Crazed Biden Judge Signals She May Block Trump’s EO on Transgender Troops, Says the Assertion That Only Two Genders Exists is “Not Biologically Correc

Hollie

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
65,811
Reaction score
23,102
Points
2,250
And again we see the gender confusion that grips the leftist addled mind.

I will never understand the fear and superstition that grips the left on the issue of gender.




A federal judge on Tuesday signaled she would side with a group of transgender soldiers who sued to block President Trump’s executive order on transgender troops.

Judge Ana Reyes, a Biden appointee, grilled DOJ lawyers on Tuesday and said that Trump’s executive order asserting there are only two genders is “not biologically correct.”
 
asserting there are only two genders is “not biologically correct.”

R.d91889ae4cfc892326e6a4ccb13da462
 
And again we see the gender confusion that grips the leftist addled mind.

I will never understand the fear and superstition that grips the left on the issue of gender.




A federal judge on Tuesday signaled she would side with a group of transgender soldiers who sued to block President Trump’s executive order on transgender troops.

Judge Ana Reyes, a Biden appointee, grilled DOJ lawyers on Tuesday and said that Trump’s executive order asserting there are only two genders is “not biologically correct.”
Wow, a judge that's also a biologist....who knew.
 
And again we see the gender confusion that grips the leftist addled mind.

I will never understand the fear and superstition that grips the left on the issue of gender.




A federal judge on Tuesday signaled she would side with a group of transgender soldiers who sued to block President Trump’s executive order on transgender troops.

Judge Ana Reyes, a Biden appointee, grilled DOJ lawyers on Tuesday and said that Trump’s executive order asserting there are only two genders is “not biologically correct.”
Typical BS for the left. Yes, there are technically more than two genders. 99.9% of the world's population is either male or female and the remaining .1% are medical oddities.
 
And again we see the gender confusion that grips the leftist addled mind.

I will never understand the fear and superstition that grips the left on the issue of gender.




A federal judge on Tuesday signaled she would side with a group of transgender soldiers who sued to block President Trump’s executive order on transgender troops.

Judge Ana Reyes, a Biden appointee, grilled DOJ lawyers on Tuesday and said that Trump’s executive order asserting there are only two genders is “not biologically correct.”
.

She can't.


.
 
If Trump can sign an order helping people who cant naturally have babies have babies, there is nothing wrong with Biden having signed them helping people who don't have wieners get a wee wee.
 
.

Since when is "medical oddity" a gender?


.
You might argue with me but there have been those with two X's who don't have female body parts and those with an X and a Y who don't have male body parts. And, I think there have been some with both male and female body parts or no sex body parts at all.
 
You might argue with me but there have been those with two X's who don't have female body parts and those with an X and a Y who don't have male body parts. And, I think there have been some with both male and female body parts or no sex body parts at all.
.

Oh, I know they exist, poor souls. But they can't be called genders.


.
 
Her job is to interpret the law, not dictate the laws of biological science.
~~~~~~
Supposedly judges are supposed to rule strictly on the evidence and the written law, excluding public or personal opinion, ideology or activism.
(Excerpt):
" Judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult his own policy preferences (or those of whatever moral philosopher happens to be au courant at the time) when construing the Constitution or a statute, because those personal views are immaterial to what the law, fairly construed, actually provides. Judicial independence and judicial restraint thus work together hand-in-glove to channel judges’ attention to the factors that are actually relevant to the proper resolution of cases."

**********​
 
Last edited:
Eventually as we get poorer, these radical judges will be imprisoned, enslaved or killed. Men are suckers to die for this.
 
Ooooooohhh... a test case dealing with (two-gender) Reality... pretty...

Once that fruitcake rules it gets fast-walked up the judicial food chain...

The Last Stand of Bat$hit-Crazy Woke-A$$ed Judges...
 
And again we see the gender confusion that grips the leftist addled mind.

I will never understand the fear and superstition that grips the left on the issue of gender.




A federal judge on Tuesday signaled she would side with a group of transgender soldiers who sued to block President Trump’s executive order on transgender troops.

Judge Ana Reyes, a Biden appointee, grilled DOJ lawyers on Tuesday and said that Trump’s executive order asserting there are only two genders is “not biologically correct.”
But they’ve been telling us that biological sex and gender are two different things.

Are they ever going to make up their minds on this issue or can we expect them to just keep changing the narrative indefinitely?
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom