D.C. Residents Want Trump To Cut Their Grass Because He's Cleaning Up Crime

[MarathonMike]

Crime is down in DC. What happened to big balls happens all over the country and it's not restricted to one race.

Your wife has psychological problems. Your wife hates other black people. And you use her self-hate to validate your own bias. Your wife doesn't spea fr or represent every black person. If someone white said the white community is like crabs, you would dismiss that comment as a self hating white person. But a black person says it and you post it as some kind of "evidence" to try degrading black people. Trump is doing this because he knows his racist base will suck it up, and to get the attention away from Epstein. This is his tactic. When shit hits the fan on him, do the race hustle.

Democrats playing games with crime statistics to cover up their total failure of leadership. WHY DOES MAYOR BOWSER AGREE WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP FEDERALIZING D.C.? ARE YOU CALLING MAYOR BOWSER A FASCIST LIAR IM2?

 

[mudwhistle]

Crime is down in DC. What happened to big balls happens all over the country and it's not restricted to one race.

Your wife has psychological problems. Your wife hates other black people. And you use her self-hate to validate your own bias. Your wife doesn't spea fr or represent every black person. If someone white said the white community is like crabs, you would dismiss that comment as a self hating white person. But a black person says it and you post it as some kind of "evidence" to try degrading black people. Trump is doing this because he knows his racist base will suck it up, and to get the attention away from Epstein. This is his tactic. When shit hits the fan on him, do the race hustle.

My wife doesn't have psychological problems because she died from cancer in January.

And she developed her beliefs thru living thru the tail-end of the Great Depression and growing up in Philly and Washington D.C., after leaving her family's home working as a field hand on a farm in Alabama since she was 2 years old. Blacks who live in rural communities are totally different from city blacks. I discovered this is true here and over in Somalia.

I was my wife's third husband. After two abusive marriages to black husbands who liked beating the shit out of her every time they got in an argument with their girlfriends, she decided that getting into neighborhoods that were as far away from black neighborhoods was her best bet. She married me and we stayed married thru thick and thin for over 46 years.

She learned that people are people, and hating whites was an excuse that blacks use to blame all of their shortcomings on. The only people you should be blaming for your lot in life is yourself. Your failure to become a productive member of society is totally on you.

 

[MarathonMike]

My wife doesn't have psychological problems because she died from cancer in January.

And she developed her beliefs thru living thru the tail-end of the Great Depression and growing up in Philly and Washington D.C., after leaving her family's home working as a field hand on a farm in Alabama since she was 2 years old. Blacks who live in rural communities are totally different from city blacks. I discovered this is true here and over in Somalia.

I was my wife's third husband. After two abusive marriages to black husbands who liked beating the shit out of her every time they got in an argument with their girlfriends, she decided that getting into neighborhoods that were as far away from black neighborhoods was her best bet. She married me and we stayed married thru thick and thin for over 46 years.

She learned that people are people, and hating whites was an excuse that blacks use to blame all of their shortcomings on. The only people you should be blaming for your lot in life is yourself. Your failure to become a productive member of society is totally on you.

Thanks for sharing that. I personally think the most interesting and thought provoking posts are where one relates their personal experiences. Notice that in over a decade IM2 has not done that ONCE. He is a pure race baiter, full of hate and ignores the truth, even though he constantly posts threads claiming he alone knows the "truth".

 

[Woodznutz]

White crime is higher and whites lead in theft annualy, both property theft and white collar theft. Denial of white criminality is the cutural problem and your post is evidence of it.

My post includes southern whites and whites from the south.

 

[Blaster]

Trump is fighting crime in DC and being bashed by Democrats.

 

[IM2]

My post includes southern whites and whites from the south.

IDGAF. What you said was untrue. Furthermore, crime is down in DC, and the approach Trump is taking is the lazy approach.

 

[Woodznutz]

IDGAF. What you said was untrue.

I read this in an article on the subject. Sounded reasonable to me.

 

[MarathonMike]

IDGAF. What you said was untrue. Furthermore, crime is down in DC, and the approach Trump is taking is the lazy approach.

Still dodging and deflecting because IM2 KNOWS he has no ground to stand on. FAIL

 

[mudwhistle]

IDGAF. What you said was untrue. Furthermore, crime is down in DC, and the approach Trump is taking is the lazy approach.

The lazy approach because it doesn't involve reparations.

 

[Blaster]

IDGAF. What you said was untrue. Furthermore, crime is down in DC, and the approach Trump is taking is the lazy approach.

Carjackings and juvenile crime has increased in DC.

 

[mudwhistle]

Carjackings and juvenile crime has increased in DC.

 

[Blaster]

Democrats love crime.

 

[MarathonMike]

The lazy approach because it doesn't involve reparations.

View attachment 1147795

Let's not forget the George Zimmeran doll, the "White Hispanic".

 

[mudwhistle]

White crime is higher and whites lead in theft annualy, both property theft and white collar theft. Denial of white criminality is the cutural problem and your post is evidence of it.

 

[mudwhistle]

Let's not forget the George Zimmeran doll, the "White Hispanic".

