direct threat to our democracy...despite the Chairman of the 6 Jan Committee having voted against certifying past election results.

Bullshit. The Constitution of the United States provides processes for challenging election results.

The U.S. Constitution | Constitution Center

Learn about the text, history, and meaning of the U.S. Constitution from leading scholars of diverse legal and philosophical perspectives.

constitutioncenter.org

The process of Congress voting against certifying electoral votes is not the issue.

That was a tactic that was never going to result in any change but it WAS a delaying tactic used to let all the other unconstitutional garbage go forward.

That last was never part of any past election process

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

I never said I believe / believed a VP can / could overturn an election...

...but thanks for the easily debunked false accusation (lie).

Try again.

But you don't mind the guy whose dick you suck so ferociously every day believed it huh??

Trump's claims that Pence could overturn election are 'wrong,' former VP says

Former Vice President Mike Pence is directly rebutting Donald Trump’s false claims that Pence somehow could have overturned the results of the 2020 election.

www.pbs.org

You are a weasely clown...

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Democrats are still questioning the 2016 election results, five years later.

Oh really??

When are they storming the capitol??

What "VOTER FRAUD FUND" are they asking people to donate to so they can investigate 2016 voter fraud?


Basically what you are saying is that -- you will basically accept anything coming from Trump as long as you believe Democrats do it too?? That is pathetic...

 

[Donald H]

The issue of WHY he challenged the results is secondary to the fact that the Constitution gives Presisent Trump the right / ability to challenge election results, for whatever reason.

Yes of course, but it doesn't grant him the right to challenge the election in the way he did. Or at least tried to challenge, but then failed to stand up to lead his challenge.

However, a successful coup can be legitimized as being constitutional after the fact, based on it being righteous.

 

[Independentthinker]

Oh really??

When are they storming the capitol??

What "VOTER FRAUD FUND" are they asking people to donate to so they can investigate 2016 voter fraud?


Basically what you are saying is that -- you will basically accept anything coming from Trump as long as you believe Democrats do it too?? That is pathetic...

Democrats are still questioning the 2016 election results, five years later.

 

[Lesh]

Democrats are still questioning the 2016 election results, five years later.

Actually they're not...but hey...you're never right so...

 

[easyt65]

But you don't mind the guy whose dick you suck so ferociously every day believed it huh??

Trump's claims that Pence could overturn election are 'wrong,' former VP says

Former Vice President Mike Pence is directly rebutting Donald Trump’s false claims that Pence somehow could have overturned the results of the 2020 election.

www.pbs.org

You are a weasely clown...

Dude, STFU already.

You just got caught lying, making a false accusation against me ... and you respond by ... doing it AGAIN...then calling me a name.

You are a self-demonstrated, proven liar who has absolutely no dignity or shame.

Go away, Troll.

 

[easyt65]

The U.S. Constitution | Constitution Center

Learn about the text, history, and meaning of the U.S. Constitution from leading scholars of diverse legal and philosophical perspectives.

constitutioncenter.org

 

[easyt65]

Yes of course, but it doesn't grant him the right to challenge the election in the way he did. Or at least tried to challenge, but then failed to stand up to lead his challenge.

However, a successful coup can be legitimized as being constitutional after the fact, based on it being righteous.

To attempt to support your claim you must lie and make the false accusations that:

1) Jan 6 was a 'coup' attempt
- NO ONE believes that shit. The FBI'S 1ST REPORT DRCLARED IT A RIOT...PELOSI CALLED IT A RIOT

2) Trump ordered / called for a coup / insurrection at the Capitol...but Trump's own words - which the 6 Jan Committe refused to read / submit for evidence DESTROYS this lie / false narrative. Trump called on the people assembled to walk PEACEFULLY to rhe Capitol so their voices could be heard, urged people to be NON-VIOLENT, to OBEY LAWS, and to RESPECT THE CAPITOL POLICE

Rachel Maddow, a leftist extremist, also DESTROYED this false narrative by pointing out the people who perpetrated the riot at the Capitol did not attend Trump's rally & those who did did not make it to the Capitol before the riot started.


You have either easily, completely been duped - swallowd the kool-aid and began parroting it before you got the facts and stopped to think for yourself OR you already knew a of this and are just willingly, intentionally parroting the lies.

 

[Donald H]

To attempt to support your claim you must lie and make the false accusations that:

1) Jan 6 was a 'coup' attempt
- NO ONE believes that shit. The FBI'S 1ST REPORT DRCLARED IT A RIOT...PELOSI CALLED IT A RIOT

2) Trump ordered / called for a coup / insurrection at the Capitol...but Trump's own words - which the 6 Jan Committe refused to read / submit for evidence DESTROYS this lie / false narrative. Trump called on the people assembled to walk PEACEFULLY to rhe Capitol so their voices could be heard, urged people to be NON-VIOLENT, to OBEY LAWS, and to RESPECT THE CAPITOL POLICE

Rachel Maddow, a lfleftist extremist, also DESTROYED this false narrative by pointing out tge people who perpetrated the riot at the Capitol did not attend Trump's rally & those who did did not make it to the Capitol before the riot started.


You have either easily, completely been duped - swallowd the kool-aid and began parroting it before you got the facts and stopped to think for yourself OR you already knew a of this and are just willingly, intentionally parroting the lies.

Alright then I'm wrong and now I accept your explanation.

 

[konradv]

Part of the way Democrats are trying to go after Trump is to try to convince you that Presidrnt Trump's challenging of the 2020 election results was / is a threat to our Democracy.

Here is why Democrats fight like hell to control the education system and our children's schools' curriculum:

Democrats would much rather have the 'future of America' - our kids - learn about CRT, how to put a condom in a cucumber, or watch scanty clad Drag Queens dance then learn how to read, learn about our history, learn about the Constitution and our rights, or learn about existing Constitutional law.

Democrats declare questioning or opposing election results is criminal and is a direct threat to our democracy...despite the Chairman of the 6 Jan Committee having voted against certifying past election results.

Bullshit. The Constitution of the United States provides processes for challenging election results.

The U.S. Constitution | Constitution Center

Learn about the text, history, and meaning of the U.S. Constitution from leading scholars of diverse legal and philosophical perspectives.

constitutioncenter.org

It is a danger, if he insists on it even after court after court has ruled against him.

 

[berg80]

Part of the way Democrats

This guy is a conservative Republican.

Read: J. Michael Luttig's opening statement at Jan. 6 select committee hearing

Read former judge J. Michael Luttig's full opening remarks

www.politico.com