Dante versus Antares POLL moved here...

Dante versus Antares Wealth Re-Distribution: And the winner is...

  • Dante

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tie

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
  • Poll closed .

Dante

On leave
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
52,462
Reaction score
3,365
Points
1,825
Location
On leave
The debate is here:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-b...ness-achieved-with-wealth-redistribution.html

Any comments and dscussion of that debate by members goes HERE in this thread.

Tbere was another debate thread with the poll included there, but members were confused over how the Bull Ring works. Dante apologizes for any confusion. :D:

Dante
:cool:

The poll is here with 3 choices. Feel free to.vote principle or heart.

The loser will agree to use an avatar for the month of December, selected by the membership at large
 

Yurt

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
Messages
25,603
Reaction score
3,599
Points
270
Location
Hot air ballon
i thought the loser would self ban for a month....screw you dante
 
OP
Dante

Dante

On leave
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
52,462
Reaction score
3,365
Points
1,825
Location
On leave
i thought the loser would self ban for a month....screw you dante
Antares and Dante had to agree. Are you as consistently a moron in all spheres of life or only here?
 

Listening

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
1,647
Points
260
The premise of the debate is something that I am not sure I understand.

Is this somehow implying that wealth distribution would be a good thing in today's day and age ?
 
OP
Dante

Dante

On leave
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
52,462
Reaction score
3,365
Points
1,825
Location
On leave
Yurt squirt his load and came up empty
 

emilynghiem

Constitutionalist / Universalist
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
22,035
Reaction score
3,127
Points
290
Location
National Freedmen's Town District
NOTE: to show support for Dante in addressing this issue at all,
I would be willing to offer my vote to Dante to balance it and show some "redistribution"
to encourage INCLUSION and participate by equal respect for all views, even if I disagree.

If the point of interacting is to share both sides and reach an understanding,
I value that interaction and purpose; and it doesn't matter so much to me who votes for which side, what matters is if we resolve the conflict and reach an agreed conclusion.

bump

[MENTION=40954]Antares[/MENTION]
Sorry I missed this.

I would say USA greatness was DESPITE the flaws of abusing free market
as capitalism to SEIZE property from others, as in Hawaii and disenfranchising
Blacks from owning property or even their own bodies.

That is not redistribution of wealth but imperialism.
There are good things that came from corporate investment for profit
but also bad things from abuses we are still addressing today.

The ideal system would be where people apply and follow different systems
that work for different situations, but by free will and collaborative partnership.
So if you have pockets of socialism or capitalism, etc., they are still checked
by Constitutional principles to make sure there are no abuses against individuals.
But they are operated and managed by voluntary participation or free choice.
 

New Posts

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Top