Democrats Announce Articles Of Impeachment

[g5000]

******* Clowns is what they are.

‘Abuse of Power Is Not a Crime’: Trump’s Former AG Defines His Credo

One of the four charges by the Republicans against Bill Clinton was abuse of power: IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PURSUANT TO H. RES. 581: CONSIDERATION OF ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT

Today we have four charges before us against the President,
two perjury counts, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power.

 

[g5000]

Dems- How many states do we lose in 2020 with this quid pro quo farce?

Pollsters- 48

Dems- how many if we use vague shit like abuse of power?

Pollsters- 47

Dems- **** it go with that one.

One of the four charges by the Republicans against Bill Clinton was abuse of power: IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PURSUANT TO H. RES. 581: CONSIDERATION OF ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT

Today we have four charges before us against the President,
two perjury counts, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

******* Clowns is what they are.

‘Abuse of Power Is Not a Crime’: Trump’s Former AG Defines His Credo

One of the four charges by the Republicans against Bill Clinton was abuse of power: IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PURSUANT TO H. RES. 581: CONSIDERATION OF ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT

Today we have four charges before us against the President,
two perjury counts, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power.

In Trump's case, the obstruction of justice counts are bogus, generated by their subpoenas being ignored. Being a co-equal branch of government, the Executive Branch can challenge the subpoenas in court. The Democrats declined to follow that path because it interfered with their impeachment timeclock.

There is no evidence of abuse of power.

Just a reminder for ya.

 

[g5000]

******* Clowns is what they are.

‘Abuse of Power Is Not a Crime’: Trump’s Former AG Defines His Credo

One of the four charges by the Republicans against Bill Clinton was abuse of power: IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PURSUANT TO H. RES. 581: CONSIDERATION OF ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT

Today we have four charges before us against the President,
two perjury counts, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power.

In Trump's case, the obstruction of justice counts are bogus, generated by their subpoenas being ignored. Being a co-equal branch of government, the Executive Branch can challenge the subpoenas in court. The Democrats declined to follow that path because it interfered with their impeachment timeclock.

There is no evidence of abuse of power.

Just a reminder for ya.

Trump abused his office by attempting to extort a foreign leader for persona political gain. That's a slam dunk.

As for obstruction, just a reminder for ya:

"Article III of impeachment against Richard Nixon, the article was based on the idea that Richard Nixon, as president, failed to comply with subpoenas of Congress. Congress was going through its oversight function to provide oversight of the president. When asked for information, Richard Nixon chose not to comply, and the Congress of that time said, 'You're taking impeachment away from us. You're becoming the judge and jury. It is not your job to tell us what we need. It is your job to comply with the things we need to provide oversight over you.' The day Richard Nixon failed to answer that subpoena is the day he was subject to impeachment because he took the power from Congress over the impeachment process away from Congress, and he became the judge and jury." - Lindsey Graham, 1998

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

******* Clowns is what they are.

‘Abuse of Power Is Not a Crime’: Trump’s Former AG Defines His Credo

One of the four charges by the Republicans against Bill Clinton was abuse of power: IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PURSUANT TO H. RES. 581: CONSIDERATION OF ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT

Today we have four charges before us against the President,
two perjury counts, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power.

In Trump's case, the obstruction of justice counts are bogus, generated by their subpoenas being ignored. Being a co-equal branch of government, the Executive Branch can challenge the subpoenas in court. The Democrats declined to follow that path because it interfered with their impeachment timeclock.

There is no evidence of abuse of power.

Just a reminder for ya.

Trump abused his office by attempting to extort a foreign leader for persona political gain. That's a slam dunk.

'fraid not. Next?

As for obstruction, just a reminder for ya:

"Article III of impeachment against Richard Nixon, the article was based on the idea that Richard Nixon, as president, failed to comply with subpoenas of Congress. Congress was going through its oversight function to provide oversight of the president. When asked for information, Richard Nixon chose not to comply, and the Congress of that time said, 'You're taking impeachment away from us. You're becoming the judge and jury. It is not your job to tell us what we need. It is your job to comply with the things we need to provide oversight over you.' The day Richard Nixon failed to answer that subpoena is the day he was subject to impeachment because he took the power from Congress over the impeachment process away from Congress, and he became the judge and jury." - Lindsey Graham, 1998

Shrug. That's what Lindsay said. Then. Maybe. So what?

