Debate #1 - Hillary proved to be a scripted, status quo politician.

[ptbw forever]

Maybe they might learn something. Congress gave Reagan the authority to negotiate NAFTA in 1984. The negotiations began under Reagan but most of the negotiations occurred under H.W. Bush. Bill Clinton sighed it into law but had very little to do with the treaty. The agreement was supported by both parties as it is today.

I would think a lot of people would be doing searches on NAFTA. The only thing Trump supporters seem to know about it is what Trump tells them. It certainly is not beneficial to Trump to have his supporters actually researching it. Both Clinton and Trump have said they would like to see changes.

Do you know any Trump supporters, or do you just believe the bullshit, racist caricatures the media constructed?

 

[idb]

No doubt it was an interesting debate. What stood out most was Hillary came off as the typical, status quo politician. Trump truly came off as not a politician. Was Hillary smooth and polished? Overall yes. But Trump spoke from the heart, not from the script - he was far more genuine.

Both candidates got good shots in on each other, but where Trump may have made the biggest impact is - you've been doing this 30 years, thus enforcing in people's minds she's a career politician.

It was really like two separate debates. Hillarry was prepared and Trump was, uh Trump. Hillary addressed the issues and Trump uh, was Trump.

Of course, Hillary won the debate, however as one pundit pointed out, Trump supporters hold Trump to a different set of standards than Hillary because he isn't a "professional" politician. Well here's some news for you Trump supporters. The presidency is a political position. In fact, it's the highest political office in the country, and everything a president does is political. The idea of making Trump the president makes about about as much sense as making Hillary the CEO of the Trump Organization.

What issue did Hillary address?

I did nod off on one of her rants, but I doubt that one rant was any better than the others.

In the very first question she suggested that the US invest in new green technologies.
Someone has to be the leading player in green technologies she said.
Thousands of jobs to be had researching manufacturing and exporting PV panels etc.
Surely that's a no-brainer, if that's what the world wants, then make it and sell it to them.

Of course, his answer was 'Solyndra', which shows that he missed the point entirely, and using tariffs on imports.
Genius!

 

[ptbw forever]

No doubt it was an interesting debate. What stood out most was Hillary came off as the typical, status quo politician. Trump truly came off as not a politician. Was Hillary smooth and polished? Overall yes. But Trump spoke from the heart, not from the script - he was far more genuine.

Both candidates got good shots in on each other, but where Trump may have made the biggest impact is - you've been doing this 30 years, thus enforcing in people's minds she's a career politician.

It was really like two separate debates. Hillarry was prepared and Trump was, uh Trump. Hillary addressed the issues and Trump uh, was Trump.

Of course, Hillary won the debate, however as one pundit pointed out, Trump supporters hold Trump to a different set of standards than Hillary because he isn't a "professional" politician. Well here's some news for you Trump supporters. The presidency is a political position. In fact, it's the highest political office in the country, and everything a president does is political. The idea of making Trump the president makes about about as much sense as making Hillary the CEO of the Trump Organization.

What issue did Hillary address?

I did nod off on one of her rants, but I doubt that one rant was any better than the others.

In the very first question she suggested that the US invest in new green technologies.
Someone has to be the leading player in green technologies she said.
Thousands of jobs to be had researching manufacturing and exporting PV panels etc.
Surely that's a no-brainer, if that's what the world wants, then make it and sell it to them.

Of course, his answer was 'Solyndra', which shows that he missed the point entirely, and using tariffs on imports.
Genius!

Or, maybe we could not do that so that the entire idea that "green energy" as a viable alternative to fossil fuels dies out....

"Green energy" will always be just a secondary source of energy.

 

[idb]

No doubt it was an interesting debate. What stood out most was Hillary came off as the typical, status quo politician. Trump truly came off as not a politician. Was Hillary smooth and polished? Overall yes. But Trump spoke from the heart, not from the script - he was far more genuine.

