Democrats did not applaud Reagan’s attempted assassination and cheer for another try

On this thread totally unrelated, she brought in the fact that I am Jewish - and got in how blacks have had it worse than Jews. If I were to report it for being off topic, the mods will ignore that - or worse, scold ME.

What happened earlier is that the poster who uses a swastika as his avatar - the most offensive symbol known to Jews and symbolic of Hitler’s mass extermination of Jews - asked why people prejudge others. I said that his using a swastika as his avator is highly offensive to Jews and intended as such, and the SENIOR MODERATOR joined in to say that he could have a very valid reason for using a swastika, and that I - the Jew who objected to it - made an ”ass of herself” by assuming his use of a swastika has a negative intent. .

IOW, the moderator defended the swastika poster and scolded the Jew for complaining.

The Jew-haters on that thread immediately jumped into action, knowing they have the mods on their side against the Jew, and started in with their usual abuse. That has carried over to this thread, as you see from Newsvine - trying to bait the Jew girl. The mod had sent out the dog whistle.

This has become a site moderated by antisemites, or at least those who will side against Jews, or make excuses for Jew-haters.

The blacktivists won’t be baiting me anymore. They’re moving into the ignore column, and they will have to get the pleasure by abusing some other Jew.
Nobody here hates Jews. But people do dislike you. And you created it. Nobody here has cheered for Trumps assasination and asked for another try. But Trump has made light of violence that have happened to others and his supporters in this thread do it al the time. There are no blacktivists here, but the rants that come from the anti back jew in this forum when she invades other threads will be reported every time they are posted.
 
I do not even read your posts. You are a race baiter and a liar. Anything else?
Everybody who opposes the racism trump supporters post in this forum are called race baiters.
 
Yes, this shows how deranged Democrats have become. There are many who have applauded the attempt, and cheer in approval when someone (of course another Dem) says he’s sorry he missed.

THIS is how disgusting some of you have become. It will spell the end of the Democrat Party rule, as decent people see it - and reject it.

(And consider how the DEI push almost cost Trump his life and did indeed cost one of his supporters his. The incompetent Secret Service chief put the A-team on Jill Biden’s rally, and substituted the practice squad for Trump. And then, to cover the fact the DEI has resulted in an unqualified workforce even in critical positions, she makes up a lie about the sloped roof.)


Again: we cannot "unite" with these people. They don't want it either. They mean it as a concession only when they lose, and lose badly.

When we win, we just want their ideas roundly and fully rejected.

When they win, they want us eliminated. Either socially or literally. Have no doubt about that.
 
What happened earlier is that the poster who uses a swastika as his avatar - the most offensive symbol known to Jews and symbolic of Hitler’s mass extermination of Jews - asked why people prejudge others

He or she is the lucky one. In Germany, there are laws in place. The displaying of the swastika and other memorabilia is forbidden, and denying the Holocaust is a punishable offence.
 
Reagan White House Files Show Ronald and Nancy Repeatedly Snubbed Donald Trump and His 'Large Ego'
Donald Trump once invited Ronald and Nancy Reagan to a LaToya Jackson concert at his Atlantic City casino

By Tierney McAfee Published on June 22, 2016 04:50PM EDT

In 1986, a 40-year-old Donald Trump sent a letter to then-First Lady Nancy Reagan inviting her to stay at his Mar-a-Lago mansion – which, he informed her, was designed to be the “southern White House” – when she came down for the American Red Cross Ball in Palm Beach, Florida.


According to a Washington Post review of Reagan Library archives, the East Wing staff had no clue what Trump was talking about – the first lady had not been invited to the Red Cross ball – but Mrs. Reagan nevertheless drafted a hand-written letter declining the businessman’s invitation and telling him, “I am familiar with Mar-a-Lago.” Then, apparently thinking better of the potentially ego-stroking line – she crossed it out.


Trump’s ego – more so than Trump himself – was well-recognized at the Reagan White House, where, The Post‘s review of records found, aides sought to reject the mogul’s many overtures without wounding his pride.

Since launching his presidential bid last summer, Trump has frequently compared himself to Ronald Reagan and claimed a closeness with the 40th president – “He liked me,” Trump has said – that did not exist, the White House records suggest.

In 1987, White House Political Director Frank J. Donatelli wrote a memo asking Chief of Staff Howard Baker to reach out to Trump directly after the New York developer announced that he was weighing a request to headline a big fundraiser for congressional Democrats. “It would be most helpful if you would place a phone call to Don Trump today. He has a large ego and would be responsive to your call,” Donatelli wrote in the memo, underlining the word “large.” (Trump ultimately decided not to chair the event.)

The memo came amid a decade’s worth of almost-begging invitations Trump extended to the Reagans – all of which the president and first lady declined or ignored. Here are six examples, via The Washington Post:

• “In 1983, a request came in for a presidential telegram congratulating Trump on the grand opening of his eponymous tower on Fifth Avenue. A lawyer in the counsel’s office wrote ‘NO’ and explained internally that it would be inappropriate because it was a ‘commercial’ venture.
Sound like he begged them to come to things he invited them to…


I am still waiting on the text of this ad where he bashed Reagan….
 
