Wrong.Its amazing how there will be 5 to 6 posts about cortez on google and yahoo daily.
The follow her every word even her make up procedure.
But they rarely talk about the real cortez .
The dreamer the socialist who has no clue about how to stimulate the economy. Only how to spend trillions .
Her health care plan and green energy plan would probally end up costing 50 to 60 trillion over 10 years.
Destroy manafacturing and the fossil fuel jobs open boarders to millions and destroy our nation.
If you think obama set records for putting people on welfare and food stamps give that pin headed ding bat a chance.
Of course maybe democrats think if she pushed hard enough to pop out her bug eyes and teeth she will pss solid gold turds.
The democrat party need to run from her and her kind .Run fast and far.
Nope Aponi she's the Trump of the liberal movement and media.
Even bad press is good press, and it competes for Trump's attention.
Michael Moore says Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez should be allowed to run for president | Daily Mail Online
Look at Michael Moore endorsing the value and impact of her image and office to run for President.
It's not about having effective plans, it's about
the PERSONALITY selling. That's how Trump did it,
and she's cashing in on this, too. Same game,
and it works to move the masses whether it makes sense or not.
Conservatives fear the positive, beneficial change and diversity she represents.
NOPE C_Clayton_Jones
They don't want all this bureaucracy loaded onto overgrown centralized
federal govt, nor Democrats teaching anyone that's the solution!
See also the thread I created for addressing this
approach of confusing "opposition to programs" with
opposition to "federal controls of social benefits":
CDZ - GOP please vote per deanrd: Do you oppose Education and Health care? or Federalization of them?
If you want CCJ, I prefer to settle this principle first ^
That way, we don't waste time or words arguing in circles
is it the Content that Conservatives oppose or the insistence on
relying on Federal Govt to implement the programs?
According the Poll I posted, it's more often the latter - opposition to federalization
because it takes democratic control of choices and resources away from people
and ties it up with politicized dominance that compromises the programs.
One poster already explained it was the QUALITY
of programs through federal govt that was substandard
to the same managed democratically and locally instead.
Can you answer and address that response C_Clayton_Jones?
Or is your only rebuttal "no they don't want those programs at all"
Can we have a real in-depth discussion of what works best?
Thanks appreciate your feedback and prefer we discuss
the actual content of programs and objections to how they are implemented
so this can be resolved instead of blamed on one side or another!