Death sentence for 18-year old Iranian girl

I sure hope you are right. . . but the 1973 oil crisis that started by Israel's attack on its neighbors had only a fifth of the potential to restrict energy supplies as the current crisis does.

Are you looking forward to this again?

View attachment 1234020

I sure as hell am not. I suppose, some folks think that will be worth it to end the Iranian regime.

:sigh2:
This is late 70’s and not the incident you attributed
 
Many of our posters supporting Fanatic Fundamental Islam oppression here fail to understand that this is a case of "eat the elephant one bite at a time".

Iran's barbaric treatment of it's people is one part, and a smaller one, of the larger equation of why they are the target de jour.
Iran's support (funding, arms, etc.) of it's proxies and their attacks upon Israel and USA, along with Iran's own attacks upon same, is why it's the current focus.
If you need to mischaracterize the arguments folks are making against this, you are admitting that you can't debate them.


Thanks! :113:

anaq31.jpg
 
We have a global economy and I doubt that will change.
 
We have a global economy and I doubt that will change.
I'd be on board if this move was approved by the UN. Why not get a UN resolution if "the world," actually believes Iran is a threat to it?
 
15th post
Many of our posters supporting Fanatic Fundamental Islam oppression here fail to understand that this is a case of "eat the elephant one bite at a time".

Iran's barbaric treatment of it's people is one part, and a smaller one, of the larger equation of why they are the target de jour.
Iran's support (funding, arms, etc.) of it's proxies and their attacks upon Israel and USA, along with Iran's own attacks upon same, is why it's the current focus.

"eat the elephant one bite at a time" Gaza, West Bank, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Iran
 
I did not live during those times.

But I remember all the stories my grandparents told of those times.

I really don't take people very seriously when they compare Iran to fascist Germany, and I really thought you were smarter than to present such an flimsy and idiotic false equivalence fallacy.



My grandparents told me what total war was like. . . the US and its people felt Japan and Germany were existential threats to the US. Likewise, we did not initiate hostilities, they did.

This is not the case here, we attacked Iran while we were in talks with them, just like the Japanese did to us. If Japan was the bad guy in WWII because of its behavior, that can only mean we are the bad guys now. :(

There is NOTHING Iran could ever do to end the U.S., it could only attack us. It's leaders have known better than to do that, unfortunately our don't.




I know there is about 18-20% of Americans that support this military action in Iran. However, if they were told we need to initiate a draft and switch to complete war mobilization in order to destroy the Iranian regime (which is what would be necessary,) I am pretty sure that would drop to single digits.

If such a low percentage of Americans support such action, that makes it illegal and unconstitutional.
Pure, unadulterated bullshit. Iran invaded US territory 47 years ago when they took our embassy, they then committed a war crime when they held our people hostage for 444 days. Thus, the US has been at war with Iran since that time.

Additionally it would take an absolute moron to believe that Iran was negotiating in good faith. You're not a moron...are you?

I thought you were more conversant with history than you now appear to be.
 
Back
Top Bottom