As opposed to being possibly white.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

In fairness, Trump is probably being played here by the Establishment who want him to lose power in the midterms.

I don't see much, if any gain he will get by his position on "taking control of D.C". It is red meat for people who will vote for him anyways. He certainly doesn't have any voters in D.C who will flip the script there.

When Paul Ryan and Fox News cheer this on, you know there is a concerted effort.

I believe it is pay back for the mayor.

 

[Rawley]

I don't see much, if any gain he will get by his position on "taking control of D.C".

Less violence in DC? You don't see that as a gain?

 

[shockedcanadian]

Less violence in DC? You don't see that as a gain?

Federally? It doesn't help him at all. Crime is a very complicated issue, deploying the national guards is going to decrease the murder rate how exactly? You have to get ahead of crime, it's a social issue, you don't do much after a crime has occurred except maybe make arrests (which is important of course).

He already has the vote of Conservatives. He needs the libertarians and independents and they are a fickle bunch. I'd say the Epstein case and Bibis decisions in Gaza are hurting him more with young voters before the midterms than this issue in D.C. A place he's never going to win anyways even if crime was eliminated and gang members joined the Boy Scouts.

I understand this issue goes beyond politics so I am not measuring his decision solely on this parameter, but, I am stating from a political standpoint, this decision won't move the needle much if any. It will allow Dems some room for criticism though.

As my suspicions of this, I watched the presser today and one question was purposely asked, "will you be using this model across other cities"? Then the journalists named some cities. Why? He wants to give MSM an angle to promote, "Trump may apply this across the nation!". They want to give them an opportunity to paint him as a King, not a leader of 50 States.

I saw such a headline on CNN and other mainstream media outlets. Dems are given a free shot now, even if it doesnt hit hard Again, that's just me analyzing this decision politically. There are always going to be wolfs in sheeps clothing around him you cam be sure of that. He is still the outsider. Neither a Neo-Con, nor a Neo-Liberal.

Let me give you an example of what I think is bad suggestions by apparent allies. I heard Charlie Kirk pleading with Trump not to lower the drug class of weed. First, Kirk has never been overly impressive to me, very hit and miss. He has been great at debating college kids and leading a younger generation. If he is trying to suggest that the younger generation do NOT agree with Trumps position on weed, than he is almost certainly outright lying or out of touch.

One of Reagans biggest failures was his approach to the war on drugs. By Trump decreasing the status of the drug it is a smart decision that breaks the stereotype that the Dems have pigeon holed GOP on. It is exactly these types of positions that he is famous for surprising people on because it continually weakens Dem attack points. What can they say? "Trump is going soft on weed!"?

I dont smoke but how many lives have been destroyed and billions spent trying to chase young people around who experimented in smoking a fairly innocent plant? I guarantee you if you had a national poll that his position would probably overwhelmingly win. There are times I am against it, but the majority of people I see walking into dispensaries here are over the age of 60. They probably smoked when they were younger and it decreases their aches and pains.

I've always felt that drinking kills FAR more people, directly and indirectly. Also, why are cigarettes legal? Let's fine some common sense on the issue.

I digress. His D.C decision is hopefully successful and addresses the right kinds of criminals. I can tell you when I was young the worst criminals all became cops, take that for what you will. I would recommend some outreach to prevent before someone takes the wrong path. Give kids hope with options.

If they can save some lives that's great, but I guarantee you the "he's a dictator and is trying to deflect from Epstein and wars around the world" is going to be the Dems response. Rightfully or wrongfully,, they are in politics mode 24/7.

 

[Rawley]

Federally? It doesn't help him at all. Crime is a very complicated issue, deploying the national guards is going to decrease the murder rate how exactly? You have to get ahead of crime, it's a social issue, you don't do much after a crime has occurred except maybe make arrests (which is important of course).

He already has the vote of Conservatives. He needs the libertarians and independents and they are a fickle bunch. I'd say the Epstein case and Bibis decisions in Gaza are hurting him more with young voters before the midterms than this issue in D.C. A place he's never going to win anyways even if crime was eliminated and gang members joined the Boy Scouts.

I understand this issue goes beyond politics so I am not measuring his decision solely on this parameter, but, I am stating from a political standpoint, this decision won't move the needle much if any. It will allow Dems some room for criticism though.

As my suspicions of this, I watched the presser today and one question was purposely asked, "will you be using this model across other cities"? Then the journalists named some cities. Why? He wants to give MSM an angle to promote, "Trump may apply this across the nation!". They want to give them an opportunity to point him as a King, not a leader of 50 States.

I saw such a headline on CNN and other mainstream media outlets. Dems are given a free shot now, even if it doesnt hit hard Again, that's just me analyzing this decision politically. There are always going to be wolfs in sheeps clothing around him you cam be sure of that. He is still the outsider. Neither a Neo-Con, nor a Neo-Liberal.

Let me give you an example of what I think is bad suggestions by apparent allies. I heard Charlie Kirk pleading with Trump not to lower the drug class of weed. First, Kirk has never been overly impressive to me, very hit and miss. He has been great at debating college kids and leading a younger generation. If he is trying to suggest that the younger generation do NOT agree with Trumps position on weed, than he is almost certainly outright lying or out of touch.

