CRT-Woke Mob Tries To Claim Tulsa Massacre Was About Race

In other words, you don't feel guilty about slavery.....nothing to feel guilty about, right?


Me.......no......no one should feel guilty about slavery if they weren't a slave owner, and don't belong to the democrat party...the political party that owned the slaves and started the Civil War, killing about 500,000 Americans to keep slaves.....that stain should end the democrat party.
 
You don’t need to buy anything. It’s free to read online. If you’re gonna critique it then yes… you have to read it. Otherwise you do what you’re doing now… ignorantly talking out of your ass

We can tell you've never read it, and have to lie. No problem, it's all you deviants and commies have.
 
Me.......no......no one should feel guilty about slavery if they weren't a slave owner, and don't belong to the democrat party...the political party that owned the slaves and started the Civil War, killing about 500,000 Americans to keep slaves.....that stain should end the democrat party.

Bodacia, like all credulous muppets and parrots, feel guilty because they're racists themselves, but they want 'all those other white people' to pay for their own guilt, is all. Black people especially feel guilty about their own failures, and need to blame somebody else for their shitheaded 'culture' of dope and Pimp Daddy dreams.
 
There was no southern strategy.....

Perhaps it was the Nixon’s Southern Strategy. That does seem to be a more common explanation these days than the Dixiecrats. But Nixon’s Southern Strategy never actually happened. He did not campaign in the Deep South, but on the outskirts of the South. His strategy was the Sunbelt Strategy, which went from parts of Florida to California. Much of the south was outside where he actually campaigned.
On August 23, 2018, The Hill, published an opinion piece by Dinesh D’Souza, The myth of Nixon’s ‘Southern Strategy’ which stated:

In 1968, Nixon did not take a single state considered Deep South. Segregationist, George Wallace, took the Deep South. Hubert Humphry, the Democrats’ nominee, took Texas. This map shows just how well Nixon’s strategy worked and exactly who the Deep South voted for.
n21nnNbbsEGzZyFJ6s4HGzH3uqD6ixuozlZ6jLK0u85ROUKkP7wgkE9lusU_mjzfRe8YxaJZ2sYjWqwK9vhYO47Hm2u752GFPJobUev1zAmblQzy30Q=s0-d-e1-ft

Reagan is claimed to have used a continuation of Nixon’s Southern Strategy that never was. For Reagan, considering the states he won, it was more of an American strategy, beating Carter 489 electoral votes to 49.
Every claim Democrats make about the parties switching is not based on truth. Divisiveness and propaganda are the only things the Democrats have, and it continues to be very effective.



When did the Parties Switch on Civil Rights?

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/books/phillips-southern.pdf

A digital verson of the article...

So it is with Kevin Phillips, his defenders say, for contending that political success goes to the party that can cohesively hold together the largest num ber of ethnic prejudices, circumstance which at last favor the Republicans.
----
Though Phillips's ideas for an aggressive antiliberal cam paign strategy that would hasten the defection of work ing‐class Democrats to the Republican line did not prevail

Nixon's Southern strategy (Published 1970)
====


http://blackquillandink.com/?p=6082





********

If there was any 'southern strategy' by Nixon, is was in forcing the expansion of the Voting Rights Act to include CAlifornia and New York and the other northern states instead of just 5 or 6 of the southern states. Both New York and California still had their literacy tests; Harlem's black voter participation was nearly the same as Mississippi's, for example.


The formula for coverage under Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act​

As enacted in 1965, the first element in the formula was whether, on November 1, 1964, the state or a political subdivision of the state maintained a "test or device" restricting the opportunity to register and vote. The Act's definition of a "test or device" included such requirements as the applicant being able to pass a literacy test, establish that he or she had good moral character, or have another registered voter vouch for his or her qualifications.