He or she is the lucky one. In Germany, there are laws in place. The displaying of the swastika and other memorabilia is forbidden, and denying the Holocaust is a punishable offence.
Sadly, the United States has become a country where expressions of antisemitism are not only allowed, but where the antisemites are defended and Jews who object are scolded.

That a senior moderator would say, in effect, that a poster can have a valid reason for displaying a swastika (and then reprimanding the Jew) is the same sentiment as when the Harvard president said it can be OK to call for the genocide of Jews, depending on context.

You and I both know that this tyoe of thing would never be accepted against any other minority.
 
Actually democrats applauded the not guilty verdict by reason of insanity when Hinckley was clearly a political assassin. God only knows how democrats would have defended Crooks if he hadn't been killed.
Prove that.
 
The differences were far more nuanced. then today where you have near Marxist level traitors.
Gotta question for ya. The "Marxist level traitors" bit. Is that something you really believe in? Is it something you can defend without sounding like a lunatic?

If you think you can, please proceed. Or, perhaps you want to acknowledge you've engaged in a some hyperbole.
 
Yes, this shows how deranged Democrats have become. There are many who have applauded the attempt, and cheer in approval when someone (of course another Dem) says he’s sorry he missed.

THIS is how disgusting some of you have become. It will spell the end of the Democrat Party rule, as decent people see it - and reject it.

(And consider how the DEI push almost cost Trump his life and did indeed cost one of his supporters his. The incompetent Secret Service chief put the A-team on Jill Biden’s rally, and substituted the practice squad for Trump. And then, to cover the fact the DEI has resulted in an unqualified workforce even in critical positions, she makes up a lie about the sloped roof.)

How persuasive did the author of the article think he would be after using the AI generated image of Individual 1 as a super human figure? Especially after we were reminded of his mortality last week.
 
Gotta question for ya. The "Marxist level traitors" bit. Is that something you really believe in? Is it something you can defend without sounding like a lunatic?

If you think you can, please proceed. Or, perhaps you want to acknowledge you've engaged in a some hyperbole.
Gotta a question for ya. Do you really believe that Trump is a “threat to democracy”? Or that he’s “evil”? And are you “terrified” that voters might choose him over a senile old man?

If so, you might want to recognize that you have bought into a massive propaganda campaign.
 
The text is in here:

What’s wrong with his criticizing Reagan’s foreign policy? Did he call the man “evil”? Or that he is a “threat to democracy”?

Today’s Democrats are beyond recognition, and there vile rhetoric almost cost Trump his life - and we have Democrats bemoaning that the killer was unsuccessful. How is that comparable to criticizing foreign policy?

Next thing you know, some deranged Democrats will draw a parallel between catching a mild case of COVID and being shot in the head within 1/4 inch of one’s life.
 
Gotta a question for ya. Do you really believe that Trump is a “threat to democracy”?
He has, in fact, already threatened democracy when he tried to steal the election.

Now please answer my question.
 
Yes, this shows how deranged Democrats have become. There are many who have applauded the attempt, and cheer in approval when someone (of course another Dem) says he’s sorry he missed.

THIS is how disgusting some of you have become. It will spell the end of the Democrat Party rule, as decent people see it - and reject it.

(And consider how the DEI push almost cost Trump his life and did indeed cost one of his supporters his. The incompetent Secret Service chief put the A-team on Jill Biden’s rally, and substituted the practice squad for Trump. And then, to cover the fact the DEI has resulted in an unqualified workforce even in critical positions, she makes up a lie about the sloped roof.)

So some or all of the presidents after Reagan must have divided America. I know Obama widened the race divide, read that when I looked into his legacy. Which presidents do you think are the culprits, or is it due to party as opposed to president(s)?
 
He has, in fact, already threatened democracy when he tried to steal the election.

Now please answer my question.
The people who stole the election are on your side.

And that you believe Trump tried to steal the election tells me you shouldn’t diss people for recognizing that we have anti-Americans who have infiltrated the highest level of our government.
 
The people who stole the election are on your side.

And that you believe Trump tried to steal the election tells me you shouldn’t diss people for recognizing that we have anti-Americans who have infiltrated the highest level of our government.
Well, okay, now I know having a rational discussion with you is not possible.
 
So some or all of the presidents after Reagan must have divided America. I know Obama widened the race divide, read that when I looked into his legacy. Which presidents do you think are the culprits, or is it due to party as opposed to president(s)?
It started with Obama, who proudly announced he was going to “transform” America. It then morphed into the party platform - and you see the results of it today.

That is why Democrats will stop at nothing to stop the man who can put the brakes on this transformation, and begin reversing the damage.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom