Dem introduces bills to eliminate electoral college, stop presidents from pardoning themselves

[BS Filter]

Wrong. You're not getting it. You're not understanding the concept of Sovereign States. Each state is a separate government. When you understand that concept, itll all make sense.

Sovereign States? Oh I most certainly do get it. You think that we are still operating under the Articles of Confederation!!

Oh my God. Each state is Sovereign. Are you denying that?

Oh my god! You do not understand the meaning of Sovereignty !!

Definition of SOVEREIGN

It appears that you view the US as a collection of Baltic type states and reject the concept of federal supremacy. Your problem . Not mine
I asked before and I will ask again until I get a reasonable answer. Why is it more important for the "state " to have an equal voice as opposed to each and every individual? Also- just how does the EC make states equal? Take your time

Each state has a Constitution. Governor. State representatives. They are nations. We are not a democracy. You're still not getting it.

They are nations? Holy ******* shit! I am getting it. What I am getting is that you do not believe in the United States of America or the Constitution. And you're idiotically clinging to the idea that the EC gives all states equal voice in selecting the president.

The President is the only office in the land voted on by every citizen.

 

[BS Filter]

We are a nation of states. How else will less populous states have a voice in the Presidential election?

Is that supposed to be an answer? You're STILL not making any sense. The EC does not give the smaller states an equal voice in selecting the president so that is just a non sequitur logical fallacy-in other words bullshit. The only way to ensure that everyone's voice is heard equally is to adapt the popular vote.

Lol
With a pure popular vote, states like Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Idaho etc might as well not even vote... Their votes would not make any difference whatsoever it be a ******* waste of time so shut the **** up you ******* moron

The idea that the EC gives smaller states an equal voice defies logic since that have fewer EC votes. To be more direct- it is ******* stupid. Having said that, why is it more important that "the state " has a equal voice as opposed to each and every individual? Aren't you conservative cranks against government and for the individual? Individual responsibility? Oh right. Only when it suits you .

Lol
With pure popular vote, a city like Minneapolis could overrule five states in the northern plains.
The electoral college is the only protection small states have against overbearing control freak urban areas

With a popular vote, you would not have a president who does not represent the will of the American people . Period

Twisted logic and atrocious grammar. Your twisted logic fulfills the will of the people in California, but disenfranchises the will of the people in Wyoming.

 

[BS Filter]

Is that supposed to be an answer? You're STILL not making any sense. The EC does not give the smaller states an equal voice in selecting the president so that is just a non sequitur logical fallacy-in other words bullshit. The only way to ensure that everyone's voice is heard equally is to adapt the popular vote.

Lol
With a pure popular vote, states like Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Idaho etc might as well not even vote... Their votes would not make any difference whatsoever it be a ******* waste of time so shut the **** up you ******* moron

The idea that the EC gives smaller states an equal voice defies logic since that have fewer EC votes. To be more direct- it is ******* stupid. Having said that, why is it more important that "the state " has a equal voice as opposed to each and every individual? Aren't you conservative cranks against government and for the individual? Individual responsibility? Oh right. Only when it suits you .

Lol
With pure popular vote, a city like Minneapolis could overrule five states in the northern plains.
The electoral college is the only protection small states have against overbearing control freak urban areas

Exactly, and that's why the socialists want to eliminate the EC. They're devious socialists and commies, and all they are about is taking control of this country out of the hands of the hard working patriots.

That is exactly what you right wing fascists want to do.

Oh, for sure. The founding fathers that approved the Constitution were "fascists", huh. This is where it always ends up for you commies.

 

[22lcidw]

I understand you're butthurt from losing two Presidential elections to the Constitution. The Constitution always speaks truth to power. You socialist vermin want to pack metropolitan areas with your voters so you can override the will of the rural citizens and not give them a voice. You cry "fairness", while you work secretly in an unfair manner.

The majority voice of the American people lost two elections to an archaic clause of the Constitution.

How exactly do we "pack metropolitan areas" with our voters, and how does that relate to the issue of the EC? You're not making any sense at all.

