Court Rules Rupert Murdoch Can’t Hand Over Media Empire To His Right Wing Lunatic Son Lachlan

[skews13]

A Nevada commissioner ruled resoundingly against Mr. Murdoch, who was trying to give full control of his empire to his son Lachlan and lock in Fox News’s right-wing editorial slant. The commissioner, Edmund J. Gorman Jr., concluded in a decision filed on Saturday that the father and son, who is the head of Fox News and News Corp., had acted in “bad faith” in their effort to amend the irrevocable trust, which divides control of the company equally among Mr. Murdoch’s four oldest children — Lachlan, James, Elisabeth and Prudence — after his death.

The ruling was at times scathing. At one point in his 96-page opinion, Mr. Gorman characterizes the plan to change the trust as a “carefully crafted charade” to “permanently cement Lachlan Murdoch’s executive roles” inside the empire “regardless of the impacts such control would have over the companies or the beneficiaries” of the family trust.

BREAKING: Court rules Murdoch can't hand his empire to right wing son Lachlan

NY Times: Rupert Murdoch Fails in Bid to Change Family Trust A Nevada commissioner ruled resoundingly against Mr. Murdoch, who was trying to give full control of his empire to his son Lachlan and lock in Fox News’s right-wing editorial slant. The...

www.dailykos.com

 

[jbrownson0831]

A Nevada commissioner ruled resoundingly against Mr. Murdoch, who was trying to give full control of his empire to his son Lachlan and lock in Fox News’s right-wing editorial slant. The commissioner, Edmund J. Gorman Jr., concluded in a decision filed on Saturday that the father and son, who is the head of Fox News and News Corp., had acted in “bad faith” in their effort to amend the irrevocable trust, which divides control of the company equally among Mr. Murdoch’s four oldest children — Lachlan, James, Elisabeth and Prudence — after his death.

The ruling was at times scathing. At one point in his 96-page opinion, Mr. Gorman characterizes the plan to change the trust as a “carefully crafted charade” to “permanently cement Lachlan Murdoch’s executive roles” inside the empire “regardless of the impacts such control would have over the companies or the beneficiaries” of the family trust.

BREAKING: Court rules Murdoch can't hand his empire to right wing son Lachlan

NY Times: Rupert Murdoch Fails in Bid to Change Family Trust A Nevada commissioner ruled resoundingly against Mr. Murdoch, who was trying to give full control of his empire to his son Lachlan and lock in Fox News’s right-wing editorial slant. The...

www.dailykos.com

Sounds like another wacko judge decision that will get overturned. Dimtards try to write their own laws, Republicans enforce the ones already in existence skrewey.

 

[Oddball]

A "right wing lunatic" who put the neocon turd Paul Ryan on the NewsCorp board of directors?...Seriously?

Oh yeah, Daily Kooks....lmao

 

[EMH]

A "right wing lunatic" who put the neocon turd Paul Ryan on the NewsCorp board of directors?...Seriously?

Oh yeah, Daily Kooks....lmao

Spot on!!!


The entire Murdoch Klan was for Hillary and Traitor Joe. They are not at all conservative or patriotic to America. The "News network" still has not figured out we had a man as a "First Lady" for 8 years, because homO covered up 911, and the 911 crowd agreed to KEEP THE CLOSET DOOR SHUT in exchange...

 

[JimH52]

A Nevada commissioner ruled resoundingly against Mr. Murdoch, who was trying to give full control of his empire to his son Lachlan and lock in Fox News’s right-wing editorial slant. The commissioner, Edmund J. Gorman Jr., concluded in a decision filed on Saturday that the father and son, who is the head of Fox News and News Corp., had acted in “bad faith” in their effort to amend the irrevocable trust, which divides control of the company equally among Mr. Murdoch’s four oldest children — Lachlan, James, Elisabeth and Prudence — after his death.

The ruling was at times scathing. At one point in his 96-page opinion, Mr. Gorman characterizes the plan to change the trust as a “carefully crafted charade” to “permanently cement Lachlan Murdoch’s executive roles” inside the empire “regardless of the impacts such control would have over the companies or the beneficiaries” of the family trust.

BREAKING: Court rules Murdoch can't hand his empire to right wing son Lachlan

NY Times: Rupert Murdoch Fails in Bid to Change Family Trust A Nevada commissioner ruled resoundingly against Mr. Murdoch, who was trying to give full control of his empire to his son Lachlan and lock in Fox News’s right-wing editorial slant. The...

www.dailykos.com

I just read that. So the Aussie and his oldest acted in bad faith in trying to keep FOX news from reporting facts, instead of BS. Good!

 

[OKTexas]

A Nevada commissioner ruled resoundingly against Mr. Murdoch, who was trying to give full control of his empire to his son Lachlan and lock in Fox News’s right-wing editorial slant. The commissioner, Edmund J. Gorman Jr., concluded in a decision filed on Saturday that the father and son, who is the head of Fox News and News Corp., had acted in “bad faith” in their effort to amend the irrevocable trust, which divides control of the company equally among Mr. Murdoch’s four oldest children — Lachlan, James, Elisabeth and Prudence — after his death.

The ruling was at times scathing. At one point in his 96-page opinion, Mr. Gorman characterizes the plan to change the trust as a “carefully crafted charade” to “permanently cement Lachlan Murdoch’s executive roles” inside the empire “regardless of the impacts such control would have over the companies or the beneficiaries” of the family trust.

BREAKING: Court rules Murdoch can't hand his empire to right wing son Lachlan

NY Times: Rupert Murdoch Fails in Bid to Change Family Trust A Nevada commissioner ruled resoundingly against Mr. Murdoch, who was trying to give full control of his empire to his son Lachlan and lock in Fox News’s right-wing editorial slant. The...

www.dailykos.com

So who violated the law by giving the slimes a "sealed opinion"? And why are you putting this out when the district court hasn't made a final decision on the case?

.

 

[para bellum]

Libs are really scraping the bottom of the barrel, looking for any scrap of a story they can spin as "good news"...

Decision means exactly nothing, the trustees have to be in agreement when a change is made, so Rupert&son will make a better offer to the holdouts, whoever they are.

Or they will take it to a District Court and press the matter there, either way.

The ruling from the magistrate doesn't change anything regarding the way Fox is being run.

 

[JimH52]

Libs are really scraping the bottom of the barrel, looking for any scrap of a story they can spin as "good news"...

Decision means exactly nothing, the trustees have to be in agreement when a change is made, so Rupert&son will make a better offer to the holdouts, whoever they are.

Or they will take it to a District Court and press the matter there, either way.

The ruling from the magistrate doesn't change anything regarding the way Fox is being run.

Until the old fart dies.

 

[para bellum]

Until the old fart dies.

And he cuts the estranged siblings from his will and leaves his half to Lachlan, and the favored son holds 50% of the voting stock in the company, and nothing changes...

The other 3 siblings combined only control 29.7% of the voting stock.