Both candidates got good shots in on each other, but where Trump may have made the biggest impact is - you've been doing this 30 years, thus enforcing in people's minds she's a career politician.

It was really like two separate debates. Hillarry was prepared and Trump was, uh Trump. Hillary addressed the issues and Trump uh, was Trump.

Of course, Hillary won the debate, however as one pundit pointed out, Trump supporters hold Trump to a different set of standards than Hillary because he isn't a "professional" politician. Well here's some news for you Trump supporters. The presidency is a political position. In fact, it's the highest political office in the country, and everything a president does is political. The idea of making Trump the president makes about about as much sense as making Hillary the CEO of the Trump Organization.

What issue did Hillary address?

I did nod off on one of her rants, but I doubt that one rant was any better than the others.

In the very first question she suggested that the US invest in new green technologies.
Someone has to be the leading player in green technologies she said.
Thousands of jobs to be had researching manufacturing and exporting PV panels etc.
Surely that's a no-brainer, if that's what the world wants, then make it and sell it to them.

Of course, his answer was 'Solyndra', which shows that he missed the point entirely, and using tariffs on imports.
Genius!

Or, maybe we could not do that so that the entire idea that "green energy" as a viable alternative to fossil fuels dies out....

"Green energy" will always be just a secondary source of energy.

Yeah... that might work too...ignore what the rest of the world's doing and they'll just drop the whole 'green energy' thing.

It's funny though...the history of US industry is convincing everyone that they need what industry is building and then selling it to them.

 

[SmokeALib]

No doubt it was an interesting debate. What stood out most was Hillary came off as the typical, status quo politician. Trump truly came off as not a politician. Was Hillary smooth and polished? Overall yes. But Trump spoke from the heart, not from the script - he was far more genuine.

Both candidates got good shots in on each other, but where Trump may have made the biggest impact is - you've been doing this 30 years, thus enforcing in people's minds she's a career politician.

It was really like two separate debates. Hillarry was prepared and Trump was, uh Trump. Hillary addressed the issues and Trump uh, was Trump.

Of course, Hillary won the debate, however as one pundit pointed out, Trump supporters hold Trump to a different set of standards than Hillary because he isn't a "professional" politician. Well here's some news for you Trump supporters. The presidency is a political position. In fact, it's the highest political office in the country, and everything a president does is political. The idea of making Trump the president makes about about as much sense as making Hillary the CEO of the Trump Organization.

What issue did Hillary address?

I did nod off on one of her rants, but I doubt that one rant was any better than the others.

In the very first question she suggested that the US invest in new green technologies.
Someone has to be the leading player in green technologies she said.
Thousands of jobs to be had researching manufacturing and exporting PV panels etc.
Surely that's a no-brainer, if that's what the world wants, then make it and sell it to them.

Of course, his answer was 'Solyndra', which shows that he missed the point entirely, and using tariffs on imports.
Genius!

We don't export PV systems. Like everything else, we import them - mostly from China.
With all the taxes, red tape, and regulations that are forced upon US manufacturers, it's a wonder we manufacture any viable products in this country.

 

[Lumpy 1]

What are you smoking, its more than pot.

Trump was almost Sarah Palin bad when it comes to debating. You must have had your earmuffs on.

Hillary is a lying pig, sorry to burst your bubble.

You miss the point.....that does not matter.

Many don't trust her.

She just needs people to trust Donald less.....he really helped her out tonight.

If he focuses on this debate, he's toast.

You didn't even watch the debate.

Trump was composed the entire time despite Hillary being a total asshole to him the entire debate with the moderator helping her.

Hillary did not look like an expert, and the questions didn't really require Trump to be either.

I've been watching the clips.

He looked terrible.

Even the reasonable Fox people say he sucked.

I take it. "reasonable" to you means the Fox loony lefties...