We are a nation of states. How else will less populous states have a voice in the Presidential election?

Is that supposed to be an answer? You're STILL not making any sense. The EC does not give the smaller states an equal voice in selecting the president so that is just a non sequitur logical fallacy-in other words bullshit. The only way to ensure that everyone's voice is heard equally is to adapt the popular vote.

Lol
With a pure popular vote, states like Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Idaho etc might as well not even vote... Their votes would not make any difference whatsoever it be a ******* waste of time so shut the **** up you ******* moron

The idea that the EC gives smaller states an equal voice defies logic since that have fewer EC votes. To be more direct- it is ******* stupid. Having said that, why is it more important that "the state " has a equal voice as opposed to each and every individual? Aren't you conservative cranks against government and for the individual? Individual responsibility? Oh right. Only when it suits you .

Fascists/Communists like yourself never leave this weary world. You are throwing away the greatest experiment in human history because of your selfish agendas. Eliminating safeguards in a constitution to tyranny while thinking it does not exist is far worse then the stupidity of any real racist or anyone you consider a hater. The EC exists as a buffer. To think things over. Maybe we need multiple wars on our territory to wise you up. You have seen corrupted people convince us all of people hating when they are not. Schumer and Pelosi can be against a wall now but several years ago they wanted one. And no one questions it. You hope for the death of the aging. But you may go with them.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Sovereign States? Oh I most certainly do get it. You think that we are still operating under the Articles of Confederation!!

Oh my God. Each state is Sovereign. Are you denying that?

Oh my god! You do not understand the meaning of Sovereignty !!

Definition of SOVEREIGN

It appears that you view the US as a collection of Baltic type states and reject the concept of federal supremacy. Your problem . Not mine
I asked before and I will ask again until I get a reasonable answer. Why is it more important for the "state " to have an equal voice as opposed to each and every individual? Also- just how does the EC make states equal? Take your time

Each state has a Constitution. Governor. State representatives. They are nations. We are not a democracy. You're still not getting it.

They are nations? Holy ******* shit! I am getting it. What I am getting is that you do not believe in the United States of America or the Constitution. And you're idiotically clinging to the idea that the EC gives all states equal voice in selecting the president.

The President is the only office in the land voted on by every citizen.

Very profound and insightful! Now please explain how that addresses the points that I made?

 

[BS Filter]

Oh my God. Each state is Sovereign. Are you denying that?

Oh my god! You do not understand the meaning of Sovereignty !!

Definition of SOVEREIGN

It appears that you view the US as a collection of Baltic type states and reject the concept of federal supremacy. Your problem . Not mine
I asked before and I will ask again until I get a reasonable answer. Why is it more important for the "state " to have an equal voice as opposed to each and every individual? Also- just how does the EC make states equal? Take your time

Each state has a Constitution. Governor. State representatives. They are nations. We are not a democracy. You're still not getting it.

They are nations? Holy ******* shit! I am getting it. What I am getting is that you do not believe in the United States of America or the Constitution. And you're idiotically clinging to the idea that the EC gives all states equal voice in selecting the president.

The President is the only office in the land voted on by every citizen.

Very profound and insightful! Now please explain how that addresses the points that I made?

I have addressed your points. The founding fathers addressed your points, and that's why our Constitution has an Electoral College to determine the office of the President.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

The majority voice of the American people lost two elections to an archaic clause of the Constitution.

How exactly do we "pack metropolitan areas" with our voters, and how does that relate to the issue of the EC? You're not making any sense at all.

We are a nation of states. How else will less populous states have a voice in the Presidential election?

Is that supposed to be an answer? You're STILL not making any sense. The EC does not give the smaller states an equal voice in selecting the president so that is just a non sequitur logical fallacy-in other words bullshit. The only way to ensure that everyone's voice is heard equally is to adapt the popular vote.