The second element of the formula would be satisfied if the Director of the Census determined that less than 50 percent of persons of voting age were registered to vote on November 1, 1964, or that less than 50 percent of persons of voting age voted in the presidential election of November 1964. This resulted in the following states becoming, in their entirety, "covered jurisdictions": Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Virginia. In addition, certain political subdivisions (usually counties) in four other states (Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, and North Carolina) were covered. In fully covered states, the state itself and all political subdivisions of the state are subject to the special provisions. In "partially covered" states, the special provisions applied only to the identified counties. Voting changes adopted by or to be implemented in covered political subdivisions, including changes applicable to the state as a whole, are subject to review under Section 5.

In 1970, Congress recognized the continuing need for the special provisions of the Act, which were due to expire that year, and renewed them for another five years. It added a second prong to the coverage formula, identical to the original formula except that it referenced November 1968 as the relevant date for the maintenance of a test or device and the levels of voter registration and electoral participation. This addition to the formula resulted in the partial coverage of ten states, including Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, and Wyoming. Half of these states (Connecticut, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, and Wyoming) filed successful "bailout" lawsuits.
[/B]

Gee, New England sophisticates weren't fans of 'Diversity' after all, apparently. Yet we keep hearing all aobut those Evul Crackers here, from northern gimps and Caliornicator commies ...

In 1975, the Act's special provisions were extended for another seven years, and were broadened to address voting discrimination against members of "language minority groups," which were defined as persons who are American Indian, Asian American, Alaskan Natives or of Spanish heritage." As before, Congress expanded the coverage formula, based on the presence of tests or devices and levels of voter registration and participation as of November 1972. In addition, the 1965 definition of "test or device" was expanded to include the practice of providing any election information, including ballots, only in English in states or political subdivisions where members of a single language minority constituted more than five percent of the citizens of voting age. This third prong of the coverage formula had the effect of covering Alaska, Arizona, and Texas in their entirety, and parts of California, Florida, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, and South Dakota.

The Northern states were re-segregating as southern states were being dumped on; the Voting Rights Act would never have passed if it were to apply to the entire country instead of mostly southern states. Nixon had to order forced bussing in northern cities, and we got to saw all those sophisticated and educated Yankees throwing rocks and bricks at school busses on TV every night. lol lol lol and the gimps wonder why southerners gave the take over of the Democratic Party by northeastern liberal rich kids the finger. They're just stupid, is all. Obviously most of them have never even read the Acts nor know anything about them.
 
Last edited:
We can tell you've never read it, and have to lie. No problem, it's all you deviants and commies have.
“We”?! Who are you speaking for.

I did read it and found some very interesting parts. The one that stuck out was Abe Lincoln’s meeting with black leaders in the White House. They quoted the actual minutes taken from that meeting. Fascinating.

But you have no clue what I’m talking about do you
 
“We”?! Who are you speaking for.

I did read it and found some very interesting parts. The one that stuck out was Abe Lincoln’s meeting with black leaders in the White House. They quoted the actual minutes taken from that meeting. Fascinating.

But you have no clue what I’m talking about do you

lol Abe Lincoln was a white nationalist. You have no clue as to what he really thought; he and Stephen Douglas were pretty close in their views about blacks. You of course have no idea of what context is, nor the history of the previous 15 years, either; doesn't fit into the trite little sound bites you think is 'profound n stuff'. You're just a puppy puppet. Now sit up and beg for a milk bone.
 
lol Abe Lincoln was a white nationalist. You have no clue as to what he really thought; he and Stephen Douglas were pretty close in their views about blacks. You of course have no idea of what context is, nor the history of the previous 15 years, either; doesn't fit into the trite little sound bites you think is 'profound n stuff'. You're just a puppy puppet. Now sit up and beg for a milk bone.
The funny part of your post is you thinking you have a clue about anything that I may have or not have a clue about. You don’t know me. And you obviously haven’t read the 1619 project. Ignorant Idiot
 
I have my argument, they have theirs.....the democrat party put up those statues to honor the democrat party soldiers who fought to preserve slavery.....now, they are desperately trying to get rid of them in order to scrub that history.