It doesn't change the fact that one branch may challenge the authority of another in the courts. The courts are the referees, and they generally do not support fishing expeditions. That's just how it is. The Democrats chose not to take that path.

You do understand the definition of co-equal, yes? No?

 

[g5000]

******* Clowns is what they are.

‘Abuse of Power Is Not a Crime’: Trump’s Former AG Defines His Credo

One of the four charges by the Republicans against Bill Clinton was abuse of power: IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PURSUANT TO H. RES. 581: CONSIDERATION OF ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT

Today we have four charges before us against the President,
two perjury counts, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power.

In Trump's case, the obstruction of justice counts are bogus, generated by their subpoenas being ignored. Being a co-equal branch of government, the Executive Branch can challenge the subpoenas in court. The Democrats declined to follow that path because it interfered with their impeachment timeclock.

There is no evidence of abuse of power.

Just a reminder for ya.

Trump abused his office by attempting to extort a foreign leader for persona political gain. That's a slam dunk.

'fraid not. Next?

As for obstruction, just a reminder for ya:

"Article III of impeachment against Richard Nixon, the article was based on the idea that Richard Nixon, as president, failed to comply with subpoenas of Congress. Congress was going through its oversight function to provide oversight of the president. When asked for information, Richard Nixon chose not to comply, and the Congress of that time said, 'You're taking impeachment away from us. You're becoming the judge and jury. It is not your job to tell us what we need. It is your job to comply with the things we need to provide oversight over you.' The day Richard Nixon failed to answer that subpoena is the day he was subject to impeachment because he took the power from Congress over the impeachment process away from Congress, and he became the judge and jury." - Lindsey Graham, 1998

Shrug. That's what Lindsay said. Then. Maybe. So what?

It doesn't change the fact that one branch may challenge the authority of another in the courts. The courts are the referees, and they generally do not support fishing expeditions. That's just how it is. The Democrats chose not to take that path.

You do understand the definition of co-equal, yes? No?

Graham will have to vote for the charge of obstruction. By his own standards, Trump is guilty.

But of course he won't, because he's addicted to Trump's cock in his ass.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

******* Clowns is what they are.

‘Abuse of Power Is Not a Crime’: Trump’s Former AG Defines His Credo

One of the four charges by the Republicans against Bill Clinton was abuse of power: IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PURSUANT TO H. RES. 581: CONSIDERATION OF ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT

Today we have four charges before us against the President,
two perjury counts, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power.

In Trump's case, the obstruction of justice counts are bogus, generated by their subpoenas being ignored. Being a co-equal branch of government, the Executive Branch can challenge the subpoenas in court. The Democrats declined to follow that path because it interfered with their impeachment timeclock.

There is no evidence of abuse of power.

Just a reminder for ya.

Trump abused his office by attempting to extort a foreign leader for persona political gain. That's a slam dunk.

'fraid not. Next?

As for obstruction, just a reminder for ya:

"Article III of impeachment against Richard Nixon, the article was based on the idea that Richard Nixon, as president, failed to comply with subpoenas of Congress. Congress was going through its oversight function to provide oversight of the president. When asked for information, Richard Nixon chose not to comply, and the Congress of that time said, 'You're taking impeachment away from us. You're becoming the judge and jury. It is not your job to tell us what we need. It is your job to comply with the things we need to provide oversight over you.' The day Richard Nixon failed to answer that subpoena is the day he was subject to impeachment because he took the power from Congress over the impeachment process away from Congress, and he became the judge and jury." - Lindsey Graham, 1998

Shrug. That's what Lindsay said. Then. Maybe. So what?

It doesn't change the fact that one branch may challenge the authority of another in the courts. The courts are the referees, and they generally do not support fishing expeditions. That's just how it is. The Democrats chose not to take that path.

You do understand the definition of co-equal, yes? No?

Graham will have to vote for the charge of obstruction. By his own standards, Trump is guilty.

But of course he won't, because he's addicted to Trump's cock in his ass.

Your opinion is worth this much.