So is this you transferring your unacceptable beliefs onto me??
And yet I ask questions that you avoid. LOL I wonder why you avoid them? Oops that's another question. LOL
That's funny considereing the fact that you are the one that was busted for mischaracterizing me when you tried to spin my statement to mean something that I clearly did not say.
And yet you are the one that mischaracterized what I said as you tried to put me into one of your slots, neatly wrapped up and miscatorgized. LOL
wow, more baseless personal attacks from you. LOL imagine that.
Hey, you were the one that mischaracterized my statement and it really doesn't matter if it was intentionally based on dishonesty or a mistake based on ignorance. Either way, you were wrong and if you were honest and had any integrity you would admit it. However, it does look like you answered my question with your actions. You dishonest attempts to discredit me for pointing out your mischaracterization shows you to be a liar.
LOL funny that this actually describes your posts to a t. Your posts start with baseless attacks and they end with them.
Is this supposed to be a question??
You can Keep your excuses.
Who is offering excuses?? Fact is that you dishonestly tried to mischaracterize my statement, I pointed to how and where you did it and instead of admitting to your dishonesty you engaged in baseless personal attacks in a scorched earth like rant to try to tear me down and miscatorgize me as you try to attack me claiming I am doing the same. That only makes you look foolish, hypocritical and more dishonest than you did to begin with. LOL
Highly gay s0n..................Is Dr Smith still yapping.
I'm tempted to pop him off ignore and see if he is hacking apart posts to misrepresent what people say again or if he is providing good solid arguments.
Not tempted enough this early thought
So is this you transferring your unacceptable beliefs onto me??
And yet I ask questions that you avoid. LOL I wonder why you avoid them? Oops that's another question. LOL
That's funny considereing the fact that you are the one that was busted for mischaracterizing me when you tried to spin my statement to mean something that I clearly did not say.
And yet you are the one that mischaracterized what I said as you tried to put me into one of your slots, neatly wrapped up and miscatorgized. LOL
wow, more baseless personal attacks from you. LOL imagine that.
Hey, you were the one that mischaracterized my statement and it really doesn't matter if it was intentionally based on dishonesty or a mistake based on ignorance. Either way, you were wrong and if you were honest and had any integrity you would admit it. However, it does look like you answered my question with your actions. You dishonest attempts to discredit me for pointing out your mischaracterization shows you to be a liar.
LOL funny that this actually describes your posts to a t. Your posts start with baseless attacks and they end with them.
Is this supposed to be a question??
You can Keep your excuses.
Who is offering excuses?? Fact is that you dishonestly tried to mischaracterize my statement, I pointed to how and where you did it and instead of admitting to your dishonesty you engaged in baseless personal attacks in a scorched earth like rant to try to tear me down and miscatorgize me as you try to attack me claiming I am doing the same. That only makes you look foolish, hypocritical and more dishonest than you did to begin with. LOL
Smith ............geeeez. You gotta buckle up your chinstrap s0n and grow some leather on that thin skin of yours. Nobody cares you've been personally attacked s0n.........
Caring about what strangers think of you isnt a recipe for resiliency in life................
so please............stop taking uop band width with your tales of woe, "Ive been hurt by your words!!!"
I just noticed this. What an idiot.If you think I'm here to be slick, you're wrong. I have better things to do than to try to be 'slick' on some forum.
Since all you are doing is trying to do is be slick, I have to ask, What are you doing here if you really have better things to do? LOL
Says the poster who has tried to avoid substantiating his claim with nothing but a lot of SPIN.
You have said alot of things and proven nothing. Typical and expected.
Didn't you try to make that comparison when you were talking about how they intersect?
I just noticed this. What an idiot.If you think I'm here to be slick, you're wrong. I have better things to do than to try to be 'slick' on some forum.
Since all you are doing is trying to do is be slick, I have to ask, What are you doing here if you really have better things to do? LOL
Says the poster who has tried to avoid substantiating his claim with nothing but a lot of SPIN.
You have said alot of things and proven nothing. Typical and expected.
Didn't you try to make that comparison when you were talking about how they intersect?
It doesn't prove much of anything you've written, but it certainly does demonstrate your lack of comprehension or that you don't bother reading threads before posting. If one did either of those, I would think they would be mortified to post what you did.
It doesn't prove much of anything you've written, but it certainly does demonstrate your lack of comprehension or that you don't bother reading threads before posting. If one did either of those, I would think they would be mortified to post what you did.
Carry on.
Bloggers claim photo shows millions at "tea party" protest
Bookmark this story:
Buzz up!ShareThis
Bloggers said this photo showed a gargantuan crowd at Saturday's "tea party" protest. But it apparently was taken in 1997 at a Promise Keepers rally.
In the competitive world of Washington protests, crowd size is often a matter of dispute. Organizers usually boast of huge crowds, while police and the news media offer much smaller estimates.
So supporters of Saturdays tea party protests against President Barack Obama were quick to highlight their big turnout. To bolster countless claims on blogs and Facebook, many posted a photograph that showed a gargantuan crowd sprawling from Capitol Hill down the National Mall to the Washington Monument.
But it turns out the photo is more than 10 years old, apparently taken during a 1997 Promise Keepers rally.
PolitiFact | Bloggers claim photo shows millions at "tea party" protest
bummer for you ijits that number's a lie...
*shrug*
but y'all keep repeating it...maybe you won't feel like such loons.
Bloggers claim photo shows millions at "tea party" protest
Bookmark this story:
Buzz up!ShareThis
Bloggers said this photo showed a gargantuan crowd at Saturday's "tea party" protest. But it apparently was taken in 1997 at a Promise Keepers rally.
In the competitive world of Washington protests, crowd size is often a matter of dispute. Organizers usually boast of huge crowds, while police and the news media offer much smaller estimates.
So supporters of Saturdays tea party protests against President Barack Obama were quick to highlight their big turnout. To bolster countless claims on blogs and Facebook, many posted a photograph that showed a gargantuan crowd sprawling from Capitol Hill down the National Mall to the Washington Monument.
But it turns out the photo is more than 10 years old, apparently taken during a 1997 Promise Keepers rally.
PolitiFact | Bloggers claim photo shows millions at "tea party" protest
Jillian, imagine there were less than 20k. How would the turn the story?