Lol
With a pure popular vote, states like Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Idaho etc might as well not even vote... Their votes would not make any difference whatsoever it be a ******* waste of time so shut the **** up you ******* moron

The idea that the EC gives smaller states an equal voice defies logic since that have fewer EC votes. To be more direct- it is ******* stupid. Having said that, why is it more important that "the state " has a equal voice as opposed to each and every individual? Aren't you conservative cranks against government and for the individual? Individual responsibility? Oh right. Only when it suits you .

Fascists/Communists like yourself never leave this weary world. You are throwing away the greatest experiment in human history because of your selfish agendas. Eliminating safeguards in a constitution to tyranny while thinking it does not exist is far worse then the stupidity of any real racist or anyone you consider a hater. The EC exists as a buffer. To think things over. Maybe we need multiple wars on our territory to wise you up. You have seen corrupted people convince us all of people hating when they are not. Schumer and Pelosi can be against a wall now but several years ago they wanted one. And no one questions it. You hope for the death of the aging. But you may go with them.

That is quite an unhinged and idiotic rant which makes no sense. You and BS deserve each other. Your blathering about tyranny is just a smoke screen for defending a system that favors a blowhard like Trump to be elected despite being unpopular . Right now we have a tyranny of the minority thanks to the EC system

The founders were not motivated by a concern for Tyranny . They harbored a distrust of the judgement of the public and chose to leave the selection of the electors the state law makers. It was later that voters were allowed to select that after the rise of the two party system. Maybe you would like to go back to have the state lawmakers choose the electors again? Then all you have to do is show how that would prevent tyranny.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Is that supposed to be an answer? You're STILL not making any sense. The EC does not give the smaller states an equal voice in selecting the president so that is just a non sequitur logical fallacy-in other words bullshit. The only way to ensure that everyone's voice is heard equally is to adapt the popular vote.

Lol
With a pure popular vote, states like Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Idaho etc might as well not even vote... Their votes would not make any difference whatsoever it be a ******* waste of time so shut the **** up you ******* moron

The idea that the EC gives smaller states an equal voice defies logic since that have fewer EC votes. To be more direct- it is ******* stupid. Having said that, why is it more important that "the state " has a equal voice as opposed to each and every individual? Aren't you conservative cranks against government and for the individual? Individual responsibility? Oh right. Only when it suits you .

Lol
With pure popular vote, a city like Minneapolis could overrule five states in the northern plains.
The electoral college is the only protection small states have against overbearing control freak urban areas

With a popular vote, you would not have a president who does not represent the will of the American people . Period

Twisted logic and atrocious grammar. Your twisted logic fulfills the will of the people in California, but disenfranchises the will of the people in Wyoming.

Your twisted logic disenfranchises every blue voter in red states and every red voter in blue states

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Lol
With a pure popular vote, states like Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Idaho etc might as well not even vote... Their votes would not make any difference whatsoever it be a ******* waste of time so shut the **** up you ******* moron

The idea that the EC gives smaller states an equal voice defies logic since that have fewer EC votes. To be more direct- it is ******* stupid. Having said that, why is it more important that "the state " has a equal voice as opposed to each and every individual? Aren't you conservative cranks against government and for the individual? Individual responsibility? Oh right. Only when it suits you .

Lol
With pure popular vote, a city like Minneapolis could overrule five states in the northern plains.
The electoral college is the only protection small states have against overbearing control freak urban areas

Exactly, and that's why the socialists want to eliminate the EC. They're devious socialists and commies, and all they are about is taking control of this country out of the hands of the hard working patriots.

That is exactly what you right wing fascists want to do.

Oh, for sure. The founding fathers that approved the Constitution were "fascists", huh. This is where it always ends up for you commies.

Where the **** did I say or imply such a thing. ? Are you hearing voices?

 

[BS Filter]

The idea that the EC gives smaller states an equal voice defies logic since that have fewer EC votes. To be more direct- it is ******* stupid. Having said that, why is it more important that "the state " has a equal voice as opposed to each and every individual? Aren't you conservative cranks against government and for the individual? Individual responsibility? Oh right. Only when it suits you .