No, the democrat party today is fighting to control everyone, not just blacks.....different tactics, same goal, more people they want to enslave.

No.....the democrats have not flipped, they have simply accepted racists of all skin colors into democrat party leadership.....for example....barak obama, a racist......who, along with the congressional black caucus honored racist and anti-semite louis farakhan with a dinner.....barak obama who sat in an openly racist and anti=semitic church for 20 years, calls the racist and anti-semitic pastor his good friend and allowed that racist and anti-semite to marry him and michelle and baptize their children, and barak obama who has had racist and anti-semite al sharpton to his White House over and over again, and to whom every democrat party candidate has to kneel to when they run for office

The democrat party is still the home of racists...they have just incorporated racists of all skin colors....
The Junglification of the Cities Is "Stonewall's Revenge"

For superior races, racism is part of the Survival Instinct. For inferior races, it is part of the Death Wish.
 
come to the Steeler Side.
This is my kind of "grooming"
images
"These Are the Times That Try Men's Souls"

I like winners, especially ones that keep coming back (8 Steeler appearances, 6 championships). Maybe America can do the same, winning a Civil War, a Race War, or a Populist Revolution against the Donkephant. As far as history is concerned, allowing another election is like canceling the championship because all the players went on strike (baseball, 1994).
 
Last edited:
Because of the Southern Strategy.
Ambidextrous Fallacy

They keep shaming the Democrats using the race-traitors' own doctrines. And bragging about Lincoln and all the Republicans who voted for the Civil Rights for the Uncivilized Acts in the 1960s.

Another example of this "Leftier Than Thou" gibberish is claiming that the production of alternative energies causes "pollution," as if industrial by-products are as evil as the Treehuggers preach about.

These weird and White-insulting takes must make Southerners feel uneasy.
 
Ambidextrous Fallacy

They keep shaming the Democrats using the race-traitors' own doctrines. And bragging about Lincoln and all the Republicans who voted for the Civil Rights for the Uncivilized Acts in the 1960s.

Another example of this "Leftier Than Thou" gibberish is claiming that the production of alternative energies causes "pollution," as if industrial by-products are as evil as the Treehuggers preach about.

These weird and White-insulting takes must make Southerners feel uneasy.
Not every southerner is a racist like you
 
Bodacia, like all credulous muppets and parrots, feel guilty because they're racists themselves, but they want 'all those other white people' to pay for their own guilt, is all. Black people especially feel guilty about their own failures, and need to blame somebody else for their shitheaded 'culture' of dope and Pimp Daddy dreams.
Politics Is a Spitball Fight at a Prep School

How do you feel about all these Leftier-Than-Thou Lincoln-loving memes being spewed by the fake Conservatives? Doesn't it prove that they care more about shaming Liberals than how excluded White people will take their Burn the South insults.
 
Not every southerner is a racist like you
Scalawags and HeirHeads

The hidden truth is that White Southerners were betrayed by Southern Preppies, just like during Vietnam, when the scummy gutless Southern richkids talked pro-war but had their Daddies get them out of having to fight in it.

There was nothing morally wrong with slavery, so Chickenhawkery was America's real Original Sin and has led to our decline and imminent fall.
 
Scalawags and HeirHeads

The hidden truth is that White Southerners were betrayed by Southern Preppies, just like during Vietnam, when the scummy gutless Southern richkids talked pro-war but had their Daddies get them out of having to fight in it.

There was nothing morally wrong with slavery, so Chickenhawkery was America's real Original Sin and has led to our decline and imminent fall.
Are you talking about Grifty's bone spurs?
 
Scalawags and HeirHeads

The hidden truth is that White Southerners were betrayed by Southern Preppies, just like during Vietnam, when the scummy gutless Southern richkids talked pro-war but had their Daddies get them out of having to fight in it.

There was nothing morally wrong with slavery, so Chickenhawkery was America's real Original Sin and has led to our decline and imminent fall.
Tell me Struth, what do you think about your fellow republicans take on slavery?
 

Forum List

Back
Top