Democrat Congressman Furious after Trans Congress member was introduced as "Mister"

He can call himself whatever he wants so I suppose any one can.
Would you refer to a crazy white man in black face as an African American, a victim of slavery because he asked you to?
Would you refer to a 40 year old in a diaper and with a pacifier as a baby because they wanted you to?
I know, I know…sounds fucking crazy right?
Where do you think the lunacy is headed?
 
Would you refer to a crazy white man in black face as an African American, a victim of slavery because he asked you to?

I'd likely say "whatever" and go on my way.


Would you refer to a 40 year old in a diaper and with a pacifier as a baby because they wanted you to?
I know, I know…sounds fucking crazy right?
Where do you think the lunacy is headed?

Are you asking me to call you "baby"?
 
he is a dude
transcrazyouyfukkdkd.webp
transgroomershddjdjh.webp
transscienceloljhgjjg.webp
transmemelolddjjdjdjjcnxnddyyrds.webp
transinsanitybskjadkasdhakjdhkajdsa4.webp
 
So you don’t have the nuts to stay serious on the matter?
I am serious. I believe yer type along with Trump's are bullies picking on the weak.Yer type and Trump's are anti- liberty, anti- freedom and suppressors of people, and to me that is nutz.
 
I am serious. I believe yer type along with Trump's are bullies picking on the weak.Yer type and Trump's are anti- liberty, anti- freedom and suppressors of people, and to me that is nutz.

I'd likely say "whatever" and go on my way.




Are you asking me to call you "baby"?
Read your own posts…do you hear how unserious you sound as you squirm trying to defend indefensible lunacy…notice how you always default to some comedic bullshit because you know you can’t stay serious, logical and rational?
This is why sane legit people can’t take you serious…you can only engage with fellow purple haired nose ringers…other crazies.
 
I am serious. I believe yer type along with Trump's are bullies picking on the weak.Yer type and Trump's are anti- liberty, anti- freedom and suppressors of people, and to me that is nutz.
That’s how you wackos lost America…you honestly believe one is bullying or suppressing when they refuse to play along with the crazies.
 
Exactly, which is what happened in this case. Except that the weirdo white knighting for the tranny lost his marbles when someone else referred to Mr. McBride by his legal definition.

I get your point but your example is someone else deciding what to call a person.
 
Executive orders are based on passed laws and direct federal agencies how to implement those laws based on the President's interpretation of those laws.
They are not laws. They cannot override legislation.


To the topic, this is stupid. These people are being paid by us, not to showboat, but to actually do something.
 
They are not laws. They cannot override legislation.


To the topic, this is stupid. These people are being paid by us, not to showboat, but to actually do something.

If you actually read them, they call out the laws they are based on.
 
Irrelevant. They cannot contravene existing or future legislation and can be overturned by the next executive.

And?

They are based on laws passed by congress, and said laws are referenced in them.
 
Why should I care what people call themselves? It means nothing to me.

I don't care what they call themselves either, but it doesn't mean the rest of us have to play along with make believe. I've addressed this before and said the best way to approach this issue with him for people who don't want to affirm his delusions is to say "Representative McBride from Delaware" and leave the labels off. That's how I would go about it.
 
I don't care what they call themselves either, but it doesn't mean the rest of us have to play along with make believe. I've addressed this before and said the best way to approach this issue with him for people who don't want to affirm his delusions is to say "Representative McBride from Delaware" and leave the labels off. That's how I would go about it.

He will find a way to be butthurt about that as well.

The goal is forced acceptance, not tolerance.
 
No, they literally aren't.

Offtopic however.

Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports

Moreover, under Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 (Title IX), educational institutions receiving Federal funds cannot deny women an equal opportunity to participate in sports. As some Federal courts have recognized, “ignoring fundamental biological truths between the two sexes deprives women and girls of meaningful access to educational facilities.” Tennessee v. Cardona, 24-cv-00072 at 73 (E.D. Ky. 2024). See also Kansas v. U.S. Dept. of Education, 24-cv-04041 at 23 (D. Kan. 2024) (highlighting “Congress’ goals of protecting biological women in education”).

He also backs it up with references to court cases.
 
Back
Top Bottom