Criminal prosecution for destruction of mail-in ballot envelopes?

[jwoodie]

Since the only way to verify the legitimacy of mail-in ballots is to check the signature and postmark dates of their envelopes, shouldn't election officials involved in destroying those envelopes be charged with deliberate destruction of criminal evidence? Or, after Hillary, is that no longer a crime?

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[Gdjjr]

I don't doubt the allegations- but, in court, they have to be proved beyond a doubt (allegedly)- in Pa a lower court judge has told the Pa legislature and gov their actions on the mail in votes were uncostitutional according to Pa constitution- in Ca a lower court judge told Newsom he didn't have the authority, under any circumstances, to change how voting can be carried out- those can be proven in court, where as circumstantial evidence like tampering with the voting machines will be almost impossible.

 

[Rambunctious]

If states certify these fraudulent counts they are committing a crime...but for some reason crimes against Trump and his supporters go unpunished and uninvestigated.....

 

[TheParser]

Since the only way to verify the legitimacy of mail-in ballots is to check the signature and postmark dates of their envelopes, shouldn't election officials involved in destroying those envelopes be charged with deliberate destruction of criminal evidence? Or, after Hillary, is that no longer a crime?

Nothing is a crime so long as it is against President Trump!

 

[jwoodie]

I don't doubt the allegations- but, in court, they have to be proved beyond a doubt (allegedly)- in Pa a lower court judge has told the Pa legislature and gov their actions on the mail in votes were uncostitutional according to Pa constitution- in Ca a lower court judge told Newsom he didn't have the authority, under any circumstances, to change how voting can be carried out- those can be proven in court, where as circumstantial evidence like tampering with the voting machines will be almost impossible.

So is there no way to do an accurate recount? Any system that doesn't allow for that is per se unconstitutional.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Yet another means they STOLE THE ELECTION. I'd forgotten about this.

 

[rightnow909]

that was really something... saw the whole thing, probably need to view again so as to get details. I'm not a tech person. Still, I understand the gist of it

totally in line with what Mollie Hemingway wrote in her book Rigged..

People who say there was no theft of the pres election are just dishonest as hell

 

[rightnow909]

Nothing is a crime so long as it is against President Trump!

Nothing is a crime so long as it is against We the People (who voted for President Trump)!