Lol
With pure popular vote, a city like Minneapolis could overrule five states in the northern plains.
The electoral college is the only protection small states have against overbearing control freak urban areas

Exactly, and that's why the socialists want to eliminate the EC. They're devious socialists and commies, and all they are about is taking control of this country out of the hands of the hard working patriots.

That is exactly what you right wing fascists want to do.

Oh, for sure. The founding fathers that approved the Constitution were "fascists", huh. This is where it always ends up for you commies.

Where the **** did I say or imply such a thing. ? Are you hearing voices?

Well, the founding fathers are the people that put the EC into the Constitution. Are they fascist or not?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Lol
With pure popular vote, a city like Minneapolis could overrule five states in the northern plains.
The electoral college is the only protection small states have against overbearing control freak urban areas

Exactly, and that's why the socialists want to eliminate the EC. They're devious socialists and commies, and all they are about is taking control of this country out of the hands of the hard working patriots.

That is exactly what you right wing fascists want to do.

Oh, for sure. The founding fathers that approved the Constitution were "fascists", huh. This is where it always ends up for you commies.

Where the **** did I say or imply such a thing. ? Are you hearing voices?

Well, the founding fathers are the people that put the EC into the Constitution. Are they fascist or not?

No, of course they were not. Where is this Fascists crap coming from? I don't think that you actually know what a fascist is. You accuse me of being a Fascist then ask if the founders were Fascists.

 

[BS Filter]

Exactly, and that's why the socialists want to eliminate the EC. They're devious socialists and commies, and all they are about is taking control of this country out of the hands of the hard working patriots.

That is exactly what you right wing fascists want to do.

Oh, for sure. The founding fathers that approved the Constitution were "fascists", huh. This is where it always ends up for you commies.

Where the **** did I say or imply such a thing. ? Are you hearing voices?

Well, the founding fathers are the people that put the EC into the Constitution. Are they fascist or not?

No, of course they were not. Where is this Fascists crap coming from? I don't think that you actually know what a fascist is. You accuse me of being a Fascist then ask if the founders were Fascists.

You must have short-term memory loss. In a few posts back (#540) you accused those of us that defend the EC of being 'fascists".

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

That is exactly what you right wing fascists want to do.

Oh, for sure. The founding fathers that approved the Constitution were "fascists", huh. This is where it always ends up for you commies.

Where the **** did I say or imply such a thing. ? Are you hearing voices?

Well, the founding fathers are the people that put the EC into the Constitution. Are they fascist or not?

No, of course they were not. Where is this Fascists crap coming from? I don't think that you actually know what a fascist is. You accuse me of being a Fascist then ask if the founders were Fascists.

You must have short-term memory loss. In a few posts back (#540) you accused those of us that defend the EC of being 'fascists".

You must have a comprehension problem. I accused you of being a Fascist BUT NOT for supporting the EC

 

[BS Filter]

Oh, for sure. The founding fathers that approved the Constitution were "fascists", huh. This is where it always ends up for you commies.

Where the **** did I say or imply such a thing. ? Are you hearing voices?

Well, the founding fathers are the people that put the EC into the Constitution. Are they fascist or not?

No, of course they were not. Where is this Fascists crap coming from? I don't think that you actually know what a fascist is. You accuse me of being a Fascist then ask if the founders were Fascists.

You must have short-term memory loss. In a few posts back (#540) you accused those of us that defend the EC of being 'fascists".

You must have a comprehension problem. I accused you of being a Fascist BUT NOT for supporting the EC

Oh, okay. Why am I a fascist?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Where the **** did I say or imply such a thing. ? Are you hearing voices?

Well, the founding fathers are the people that put the EC into the Constitution. Are they fascist or not?

No, of course they were not. Where is this Fascists crap coming from? I don't think that you actually know what a fascist is. You accuse me of being a Fascist then ask if the founders were Fascists.

You must have short-term memory loss. In a few posts back (#540) you accused those of us that defend the EC of being 'fascists".

