death by vaccination

[Arianrhod]

vacs are for communicable disease.......This is most questionable vac out there........

How do you imagine people get HPV? Magic?

Not on par with measles, diphtheria, chickenpox.......cant sweep thru a community in short order......HPV again is somewhat of a behavioral agent

Nevertheless, it can be transmitted to someone who has not engaged in the behavior.

 

[Flanders]

A teenage girl died just five days after having a cervical cancer jab.

Shazel Zaman, 13, was suffering with a severe headache, vomiting and dizziness after having the jab.

Her symptoms became so severe that her family took her to Bury’s Fairfield Hospital.

To The Great Goose: Good thread.

Vaccinations might do so some good if individuals can refuse. Vaccinations by government force is the horror. My view is that the people must never, under any circumstances, give the government the authority to kill with kindness.

Software billionaire Bill Gates, who previously has advocated the reduction of the human population through the use of vaccines, and his wife Melinda marked the 100th year since the First International Eugenics Congress in London with a “family planning” summit with abortionists and the United Nations.

XXXXX​

In addition to Gates, the meeting included some of the biggest names in the “billionaires club,” according to the London Times, including David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Warren Buffett, George Soros and Michael Bloomberg.

Bill Gates: World needs fewer people
Joins abortionists for 'family planning' conference on eugenics
Published: 08/19/2012 at 4:36 PM
by BOB UNRUH

Bill Gates: World needs fewer people​

 

[Manonthestreet]

and the vac can increase your chances as well as decrease them if prior exposure to hpv but they dont tell you that.....

Evidence?

Peer-reviewed analysis and studies many of them on the FDA, NCI and CDC web sites point out the dangers of many of the vaccine ingredients including the potential for the HPV vaccines to increase the risk for pre-cancerous lesions if adolescents have been previously exposed to the human papillomavirus and then get vaccinated: 44.6% increase post Gardasil.

Judicial Watch writes in their Special Report “Examining The FDA’s HPV Vaccine Records”:

A chart in the committee’s report revealed that efficacy in subjects already exposed to “relevant HPV types” had an observed efficacy rate of -44.6%. The disturbing efficacy rate raises questions as to who should be receiving the vaccine, and why the FDA allows Gardasil to be administered without prescreening for HPV. The outcomes that can result from pre-exposure are disconcerting and deserve far more attention.(8) Your Child. Your Choice.

 

[Moonglow]

A teenage girl died just five days after having a cervical cancer jab.

Shazel Zaman, 13, was suffering with a severe headache, vomiting and dizziness after having the jab.

Her symptoms became so severe that her family took her to Bury’s Fairfield Hospital.

Link?

 

[JakeStarkey]

If you don't want to have your children vaccinated according to the standards of your state's public health department, don't send your children to public school.

 

[Arianrhod]

and the vac can increase your chances as well as decrease them if prior exposure to hpv but they dont tell you that.....

Evidence?

Peer-reviewed analysis and studies many of them on the FDA, NCI and CDC web sites point out the dangers of many of the vaccine ingredients including the potential for the HPV vaccines to increase the risk for pre-cancerous lesions if adolescents have been previously exposed to the human papillomavirus and then get vaccinated: 44.6% increase post Gardasil.

Judicial Watch writes in their Special Report “Examining The FDA’s HPV Vaccine Records”:

A chart in the committee’s report revealed that efficacy in subjects already exposed to “relevant HPV types” had an observed efficacy rate of -44.6%. The disturbing efficacy rate raises questions as to who should be receiving the vaccine, and why the FDA allows Gardasil to be administered without prescreening for HPV. The outcomes that can result from pre-exposure are disconcerting and deserve far more attention.(8) Your Child. Your Choice.

Thank you! And here's the key phrase in your post:

...the potential for the HPV vaccines to increase the risk for pre-cancerous lesions if adolescents have been previously exposed to the human papillomavirus and then get vaccinated: 44.6% increase post Gardasil

Vaccinate before the kid becomes sexually active, eliminate that risk.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Whatever

 

[Arianrhod]

Whatever

You could save yourself a lot of time by making that your go-to post for any topic in this forum. As long as it doesn't affect your health, you don't care. But do you know for sure whether or not it has/will affect your health? You don't, and you're entitled to your ignorance, as long as you don't infect anyone else.

