- Thread starter
- #801
USMB search: TNGTKRHey badger, do you know anything about the phizer and moderna vials with different lot numbers that contain the 1-3 HIV sequence?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
USMB search: TNGTKRHey badger, do you know anything about the phizer and moderna vials with different lot numbers that contain the 1-3 HIV sequence?
The N mutation at R203 compares with vlp’s (virus-like particles) linked to the SARS-CoV-2 spike mutation that Fau Chi got backwards in his video: D614G. Because that mutation precisely increases VSV pseudovirus particle production. VSV is the virus that ebola vaccine is based upon.Relative to the OP and recently out by Science.org: “The researchers are now trying to understand just how Delta’s R203M mutation and others in N improve the assembly of viral particles and their mRNA delivery to host cells. They will probe whether a host protein is involved. If so, targeting it with a drug could be an effective way to stall Delta’s spread.”
Science | AAAS
www.science.org
Is this your best guess at the Gain of Fucntion combination they used here?While Rand Paul hammers away at Fau Chi in the videos, we review the literature for two viruses 1.) RaTG13, SARS-CoV-2’s closest relative and 2.) RsSHC014. About 200 miles separates their discovery locations. As the ill Tongguan copper miners (location 1.)) were going into the Kunming hospital (location 2.)), Fau Chi published his testimony:
26 Ap 2012 Dual Use Research of Concern
Note the date of Nov 2011 in Fau Chi’s testimony. The virus at location 2.) was collected on 18 Ap 2011. That location is the south shore of Dian Lake, Kunming.
We have not yet excerpted what they did with the virus from location 2.), which was already a natural recombinant before Ralph Baric further experimented on it. Furthermore, there is a tryptophan (W) mutation of interest for the virus at location 2.), and we can see in their published report what they leave out of the discussion, which is noteworthy.Is this your best guess at the Gain of Fucntion combination they used here?
We can now link this mutation when comparing cats and dogs infected with SARS-CoV-2. This report for Delta R203M does not tell the reading prisoners about frameshifting, and that will also link to viruses we know that were deliberately manipulated in the lab such as RsSHC014 from the outskirts of Kunming. There is alreay a nasty Flower and Animal Market at Kunming, where buyers can see on display orchids ripped from trees in the jungle. But these virologists wanted to know something more about anthropogenic influencers of viral evolution. That is why we will compare RaTG13 from more remote locations, with RsSHC014 from urban locations.Relative to the OP and recently out by Science.org: “The researchers are now trying to understand just how Delta’s R203M mutation and others in N improve the assembly of viral particles and their mRNA delivery to host cells. They will probe whether a host protein is involved. If so, targeting it with a drug could be an effective way to stall Delta’s spread.”
Science | AAAS
www.science.org
That thought goes through my mind frequently but you’ve labeled it better, “reading prisoners” indeed. Regardless of great effort to use primary sources, are these sources free of bias? Are the information overlords becoming so skilled as to pay off fact checkers to give them a more neutral rating? Will public information, particularly health and scientific information, ever be free of big money influence considering certain studies are immediately ousted from consideration due to funding biases?We can now link this mutation when comparing cats and dogs infected with SARS-CoV-2. This report for Delta R203M does not tell the reading prisoners about frameshifting, and that will also link to viruses we know that were deliberately manipulated in the lab such as RsSHC014 from the outskirts of Kunming. There is alreay a nasty Flower and Animal Market at Kunming, where buyers can see on display orchids ripped from trees in the jungle. But these virologists wanted to know something more about anthropogenic influencers of viral evolution. That is why we will compare RaTG13 from more remote locations, with RsSHC014 from urban locations.
Every amino acid that falls on position 203 will be un-capitalized, in comparison with SARS-CoV-2 Delta R203M mutation:
SARS-CoV-2 N
PGSSrGTSPAR
SARS-CoV N
TPGSsRGNSPAR
RaTG13 (Tongguan copper mine, G8511 Expressway) N
TPGSSrGTSPAR
RsSHC014 (Kunming, G8511 Expressway, Kunming) N
PGSsRGNSPAR
Thusfar, R (arginine) and S (serine) dominate position 203 of the nucleoprotein. However, exemplary is an insane extremism of five sequential arginines found in the N sequence of a python nidovirus.
Fact checkers are only as good as the knowledge base being relied on. Therefore, fact checkers have to come this way: toward scientific facts, the facts should not bend towards them.That thought goes through my mind frequently but you’ve labeled it better, “reading prisoners” indeed. Regardless of great effort to use primary sources, are these sources free of bias? Are the information overlords becoming so skilled as to pay off fact checkers to give them a more neutral rating? Will public information, particularly health and scientific information, ever be free of big money influence considering certain studies are immediately ousted from consideration due to funding biases?
Science | AAAS
www.science.org
Does It Pay to Do Novel Science? The Selectivity Patterns in Science Funding
Abstract. Public funding agencies aim to fund novel breakthrough research to promote the radical scientific discoveries of tomorrow. Identifying the profilacademic.oup.com
This makes for an argument in favor of automated AI. Yet even then, the self-learning process for an AI can be absolutely contaminated with “boxes” of falsehoods, making any chance of pure learning quite the challenge if even possible.
Typically, I’m not so negative. This is more about seeing the reality of the dilemma. Beyond sifting through accepted papers funded by orgs with often specific agendas, any suggestions? I’ve scoured to find the “best” fact checker available, and the following seems to be as good as it gets, at least for right now.
Who is the Least Biased News Source? Simplifying the News Bias Chart
I examined 102 news sites on the news bias charttowardsdatascience.com