One of Reagans biggest failures was his approach to the war on drugs. By Trump decreasing the status of the drug it is a smart decision that breaks the stereotype that the Dems have pigeon holed GOP on. It is exactly these types of positions that he is famous for surprising people on because it continually weakens Dem attack points. What can they say? "Trump is going soft on weed!"?

I dont smoke but how many lives have been destroyed and billions spent trying to chase young people around who experimented in smoking a fairly innocent plant? I guarantee you if you had a national poll that his position would probably overwhelmingly win. There are times I am against it, but the majority of peopel I see walking into dispensaries here are over the age of 60. They probably smoked when they were younger and it decreases their aches and pains.

I've always felt that drinking kills FAR more people, directly and indirectly. Also, why are cigarettes legal? Let's fine some common sense on the issue.

I digress. His D.C decision is hopefully successful and addresses the right kinds of criminals. I can tell you when I was young the worst criminals all became cops, take that for what you will. I would recommend some outreach to prevent before someone takes the wrong path. Give kids hope with options.

If they can save some lives that's great, but I guarantee you the "he's a dictator and is trying to deflect from Epstein and wars around the world" is going to be the Dems response. Rightfully or wrongfully,, they are in politics mode 24/7.

Hmmm. Seems you're saying politicians should only do the things they believe are going to benefit themselves politically. I don't think that's right. If they think it's the right thing to do, they so do it, regards of the politics.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Federally? It doesn't help him at all. Crime is a very complicated issue, deploying the national guards is going to decrease the murder rate how exactly? You have to get ahead of crime, it's a social issue, you don't do much after a crime has occurred except maybe make arrests (which is important of course).

He already has the vote of Conservatives. He needs the libertarians and independents and they are a fickle bunch. I'd say the Epstein case and Bibis decisions in Gaza are hurting him more with young voters before the midterms than this issue in D.C. A place he's never going to win anyways even if crime was eliminated and gang members joined the Boy Scouts.

I understand this issue goes beyond politics so I am not measuring his decision solely on this parameter, but, I am stating from a political standpoint, this decision won't move the needle much if any. It will allow Dems some room for criticism though.

As my suspicions of this, I watched the presser today and one question was purposely asked, "will you be using this model across other cities"? Then the journalists named some cities. Why? He wants to give MSM an angle to promote, "Trump may apply this across the nation!". They want to give them an opportunity to point him as a King, not a leader of 50 States.

I saw such a headline on CNN and other mainstream media outlets. Dems are given a free shot now, even if it doesnt hit hard Again, that's just me analyzing this decision politically. There are always going to be wolfs in sheeps clothing around him you cam be sure of that. He is still the outsider. Neither a Neo-Con, nor a Neo-Liberal.

Let me give you an example of what I think is bad suggestions by apparent allies. I heard Charlie Kirk pleading with Trump not to lower the drug class of weed. First, Kirk has never been overly impressive to me, very hit and miss. He has been great at debating college kids and leading a younger generation. If he is trying to suggest that the younger generation do NOT agree with Trumps position on weed, than he is almost certainly outright lying or out of touch.

One of Reagans biggest failures was his approach to the war on drugs. By Trump decreasing the status of the drug it is a smart decision that breaks the stereotype that the Dems have pigeon holed GOP on. It is exactly these types of positions that he is famous for surprising people on because it continually weakens Dem attack points. What can they say? "Trump is going soft on weed!"?

I dont smoke but how many lives have been destroyed and billions spent trying to chase young people around who experimented in smoking a fairly innocent plant? I guarantee you if you had a national poll that his position would probably overwhelmingly win. There are times I am against it, but the majority of peopel I see walking into dispensaries here are over the age of 60. They probably smoked when they were younger and it decreases their aches and pains.

I've always felt that drinking kills FAR more people, directly and indirectly. Also, why are cigarettes legal? Let's fine some common sense on the issue.

I digress. His D.C decision is hopefully successful and addresses the right kinds of criminals. I can tell you when I was young the worst criminals all became cops, take that for what you will. I would recommend some outreach to prevent before someone takes the wrong path. Give kids hope with options.

If they can save some lives that's great, but I guarantee you the "he's a dictator and is trying to deflect from Epstein and wars around the world" is going to be the Dems response. Rightfully or wrongfully,, they are in politics mode 24/7.

A judge just ruled that the grand jury transcripts cannot be released. Pam Bondi now has to say there never was any list in the file material she got and say that if a list existed, the previous FBI or DOJ removed it and destroyed it so Democrats wouldn't be exposed.

As for DC, I would really like to know how they keep records and if they declassified a lot of crimes down to misdemeanors like they did in California. Not sure how many illegals are in DC but I know no record is kept of when someone is here illegally commits a crime as to whether the crime was committed by an illegal alien.

Newsom fought tooth and nail not to change the law they rammed through that anything stolen under $950.00 was a misdemeanor. That resulted in very few thefts even being reported, as well as those over $950.00 plea bargained down to under that so the jails wouldn't be overcrowded.