 

[MisterBeale]

Teenage girl dies five days after having the cervical cancer jab

Not you personally, probably, but enough people spread these one in a million stories and the outcome is to discourage parents from having their kids vaccinated. How many deaths are you willing to shoulder for your "interesting" stories?
Poor kid. It was tragic.

The thing about those "deaths," the cervical cancer deaths, those deaths are by choice of those who do or do not want to get the Vac.

So it is ridiculous to force boys to get it. C'mon, let's get real.


If you are the parent of a young teenage son, what is the benefit? Why should you be forced to give them the vac for this one? There is none. On the plus side? Nothing. The down side? Possible death.

If you are the parents of a boy, it really is a no brainer.

 

[MisterBeale]

The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean: Gardasil and Cervarix Don't Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren't Tested
The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean: Gardasil and Cervarix Don't Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren't Tested - The Health Wyze Report


Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment within a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds.


So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.) and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillain Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently -- sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks.


"About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn't, and isn't treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer."


-- Dr. Diane Harper


One must understand how the establishment's word games are played to truly understand the meaning of the above quote, and one needs to understand its unique version of "science". When they report that untreated cases can lead to something that may lead to cervical cancer, it really means that the relationship is merely a hypothetical conjecture that is profitable if people actually believe it. In other words, there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do it nonetheless. There is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer.

 

[Arianrhod]

Teenage girl dies five days after having the cervical cancer jab

Not you personally, probably, but enough people spread these one in a million stories and the outcome is to discourage parents from having their kids vaccinated. How many deaths are you willing to shoulder for your "interesting" stories?
Poor kid. It was tragic.

The thing about those "deaths," the cervical cancer deaths, those deaths are by choice of those who do or do not want to get the Vac.

So it is ridiculous to force boys to get it. C'mon, let's get real.


If you are the parent of a young teenage son, what is the benefit? Why should you be forced to give them the vac for this one? There is none. On the plus side? Nothing. The down side? Possible death.

If you are the parents of a boy, it really is a no brainer.

So you wouldn't care if your son had HPV and potentially infecting any woman he had sex with? You wouldn't care if that infection affected your grandchildren (the percentages are rare, but it happens)?

 

[MisterBeale]

Teenage girl dies five days after having the cervical cancer jab

Not you personally, probably, but enough people spread these one in a million stories and the outcome is to discourage parents from having their kids vaccinated. How many deaths are you willing to shoulder for your "interesting" stories?
Poor kid. It was tragic.

The thing about those "deaths," the cervical cancer deaths, those deaths are by choice of those who do or do not want to get the Vac.

So it is ridiculous to force boys to get it. C'mon, let's get real.


If you are the parent of a young teenage son, what is the benefit? Why should you be forced to give them the vac for this one? There is none. On the plus side? Nothing. The down side? Possible death.

If you are the parents of a boy, it really is a no brainer.

So you wouldn't care if your son had HPV and potentially infecting any woman he had sex with? You wouldn't care if that infection affected your grandchildren (the percentages are rare, but it happens)?

There is scant evidence the vaccine would prevent it, so that would be a straw-man. What do you think I am, and easy victim of propaganda?




. . . . and as I already proved, in the majority of the population, the infection clears itself up within one to two years. No biggie.

There is no mass epidemic of folks getting violently ill. No mass cancer rates. Nothing.


I'm all for informed potential folks that want to get the vac of it's "benefits" and it's "risks," but it shouldn't be pushed on the public as a public health issue. It is something for the individual to decide, not the government. Especially when it can kill you.

I'm willing to bet, this girls parents thought she was required to get it. Such a shame.

 

[Arianrhod]

Teenage girl dies five days after having the cervical cancer jab

Not you personally, probably, but enough people spread these one in a million stories and the outcome is to discourage parents from having their kids vaccinated. How many deaths are you willing to shoulder for your "interesting" stories?
Poor kid. It was tragic.

The thing about those "deaths," the cervical cancer deaths, those deaths are by choice of those who do or do not want to get the Vac.