You must have a comprehension problem. I accused you of being a Fascist BUT NOT for supporting the EC

Oh, okay. Why am I a fascist?

Do you not support the demented orange ogre in the white house?

 

[JoeB131]

Fascists/Communists like yourself never leave this weary world. You are throwing away the greatest experiment in human history because of your selfish agendas. Eliminating safeguards in a constitution to tyranny while thinking it does not exist is far worse then the stupidity of any real racist or anyone you consider a hater. The EC exists as a buffer.

Okay, I'll agree. They intended it to be a buffer, but that required the electors to be independent players. That if the people voted for something rash, they'd say, "wait a minute".

That's not what happened in 2016. They just locked stepped in behind the bad idea the people clearly rejected.

You have seen corrupted people convince us all of people hating when they are not. Schumer and Pelosi can be against a wall now but several years ago they wanted one. And no one questions it.

Yeah, let's look at that. Back in the 1990's, when you really did have floods of people coming across the Southern Border, Fencing (Not walls, because that would be stupid) were discussed. Of course, we didn't have a discussion of how NAFTA had wrecked the Mexican Agricultural Economy displacing all those people, because that would be silly. Then we realized it was kind of a stupid idea, and put the emphasis on workplace enforcement where it belonged.

As a result, the number of undocumented immigrants has declined since 2011, and most of those are overstays on visas, not people sneaking across the border.

 

[22lcidw]

We are a nation of states. How else will less populous states have a voice in the Presidential election?

Is that supposed to be an answer? You're STILL not making any sense. The EC does not give the smaller states an equal voice in selecting the president so that is just a non sequitur logical fallacy-in other words bullshit. The only way to ensure that everyone's voice is heard equally is to adapt the popular vote.

Lol
With a pure popular vote, states like Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Idaho etc might as well not even vote... Their votes would not make any difference whatsoever it be a ******* waste of time so shut the **** up you ******* moron

The idea that the EC gives smaller states an equal voice defies logic since that have fewer EC votes. To be more direct- it is ******* stupid. Having said that, why is it more important that "the state " has a equal voice as opposed to each and every individual? Aren't you conservative cranks against government and for the individual? Individual responsibility? Oh right. Only when it suits you .

Fascists/Communists like yourself never leave this weary world. You are throwing away the greatest experiment in human history because of your selfish agendas. Eliminating safeguards in a constitution to tyranny while thinking it does not exist is far worse then the stupidity of any real racist or anyone you consider a hater. The EC exists as a buffer. To think things over. Maybe we need multiple wars on our territory to wise you up. You have seen corrupted people convince us all of people hating when they are not. Schumer and Pelosi can be against a wall now but several years ago they wanted one. And no one questions it. You hope for the death of the aging. But you may go with them.

That is quite an unhinged and idiotic rant which makes no sense. You and BS deserve each other. Your blathering about tyranny is just a smoke screen for defending a system that favors a blowhard like Trump to be elected despite being unpopular . Right now we have a tyranny of the minority thanks to the EC system

The founders were not motivated by a concern for Tyranny . They harbored a distrust of the judgement of the public and chose to leave the selection of the electors the state law makers. It was later that voters were allowed to select that after the rise of the two party system. Maybe you would like to go back to have the state lawmakers choose the electors again? Then all you have to do is show how that would prevent tyranny.

The tyranny was there before Trump. Politicians caused this. One of the reasons are the lies they make in their views. You saw just one by Pelosi/Schumer on how their views changed on the wall. The founders designed a REPUBLIC! It means the tough decisions were made by a political class that did not spend a lifetime at it. at times they failed. We went from a REPUBLIC to a DEMOCRACY in 1913. We started to move from a DEMOCRACY to TYRANNY when World War 2 ended. The Progressive Socialists took control of the Democratic Party in the 1960's. And took complete control a couple of decades later. Republicans have their ways also. It was Franklin who basically spouted...."We gave you a Republic, see if you can keep it"!

