Democrats Are Going to Prosecute Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

Where were they then?

G7B9MnlaQAAJNQx



 
Fine!! Use 2000 lbs bombs rather than 500 lbs bombs.
Kill everything in the grid square to make the Dems happy.


1764545641995.webp
 
The criminal mind at the top of the cult has oozed into the skulls of the cultists ^^
 
Cultist says what?
One of these guys is a cultist?

The House Armed Services Committee followed suit on Saturday. In a joint statement, Representatives Mike Rogers, Republican of Alabama and the panel’s chairman, and Adam Smith of Washington, the senior Democrat, said that they were “committed to providing rigorous oversight” of the boat strikes and that they were “taking bipartisan action to gather a full accounting of the operation in question.”
 
A top Republican and Democrats in Congress suggested on Sunday that American military officials might have committed a war crime in President Trump’s offensive against boats in the Caribbean after a news report said that during one such attack, a follow-up strike was ordered to kill survivors.

The remarks came in response to a Washington Post report on Friday that said that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had given a verbal order to kill everyone aboard boats suspected of smuggling drugs, and that this led a military commander to carry out a second strike to kill those who had initially survived an attack in early September.

“Obviously if that occurred, that would be very serious, and I agree that that would be an illegal act,” Representative Mike Turner, Republican of Ohio and a former chairman of the Intelligence Committee, said on “Face the Nation” on CBS.

Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, said on CBS that if the report was accurate, the attack “rises to the level of a war crime.” And on CNN, when asked if he believed a second strike to kill survivors constituted a war crime, Senator Mark Kelly, Democrat of Arizona, answered, “It seems to.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/30/us/politics/trump-boat-strikes-war-crime.html

Are the R's actually growing a pair? We shall see. But one thing is certain. If they have decided to take their oversight responsibility seriously regarding the rampant lawlessness we've seen during trump 2.0, the next three years are going to look very different from the first.
How sad for you that "sources" cannot be used as evidence in a court of law.
 
This is based on anonymous sources with no actual evidence. It is beyond irresponsible to even comment on this publicly for any so-called leader. Shameful nonsense.
 
15th post
1. So there was no 2nd shot...
2. If there was a 2nd shot no one ordered it, the pilot just wanted to completely destroy the boat and the drugs.
3. I don't see any problem.
 
1. So there was no 2nd shot...
2. If there was a 2nd shot no one ordered it, the pilot just wanted to completely destroy the boat and the drugs.
3. I don't see any problem.
Well sure, when you make things up, any problem can go away.
 
Back
Top Bottom