So it is ridiculous to force boys to get it. C'mon, let's get real.


If you are the parent of a young teenage son, what is the benefit? Why should you be forced to give them the vac for this one? There is none. On the plus side? Nothing. The down side? Possible death.

If you are the parents of a boy, it really is a no brainer.

So you wouldn't care if your son had HPV and potentially infecting any woman he had sex with? You wouldn't care if that infection affected your grandchildren (the percentages are rare, but it happens)?

There is scant evidence the vaccine would prevent it, so that would be a straw-man. What do you think I am, and easy victim of propaganda?




. . . . and as I already proved, in the majority of the population, the infection clears itself up within one to two years. No biggie.

There is no mass epidemic of folks getting violently ill. No mass cancer rates. Nothing.


I'm all for informed potential folks that want to get the vac of it's "benefits" and it's "risks," but it shouldn't be pushed on the public as a public health issue. It is something for the individual to decide, not the government. Especially when it can kill you.

I'm willing to bet, this girls parents thought she was required to get it. Such a shame.

So do you approach every subject with confirmation bias (if you believe it, it's evidence; if you don't, it's propaganda) or just health topics?

As for this particular tragic case, the doctors in the ER did not do their jobs. Dismissing her symptoms as "a stomach bug" after her parents mentioned the injection (if her reaction was that severe, she'd have had redness and swelling at the injection site that should have been obvious) is gross negligence and, IMO, actionable.

 

[MisterBeale]

Teenage girl dies five days after having the cervical cancer jab

Not you personally, probably, but enough people spread these one in a million stories and the outcome is to discourage parents from having their kids vaccinated. How many deaths are you willing to shoulder for your "interesting" stories?
Poor kid. It was tragic.

The thing about those "deaths," the cervical cancer deaths, those deaths are by choice of those who do or do not want to get the Vac.

So it is ridiculous to force boys to get it. C'mon, let's get real.


If you are the parent of a young teenage son, what is the benefit? Why should you be forced to give them the vac for this one? There is none. On the plus side? Nothing. The down side? Possible death.

If you are the parents of a boy, it really is a no brainer.

So you wouldn't care if your son had HPV and potentially infecting any woman he had sex with? You wouldn't care if that infection affected your grandchildren (the percentages are rare, but it happens)?

There is scant evidence the vaccine would prevent it, so that would be a straw-man. What do you think I am, and easy victim of propaganda?




. . . . and as I already proved, in the majority of the population, the infection clears itself up within one to two years. No biggie.

There is no mass epidemic of folks getting violently ill. No mass cancer rates. Nothing.


I'm all for informed potential folks that want to get the vac of it's "benefits" and it's "risks," but it shouldn't be pushed on the public as a public health issue. It is something for the individual to decide, not the government. Especially when it can kill you.

I'm willing to bet, this girls parents thought she was required to get it. Such a shame.

So do you approach every subject with confirmation bias (if you believe it, it's evidence; if you don't, it's propaganda) or just health topics?

As for this particular tragic case, the doctors in the ER did not do their jobs. Dismissing her symptoms as "a stomach bug" after her parents mentioned the injection (if her reaction was that severe, she'd have had redness and swelling at the injection site that should have been obvious) is gross negligence and, IMO, actionable.

Nope. Just going by what one of the researchers of the vac. admitted to.

 

[Syriusly]

A teenage girl died just five days after having a cervical cancer jab.

Shazel Zaman, 13, was suffering with a severe headache, vomiting and dizziness after having the jab.

Her symptoms became so severe that her family took her to Bury’s Fairfield Hospital.

Not you personally, probably, but enough people spread these one in a million stories and the outcome is to discourage parents from having their kids vaccinated. How many deaths are you willing to shoulder for your "interesting" stories?
Poor kid. It was tragic.

The thing about those "deaths," the cervical cancer deaths, those deaths are by choice of those who do or do not want to get the Vac.

So it is ridiculous to force boys to get it. C'mon, let's get real.


If you are the parent of a young teenage son, what is the benefit? Why should you be forced to give them the vac for this one? There is none. On the plus side? Nothing. The down side? Possible death.

