Democrats Exhibit Amnesia About Biden-Era Lawfare

[80zephyr]

Does it “appear” so? I sort of doubt that. Very few facts to corroborate the allegations have been made public. For Comey, there’s almost no facts made public.

Then lets see what they found.

 

[Marener]

Then lets see what they found.

If you haven’t seen it, I’m confused as to why you decided they “appeared” to have committed a crime.

Reporting on this suggests otherwise. The house in question from James doesn’t seem like a rental, her grand niece is living there rent free. As for Comey, it looks like they might be trying to play games about the wording in the testimony.

 

[struth]

The norm is that the president doesn't hire and fire prosecutors specifically for the reason of going after his political enemies. Trump broke that norm.

This has nothing to do with the case against Comey. The supposed authorized leak they're trying to prosecute isn't McCabe. Also, the IG report says that Comey's version of the truth is more believable than McCabe.

Tuli Gabbard is politicizing the DNI. A lot of Republicans saying things about the investigation isn't really a unbiased investigation.

If you don't have a case going into the interview, you aren't going to have a case coming out of the interview. You don't think Clinton is just going to admit to crimes, do you?

Lots of reason to doubt the indictment is illegitimate. For example, the rent she got for the house is quite modest. NY Times is reporting that her grand niece lives there now, not a renter.

Trump overstated the value of his property by hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars. Huge sums. That's just a face. The best defense Trump has is that "everyone does it", which might be true.

She's almost certainly illegally appointed. Firing prosecutors who don't indict your enemies is just not normal and hopefully never will be.

The indictment of Bolton was handled FAR differently and when we got to see the case, it looks really bad for him. So they're muted because the facts differ. That's how people are supposed to operate.

No one is being investigated for "lawfare". They're being investigated for basically anything they can find to punish them.

The purpose of criminal justice is not retribution. Damn, that's really pathetic. Justice is fair and impartial. Retribution is personal.

And they were all guilty of doing just that.

Even if we accept that James committed mortgage fraud, it's true that isn't not uncommon. Hell, Ken Paxton did far worse in Texas but he has nothing to worry about.

True! Which is one of the prosecutions against Trump, but that doesn't get any mentions in here.

You literally failed with your first point, xiden actually illegally hired Jack smith for a specific purpose of going after Trump

 

[IM2]

There was no such lawfare during Biden.

 

[struth]

There was no such lawfare during Biden.

Correct what we saw under xiden was demafacist political prosecutions akin to Nazi purges

 

[IM2]

We both have our own opinions. I'm not interested in your OPINIONS. My article in the OP speaks for itself.

Yes, it speaks of a partisan right-wing opinion being made by Spivak that ignores real crimes that were committed.