Could Lawsuits Over Simple Ballot Mistakes Be the Difference in Key Swing States?

[berg80]

The ongoing Repub project is centered around the idea of wanting fewer people, not casting votes for Repubs, to be able to cast their votes at all. This, instead of persuading those voters to vote for them.


A key provision of the Civil Rights Act protects voters nationwide from being disenfranchised over innocent and minor accidental ballot mistakes. Republicans seem bothered by this reality, litigating against parties seeking to enforce the provision in a multitude of court cases throughout the country.

Dating back 60 years to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Materiality Provision states that “[n]o person acting under color of law shall…deny the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission…if such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified.”

In practice, the provision seeks to ensure that well-intended voters aren’t disenfranchised over small issues that are irrelevant to a voter’s eligibility. The most common areas of concern involve signatures, incorrect or missing dates, other omissions on mail-in ballots and ballots missing an outer return envelope.
https://www.democracydocket.com/ana...stakes-be-the-difference-in-key-swing-states/

 

[Manonthestreet]

If you half ass your ballot it's on you.

 

[1srelluc]

Now leftist dems think they are mind-readers and can determine intent from incomplete ballots.

Talk about having their cake and eating it too....They pushed for unfettered mail-in balloting and now want to dictate, after the fact, what is or isn't a valid ballot.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The ongoing Repub project is centered around the idea of wanting fewer people, not casting votes for Repubs, to be able to cast their votes at all. This, instead of persuading those voters to vote for them.


A key provision of the Civil Rights Act protects voters nationwide from being disenfranchised over innocent and minor accidental ballot mistakes. Republicans seem bothered by this reality, litigating against parties seeking to enforce the provision in a multitude of court cases throughout the country.

Dating back 60 years to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Materiality Provision states that “[n]o person acting under color of law shall…deny the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission…if such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified.”

In practice, the provision seeks to ensure that well-intended voters aren’t disenfranchised over small issues that are irrelevant to a voter’s eligibility. The most common areas of concern involve signatures, incorrect or missing dates, other omissions on mail-in ballots and ballots missing an outer return envelope.
https://www.democracydocket.com/ana...stakes-be-the-difference-in-key-swing-states/

We definitely need fewer dead voters. Fewer fraudulent voters.

 

[ColonelAngus]

OP means “Dems will commit fraud but claim it is simple ballot errors”.

 

[ColonelAngus]

We definitely need fewer dead voters. Fewer fraudulent voters.

Raskin and Swalwell straight up admitted they will pass legislation to remove Trump from the ballot.

Straight up witch hunt.

 

[martybegan]

We definitely need fewer dead voters. Fewer fraudulent voters.

Less ballot harvesting as well in general.

 

[Rawley]

The ongoing Repub project is centered around the idea of wanting fewer people, not casting votes for Repubs, to be able to cast their votes at all. This, instead of persuading those voters to vote for them.


A key provision of the Civil Rights Act protects voters nationwide from being disenfranchised over innocent and minor accidental ballot mistakes. Republicans seem bothered by this reality, litigating against parties seeking to enforce the provision in a multitude of court cases throughout the country.

Dating back 60 years to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Materiality Provision states that “[n]o person acting under color of law shall…deny the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission…if such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified.”

In practice, the provision seeks to ensure that well-intended voters aren’t disenfranchised over small issues that are irrelevant to a voter’s eligibility. The most common areas of concern involve signatures, incorrect or missing dates, other omissions on mail-in ballots and ballots missing an outer return envelope.
https://www.democracydocket.com/ana...stakes-be-the-difference-in-key-swing-states/

AKA voter fraud

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The ongoing Repub project is centered around the idea of wanting fewer people, not casting votes for Repubs, to be able to cast their votes at all. This, instead of persuading those voters to vote for them.


A key provision of the Civil Rights Act protects voters nationwide from being disenfranchised over innocent and minor accidental ballot mistakes. Republicans seem bothered by this reality, litigating against parties seeking to enforce the provision in a multitude of court cases throughout the country.

Dating back 60 years to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Materiality Provision states that “[n]o person acting under color of law shall…deny the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission…if such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified.”

In practice, the provision seeks to ensure that well-intended voters aren’t disenfranchised over small issues that are irrelevant to a voter’s eligibility. The most common areas of concern involve signatures, incorrect or missing dates, other omissions on mail-in ballots and ballots missing an outer return envelope.
https://www.democracydocket.com/ana...stakes-be-the-difference-in-key-swing-states/

I accidentally dropped 30 ballots into the box

Sureeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Raskin and Swalwell straight up admitted they will pass legislation to remove Trump from the ballot.

Straight up witch hunt.

Swalwell can't pass anything in the House, let alone the Senate.

 

[Independent thinker]

The ongoing Repub project is centered around the idea of wanting fewer people, not casting votes for Repubs, to be able to cast their votes at all. This, instead of persuading those voters to vote for them.


A key provision of the Civil Rights Act protects voters nationwide from being disenfranchised over innocent and minor accidental ballot mistakes. Republicans seem bothered by this reality, litigating against parties seeking to enforce the provision in a multitude of court cases throughout the country.

Dating back 60 years to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Materiality Provision states that “[n]o person acting under color of law shall…deny the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission…if such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified.”

In practice, the provision seeks to ensure that well-intended voters aren’t disenfranchised over small issues that are irrelevant to a voter’s eligibility. The most common areas of concern involve signatures, incorrect or missing dates, other omissions on mail-in ballots and ballots missing an outer return envelope.
https://www.democracydocket.com/ana...stakes-be-the-difference-in-key-swing-states/

LOL. So, you are already starting with your election denials?