 

[ptbw forever]

No doubt it was an interesting debate. What stood out most was Hillary came off as the typical, status quo politician. Trump truly came off as not a politician. Was Hillary smooth and polished? Overall yes. But Trump spoke from the heart, not from the script - he was far more genuine.

Both candidates got good shots in on each other, but where Trump may have made the biggest impact is - you've been doing this 30 years, thus enforcing in people's minds she's a career politician.

It was really like two separate debates. Hillarry was prepared and Trump was, uh Trump. Hillary addressed the issues and Trump uh, was Trump.

Of course, Hillary won the debate, however as one pundit pointed out, Trump supporters hold Trump to a different set of standards than Hillary because he isn't a "professional" politician. Well here's some news for you Trump supporters. The presidency is a political position. In fact, it's the highest political office in the country, and everything a president does is political. The idea of making Trump the president makes about about as much sense as making Hillary the CEO of the Trump Organization.

What issue did Hillary address?

I did nod off on one of her rants, but I doubt that one rant was any better than the others.

In the very first question she suggested that the US invest in new green technologies.
Someone has to be the leading player in green technologies she said.
Thousands of jobs to be had researching manufacturing and exporting PV panels etc.
Surely that's a no-brainer, if that's what the world wants, then make it and sell it to them.

Of course, his answer was 'Solyndra', which shows that he missed the point entirely, and using tariffs on imports.
Genius!

Or, maybe we could not do that so that the entire idea that "green energy" as a viable alternative to fossil fuels dies out....

"Green energy" will always be just a secondary source of energy.

Yeah... that might work too...ignore what the rest of the world's doing and they'll just drop the whole 'green energy' thing.

It's funny though...the history of US industry is convincing everyone that they need what industry is building and then selling it to them.

"Green Energy" has been dying off for quite some time, but the renewed interest in the US is reviving it again.

 

[idb]

It was really like two separate debates. Hillarry was prepared and Trump was, uh Trump. Hillary addressed the issues and Trump uh, was Trump.

Of course, Hillary won the debate, however as one pundit pointed out, Trump supporters hold Trump to a different set of standards than Hillary because he isn't a "professional" politician. Well here's some news for you Trump supporters. The presidency is a political position. In fact, it's the highest political office in the country, and everything a president does is political. The idea of making Trump the president makes about about as much sense as making Hillary the CEO of the Trump Organization.

What issue did Hillary address?

I did nod off on one of her rants, but I doubt that one rant was any better than the others.

In the very first question she suggested that the US invest in new green technologies.
Someone has to be the leading player in green technologies she said.
Thousands of jobs to be had researching manufacturing and exporting PV panels etc.
Surely that's a no-brainer, if that's what the world wants, then make it and sell it to them.

Of course, his answer was 'Solyndra', which shows that he missed the point entirely, and using tariffs on imports.
Genius!

Or, maybe we could not do that so that the entire idea that "green energy" as a viable alternative to fossil fuels dies out....

"Green energy" will always be just a secondary source of energy.

Yeah... that might work too...ignore what the rest of the world's doing and they'll just drop the whole 'green energy' thing.

It's funny though...the history of US industry is convincing everyone that they need what industry is building and then selling it to them.

"Green Energy" has been dying off for quite some time, but the renewed interest in the US is reviving it again.

But...that's good isn't it?
Creating an industry out of nothing and making money out of it?
Yay Capitalism!!

 

[ptbw forever]

What issue did Hillary address?

I did nod off on one of her rants, but I doubt that one rant was any better than the others.

In the very first question she suggested that the US invest in new green technologies.
Someone has to be the leading player in green technologies she said.
Thousands of jobs to be had researching manufacturing and exporting PV panels etc.
Surely that's a no-brainer, if that's what the world wants, then make it and sell it to them.

Of course, his answer was 'Solyndra', which shows that he missed the point entirely, and using tariffs on imports.
Genius!

Or, maybe we could not do that so that the entire idea that "green energy" as a viable alternative to fossil fuels dies out....