 

[hadit]

Well, the founding fathers are the people that put the EC into the Constitution. Are they fascist or not?

No, of course they were not. Where is this Fascists crap coming from? I don't think that you actually know what a fascist is. You accuse me of being a Fascist then ask if the founders were Fascists.

You must have short-term memory loss. In a few posts back (#540) you accused those of us that defend the EC of being 'fascists".

You must have a comprehension problem. I accused you of being a Fascist BUT NOT for supporting the EC

Oh, okay. Why am I a fascist?

Do you not support the demented orange ogre in the white house?

Boy, am I glad we don't have one of those around. They sound scary.

 

[22lcidw]

Fascists/Communists like yourself never leave this weary world. You are throwing away the greatest experiment in human history because of your selfish agendas. Eliminating safeguards in a constitution to tyranny while thinking it does not exist is far worse then the stupidity of any real racist or anyone you consider a hater. The EC exists as a buffer.

Okay, I'll agree. They intended it to be a buffer, but that required the electors to be independent players. That if the people voted for something rash, they'd say, "wait a minute".

That's not what happened in 2016. They just locked stepped in behind the bad idea the people clearly rejected.

You have seen corrupted people convince us all of people hating when they are not. Schumer and Pelosi can be against a wall now but several years ago they wanted one. And no one questions it.

Yeah, let's look at that. Back in the 1990's, when you really did have floods of people coming across the Southern Border, Fencing (Not walls, because that would be stupid) were discussed. Of course, we didn't have a discussion of how NAFTA had wrecked the Mexican Agricultural Economy displacing all those people, because that would be silly. Then we realized it was kind of a stupid idea, and put the emphasis on workplace enforcement where it belonged.

As a result, the number of undocumented immigrants has declined since 2011, and most of those are overstays on visas, not people sneaking across the border.

There was no choice except Ted Cruz. Cruz may have been better but people vote for many reasons and some are not political.Cruz woud get the evangelical vote but the blue dog democrats would have been tough. Again we are led by people who have not had the American people in mind as they were and are globalists. The progressive side is globalist. Many of the Repubs are globalists. You can see them on TV everyday. Joe Scarborough ran as a moderate/conservative for congress. Then the intern died and for some reason left office. Now he spouts like he is reading Chairman Mao's red book. And the political warmongers like Krystal never went to war themselves. And of course he is an anti Trumper. People listened to these hucksters for decades. From Cronkite, Rather, Bernstein and Woodward to so many more when they were not out front with their agendas. Again...we are sodl on agendas by the political class. With Trump he told you what he would do and is trying to do it.

 

[Dragonlady]

I am well aware of the fact that the founders were distrustful of the whims of the voters. So am I. But the EC is not a solution since the electors in each state are selected by the voters. The EC only distorts the outcome. Perhaps you would prefer a dictatorship or a monarchy?

I understand you're butthurt from losing two Presidential elections to the Constitution. The Constitution always speaks truth to power. You socialist vermin want to pack metropolitan areas with your voters so you can override the will of the rural citizens and not give them a voice. You cry "fairness", while you work secretly in an unfair manner.

The majority voice of the American people lost two elections to an archaic clause of the Constitution.

How exactly do we "pack metropolitan areas" with our voters, and how does that relate to the issue of the EC? You're not making any sense at all.

We are a nation of states. How else will less populous states have a voice in the Presidential election?

Is that supposed to be an answer? You're STILL not making any sense. The EC does not give the smaller states an equal voice in selecting the president so that is just a non sequitur logical fallacy-in other words bullshit. The only way to ensure that everyone's voice is heard equally is to adapt the popular vote.

Lol
With a pure popular vote, states like Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Idaho etc might as well not even vote... Their votes would not make any difference whatsoever it be a ******* waste of time so shut the **** up you ******* moron

Given their populations, should their votes make any difference to the direction of the nation? They have a state government to tend to their needs, but in terms of economics, jobs, and the environment, there's not enough people in these states to give them a stake in the game and in the issues affecting MOST Americans.