Democrats Are Losing The Black Vote Over Trump's D.C. Crackdown

[mudwhistle]

Many Blacks are getting fed up with Democrats who talk like they care about the black community but never do anything to improve their cities.

They're starting to see the writing on the wall and are leaving the plantation in droves.

If this keeps up, Democrats are going to have to create another George Floyd situation, or they're going to have to rely on rigging elections with only the white female liberal voter as their base.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

But... but...but... TTTRRRUUUUUUMMPP!!! AAAUUUUUUUGGHH!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Blaster]

Blacks are leaving the Democrat party in droves.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Many Blacks are getting fed up with Democrats who talk like they care about the black community but never do anything to improve their cities.

They're starting to see the writing on the wall and are leaving the plantation in droves.

If this keeps up, Democrats are going to have to create another George Floyd situation, or they're going to have to rely on rigging elections with only the white female liberal voter as their base.

The issue going forward though is that you cannot have federal police taking over every city. If this occurs, what is the need for a municipal police force? You might as well just have the military employed across America, which would in essence, make them an occupying force.

Have police unions accept 3x the number of police on foot in pairs. This will decrease crime.

Yes, it's more dangerous. These soldiers face the same right now.

As I've said it;s a slippery slope and it isn't the legacy Trump wants. There are many Red states with high crime rates too, is Trump going to put these GOP leaders in such a difficult position?

Civil liberties and your Constitution are what drove the world AWAY from fascism and communism. It's a slippery slope, I won't stop repeating this motto.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

The issue going forward though is that you cannot have federal police taking over every city. If this occurs, what is the need for a municipal police force? You might as well just have the military employed across America, which would in essence, make them an occupying force.

Have police unions accept 3x the number of police on foot in pairs. This will decrease crime.

Yes, it's more dangerous. These soldiers face the same right now.

As I've said it;s a slippery slope and it isn't the legacy Trump wants. There are many Red states with high crime rates too, is Trump going to put these GOP leaders in such a difficult position?

Civil liberties and your Constitution are what drove the world AWAY from fascism and communism. It's a slippery slope, I won't stop repeating this motto.

You are not wrong, but the problem was brought to us by Democrats and their "Defund the Police" movement - as well as major Democrat donors like George Soros who personally spent $100 millions in prosecutors elections across the country who pledged to NOT PROSECUTE criminals.

 

[otto105]

Many Blacks are getting fed up with Democrats who talk like they care about the black community but never do anything to improve their cities.

They're starting to see the writing on the wall and are leaving the plantation in droves.

If this keeps up, Democrats are going to have to create another George Floyd situation, or they're going to have to rely on rigging elections with only the white female liberal voter as their base.

Bah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

 

[Rambunctious]

Its easy to sit behind gated communities in Lily white towns and complain about cops doing their duty... try living in a place where you fall asleep listening to gun fire outside your windows... disconnected white libs are our nation's biggest problem...

 

[mudwhistle]

The issue going forward though is that you cannot have federal police taking over every city. If this occurs, what is the need for a municipal police force? You might as well just have the military employed across America, which would in essence, make them an occupying force.

Have police unions accept 3x the number of police on foot in pairs. This will decrease crime.

Yes, it's more dangerous. These soldiers face the same right now.

As I've said it;s a slippery slope and it isn't the legacy Trump wants. There are many Red states with high crime rates too, is Trump going to put these GOP leaders in such a difficult position?

Civil liberties and your Constitution are what drove the world AWAY from fascism and communism. It's a slippery slope, I won't stop repeating this motto.

Democrats want to eliminate cops entirely.
They figure that they can replace cops with social workers.

What we need to do is put cops in armored vehicles and give them all as much fire power as possible. They are pretty much defenseless and outgunned by thugs and gang related drug dealers.

12, 14, and 16 year olds have better weapons than the cops carry.

But the number one cause of crime is lax Democrat laws and activist judges refusing to enforce the law.