"Green energy" will always be just a secondary source of energy.

Yeah... that might work too...ignore what the rest of the world's doing and they'll just drop the whole 'green energy' thing.

It's funny though...the history of US industry is convincing everyone that they need what industry is building and then selling it to them.

"Green Energy" has been dying off for quite some time, but the renewed interest in the US is reviving it again.

But...that's good isn't it?
Creating an industry out of nothing and making money out of it?
Yay Capitalism!!

Private companies are only investing as much into green energy as the federal government is mandating.

That is not capitalism.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Democrats are soooooooooooo predictable...

Hillary News speak's and next it's a flock of rabid monkeys invading the USMB .. sheesh ..

 

[Esmeralda]

The beasty had the questions way before hand, she knew what was coming and for a week practiced her lines!

LMAO What bullshit. Your man lost fair and square, and you can't accept it, so you make up bullshit. Pathetic.

 

[Esmeralda]

The beasty had the questions way before hand, she knew what was coming and for a week practiced her lines!

Oh is that why Dump was humiliated on National Television?

Most polls say you're wrong...as usual!

Polls say Trump lost. Accept it.

 

[Esmeralda]

Clinton had the home field advantage - the moderators and the entire media filming it were all liberals bought and paid for

It should have been an unbiased debate but instead it was a very liberal leaning liberal propaganda, Trump had to defend against this and this wasn't a fair debate at all.

There was one moderator dipshit. And he hardly spoke.

Nitwit.

And, the moderator is a Republican. LMAO

 

[Pumpkin Row]

What issue did Hillary address?

I did nod off on one of her rants, but I doubt that one rant was any better than the others.

In the very first question she suggested that the US invest in new green technologies.
Someone has to be the leading player in green technologies she said.
Thousands of jobs to be had researching manufacturing and exporting PV panels etc.
Surely that's a no-brainer, if that's what the world wants, then make it and sell it to them.

Of course, his answer was 'Solyndra', which shows that he missed the point entirely, and using tariffs on imports.
Genius!

Or, maybe we could not do that so that the entire idea that "green energy" as a viable alternative to fossil fuels dies out....

"Green energy" will always be just a secondary source of energy.

Yeah... that might work too...ignore what the rest of the world's doing and they'll just drop the whole 'green energy' thing.

It's funny though...the history of US industry is convincing everyone that they need what industry is building and then selling it to them.

"Green Energy" has been dying off for quite some time, but the renewed interest in the US is reviving it again.

But...that's good isn't it?
Creating an industry out of nothing and making money out of it?
Yay Capitalism!!

Except "green energy" can't compete, so it would be propped up by the government. If it could compete on its own, it would already be a booming business, and people wouldn't be suggesting that the government invest in it. That being the case, it's not Capitalism, but corporate welfare and more government waste.

 

[Esmeralda]

Clinton had the home field advantage - the moderators and the entire media filming it were all liberals bought and paid for

It should have been an unbiased debate but instead it was a very liberal leaning liberal propaganda, Trump had to defend against this and this wasn't a fair debate at all.

Trump campaign says he didn't know debate moderator Lester Holt was a registered Republican

 

[xband]

Obviously Hillary got Botox treatment before the debate and she may have got cheek implants. Is she trying to woo Bill back to her bed chamber?

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Clinton had the home field advantage - the moderators and the entire media filming it were all liberals bought and paid for

It should have been an unbiased debate but instead it was a very liberal leaning liberal propaganda, Trump had to defend against this and this wasn't a fair debate at all.

Trump campaign says he didn't know debate moderator Lester Holt was a registered Republican

Irrelevant. Holt is a proto-human called a negro!

 

[xband]

Variety is a stage and screen newspaper. Trump leading by 10 ten points in the screen and stage actor's guild. Fascinating

 

[Lumpy 1]

Eh, let Esmerelda have some fun...



I've never seen her so happy before....