If you are the parents of a boy, it really is a no brainer.

So you wouldn't care if your son had HPV and potentially infecting any woman he had sex with? You wouldn't care if that infection affected your grandchildren (the percentages are rare, but it happens)?

There is scant evidence the vaccine would prevent it, so that would be a straw-man. What do you think I am, and easy victim of propaganda?




. . . . and as I already proved, in the majority of the population, the infection clears itself up within one to two years. No biggie.

There is no mass epidemic of folks getting violently ill. No mass cancer rates. Nothing.


I'm all for informed potential folks that want to get the vac of it's "benefits" and it's "risks," but it shouldn't be pushed on the public as a public health issue. It is something for the individual to decide, not the government. Especially when it can kill you.

I'm willing to bet, this girls parents thought she was required to get it. Such a shame.

So do you approach every subject with confirmation bias (if you believe it, it's evidence; if you don't, it's propaganda) or just health topics?

As for this particular tragic case, the doctors in the ER did not do their jobs. Dismissing her symptoms as "a stomach bug" after her parents mentioned the injection (if her reaction was that severe, she'd have had redness and swelling at the injection site that should have been obvious) is gross negligence and, IMO, actionable.

Nope. Just going by what one of the researchers of the vac. admitted to.

Well lets go with what Dr. Harper said

n a 2012 peer-reviewed article about Cervarix, Dr. Harper states that “Cervarix is an excellent choice for both screened and unscreened populations due to its long-lasting protection, its broad protection for at least five oncogenic HPV types, the potential to use only one-dose for the same level of protection, and its safety.

More about what Dr. Harper actually said

• Dr. Ben Goldacre, who consistently writes about making drug companies accountable for their actions and exaggerated claims, actually interviewed Dr. Harper after the antivaccine world exploded with this information. She told Goldacre that “I fully support the HPV vaccines. I believe that in general they are safe in most women.”
  
  

 

[Arianrhod]

Not you personally, probably, but enough people spread these one in a million stories and the outcome is to discourage parents from having their kids vaccinated. How many deaths are you willing to shoulder for your "interesting" stories?
Poor kid. It was tragic.

The thing about those "deaths," the cervical cancer deaths, those deaths are by choice of those who do or do not want to get the Vac.

So it is ridiculous to force boys to get it. C'mon, let's get real.


If you are the parent of a young teenage son, what is the benefit? Why should you be forced to give them the vac for this one? There is none. On the plus side? Nothing. The down side? Possible death.

If you are the parents of a boy, it really is a no brainer.

So you wouldn't care if your son had HPV and potentially infecting any woman he had sex with? You wouldn't care if that infection affected your grandchildren (the percentages are rare, but it happens)?

There is scant evidence the vaccine would prevent it, so that would be a straw-man. What do you think I am, and easy victim of propaganda?




. . . . and as I already proved, in the majority of the population, the infection clears itself up within one to two years. No biggie.

There is no mass epidemic of folks getting violently ill. No mass cancer rates. Nothing.


I'm all for informed potential folks that want to get the vac of it's "benefits" and it's "risks," but it shouldn't be pushed on the public as a public health issue. It is something for the individual to decide, not the government. Especially when it can kill you.

I'm willing to bet, this girls parents thought she was required to get it. Such a shame.

So do you approach every subject with confirmation bias (if you believe it, it's evidence; if you don't, it's propaganda) or just health topics?

As for this particular tragic case, the doctors in the ER did not do their jobs. Dismissing her symptoms as "a stomach bug" after her parents mentioned the injection (if her reaction was that severe, she'd have had redness and swelling at the injection site that should have been obvious) is gross negligence and, IMO, actionable.

Nope. Just going by what one of the researchers of the vac. admitted to.

And you don't think the ER staff was negligent in this case? There are ways to treat bad reactions to medications. It seems clear to me that if the doctors hadn't shrugged the parents off, they might have saved this girl.

 

[MisterBeale]

Hey, you folks want to stick yourself, go ahead. Just don't force the rest of us to live in your big-pharma, profit driven world. Some ailments are nonsense. The risk isn't worth the jab.