 

[Rambunctious]

Its easy to sit behind gated communities in Lily white towns and complain about cops doing their duty... try living in a place where you fall asleep listening to gun fire outside your windows... disconnected white libs are our nation's biggest problem...

 

[Hafar1014]

The issue going forward though is that you cannot have federal police taking over every city. If this occurs, what is the need for a municipal police force? You might as well just have the military employed across America, which would in essence, make them an occupying force.

Have police unions accept 3x the number of police on foot in pairs. This will decrease crime.

Yes, it's more dangerous. These soldiers face the same right now.

As I've said it;s a slippery slope and it isn't the legacy Trump wants. There are many Red states with high crime rates too, is Trump going to put these GOP leaders in such a difficult position?

Civil liberties and your Constitution are what drove the world AWAY from fascism and communism. It's a slippery slope, I won't stop repeating this motto.

The crime ridden democrats cities cant hire enough police after creating hostility toward them. What then let criminals run the city

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Democrats 2020 - POLICE BRUTALITY!!! DEFUND THE POLICE!!! TOO MANY PEOPLE IN JAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




Fast forward to 2025...

 

[Polishprince]

A little early to predict how this will affect the Democrat Party's share of the black vote.

The Dems have figured that black people are pro-crime and anti-cop, and have picked that hill to defend on. The libs should sponsor a march on Washington this week to rally for the nation's criminals on the anniversary of MLK's original march.

 

[mudwhistle]

A little early to predict how this will affect the Democrat Party's share of the black vote.

The Dems have figured that black people are pro-crime and anti-cop, and have picked that hill to defend on. The libs should sponsor a march on Washington this week to rally for the nation's criminals on the anniversary of MLK's original march.

WRONG!

Most blacks want safe neighborhoods to live in.

You can tell which neighborhoods are black by the trash in the streets, the homeless people living under bridge overpasses, and the sound of gunfire after 10pm almost every night.

 

[MarcATL]

Does that mean that Republicans are gaining the Black vote OP, or something else?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Does that mean that Republicans are gaining the Black vote OP, or something else?

They already have gained black votes, and will gain more.
But the largest likelihood is less will vote period, which is still a gain for Republican races.

 

[mudwhistle]

Does that mean that Republicans are gaining the Black vote OP, or something else?

Maybe one of these days blacks will forget all of that racist brainwashing and face up to reality.

Liberal Democrats are black's worst enemies.

 

[Dorian Mode]

They already have gained black votes, and will gain more.
But the largest likelihood is less will vote period, which is still a gain for Republican races.

I think less will sell their votes to the ballot harvesters and more will actually vote for the GOP.

 

[Independent thinker]

You are not wrong, but the problem was brought to us by Democrats and their "Defund the Police" movement - as well as major Democrat donors like George Soros who personally spent $100 millions in prosecutors elections across the country who pledged to NOT PROSECUTE criminals.

Even before defund the police, dem policies resulted in high crime. Defund just made it even worse than it was. The problem really stems from the voters in these areas voting for these woke liberal candidates and judges who have abused their powers in the name of racism and social injustice, which brings on high crime to the point that even blacks themselves are tired of all of the senseless violence and blacks victimizing blacks. The fact is, whites don't want whites committing crimes against them and blacks don't really want blacks committing crimes against them either. Lock up the bastards, no matter what race they are.

 

[TimFitz]

White supremacism runs amok on this thread.

 

[hadit]

The issue going forward though is that you cannot have federal police taking over every city. If this occurs, what is the need for a municipal police force? You might as well just have the military employed across America, which would in essence, make them an occupying force.

Have police unions accept 3x the number of police on foot in pairs. This will decrease crime.

Yes, it's more dangerous. These soldiers face the same right now.

As I've said it;s a slippery slope and it isn't the legacy Trump wants. There are many Red states with high crime rates too, is Trump going to put these GOP leaders in such a difficult position?

Civil liberties and your Constitution are what drove the world AWAY from fascism and communism. It's a slippery slope, I won't stop repeating this motto.

DC is not a state and is not in a state. Putting troops in a state is a problem that putting them in DC is not.