Coolest April On Record

[maineman]

I am not speaking for all tree huggers...I am trying to have a conversation with you.... you and me discussing weather and climate. Can you do that?

 

[red states rule]

It really is just a simple yes or no question, RSR.... why are you so afraid of just answering it?

Here: try again

I am not afraid

Global warming is here - it was a balmy 43 this morning

 

[maineman]

I am not afraid

Global warming is here - it was a balmy 43 this morning

yes...RSR...you ARE afraid. You are afraid of answering a simple yes or no question.

Try again:

Do you understand the difference between the concept of changing weather and the concept of changing climate?

Yes or No?

 

[red states rule]

yes...RSR...you ARE afraid. You are afraid of answering a simple yes or no question.

Try again:

Do you understand the difference between the concept of changing weather and the concept of changing climate?

Yes or No?

Here we go - tree hugger MM is trying to dance around the facts again

 

[maineman]

I have asked you to try and have a simple conversation with me. I have asked you a very simple question. It is clear to me that you do not wish to have a discussion with me and it is also clear that you are unable to answer the simple question.

Let me know if that changes.

 

[red states rule]

I have asked you to try and have a simple conversation with me. I have asked you a very simple question. It is clear to me that you do not wish to have a discussion with me and it is also clear that you are unable to answer the simple question.

Let me know if that changes.

Pardon me while I put on a sweater

This global warming is chilly this morning

 

[red states rule]

RSR do you understand the difference between the basic concepts of changing weather versus changing climate?

List of Global Warming Skeptics Grows, Media Couldn’t Care Less
Posted by Noel Sheppard on May 16, 2007 - 13:30.
While global warming alarmists like soon-to-be-Dr. Al Gore and his band of not so merry sycophants continue talking about a scientific consensus concerning man’s role in “climate change,” the list of scientists that have grown skeptical of this nexus continues to grow.

Unfortunately, a media obsessed with advancing hysteria on the subject refuse to acknowledge the existence of such folks as they continue to pound the table about the imminent doom to the planet.

With that in mind, Sen. James Inhofe’s office (R-Oklahoma) is preparing a “detailed and comprehensive sampling of scientists who have only recently spoken out against climate hysteria [that] will be forthcoming in a soon to be released U.S. Senate report.”

Inhofe’s communications director, Marc Morano, published a few of these names, as well as their backgrounds and conclusions, at Inhofe’s EPW Press Blog Tuesday:

Geophysicist Dr. Claude Allegre, a top geophysicist and French Socialist who has authored more than 100 scientific articles and written 11 books and received numerous scientific awards including the Goldschmidt Medal from the Geochemical Society of the United States, converted from climate alarmist to skeptic in 2006.
Geologist Bruno Wiskel of the University of Alberta recently reversed his view of man-made climate change and instead became a global warming skeptic.
Astrophysicist Dr. Nir Shaviv, one of Israel's top young award winning scientists, recanted his belief that manmade emissions were driving climate change.
Mathematician & engineer Dr. David Evans, who did carbon accounting for the Australian Government, recently detailed his conversion to a skeptic.
Climate researcher Dr. Tad Murty, former Senior Research Scientist for Fisheries and Oceans in Canada, also reversed himself from believer in man-made climate change to a skeptic.
Botanist Dr. David Bellamy, a famed UK environmental campaigner, former lecturer at Durham University and host of a popular UK TV series on wildlife, recently converted into a skeptic after reviewing the science and now calls global warming fears "poppycock."
Climate scientist Dr. Chris de Freitas of The University of Auckland, N.Z., also converted from a believer in man-made global warming to a skeptic.
Meteorologist Dr. Reid Bryson, the founding chairman of the Department of Meteorology at University of Wisconsin (now the Department of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, was pivotal in promoting the coming ice age scare of the 1970’s ( See Time Magazine’s 1974 article “Another Ice Age” citing Bryson: & see Newsweek’s 1975 article “The Cooling World” citing Bryson) has now converted into a leading global warming skeptic.
Global warming author and economist Hans H.J. Labohm started out as a man-made global warming believer but he later switched his view after conducting climate research.
Paleoclimatologist Tim Patterson, of Carlton University in Ottawa converted from believer in C02 driving the climate change to a skeptic.
Physicist Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski, chairman of the Central Laboratory for the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Radiological Protection in Warsaw, took a scientific journey from a believer of man-made climate change in the form of global cooling in the 1970’s all the way to converting to a skeptic of current predictions of catastrophic man-made global warming.
Paleoclimatologist Dr. Ian D. Clark, professor of the Department of Earth Sciences at University of Ottawa, reversed his views on man-made climate change after further examining the evidence.
Environmental geochemist Dr. Jan Veizer, professor emeritus of University of Ottawa, converted from believer to skeptic after conducting scientific studies of climate history.
Like many of you, I look forward to the full report being prepared by Sen. Inhofe’s office, and can’t way to see Charlie Gibson, Brian Williams, and Katie Couric begin their respective evening new broadcasts with these revelations.

Of course, I am not holding my breath.
http://newsbusters.org/node/12793

 

[maineman]

I have asked you to try and have a simple conversation with me. I have asked you a very simple question. It is clear to me that you do not wish to have a discussion with me and it is also clear that you are unable to answer the simple question.

Let me know if that changes.

why bother?

 

[red states rule]

why bother?

did you read the LONG list of scientists who no longer go along with the hysteria of global wamring?

I thought not

 

[maineman]

I just asked you a simple question....that's all.

you won't answer it.

 

[red states rule]

I just asked you a simple question....that's all.

you won't answer it.

Oh, I forgot about your phobia to facts

Please forgive me

 

[maineman]

Oh, I forgot about your phobia to facts

Please forgive me

how does my asking you a simple question equate to me having a phobia about facts? It seems clear to me that you have a phobia about answers.

 

[red states rule]

how does my asking you a simple question equate to me having a phobia about facts? It seems clear to me that you have a phobia about answers.

The myth of global warming is being exposed

The enviro wackos war on capitalism is falling apart

 

[maineman]

The myth of global warming is being exposed

The enviro wackos war on capitalism is falling apart

funny thing...I don't see my question answered there.

 

[red states rule]

funny thing...I don't see my question answered there.

You mean your lame attempt to duck the crumpling myth of global warming?

 

[maineman]

You mean your lame attempt to duck the crumpling myth of global warming?

no...my simple question.

do you understand the difference between the basic concepts of changing weather versus changing climate?

It is just an attempt to establish some framework for discussion.

Could you answer that simple question, please and not keep running away like a frightened girlieman? Please?

 

[red states rule]

no...my simple question.

do you understand the difference between the basic concepts of changing weather versus changing climate?

It is just an attempt to establish some framework for discussion.

Could you answer that simple question, please and not keep running away like a frightened girlieman? Please?

It is funny how the left keeps changing their code words

First it was global cooling - then global warming - now it is climate change

 

[maineman]

all your blustering bullshit does not obscure the fact that you have not and cannot answer a simple yes or no question.

run away...fly fly

 

[red states rule]

all your blustering bullshit does not obscure the fact that you have not and cannot answer a simple yes or no question.

run away...fly fly

So you deny the enviro wackos keep changing the name of the "crisis"?

 

[maineman]

So you deny the enviro wackos keep changing the name of the "crisis"?

let me say this one more fucking time:

until you start replying to questions asked of you, you really have no business asking more questions yourself. I ask a question...you answer it.... and then you ask a question, and I answer it.

Do you get the hang of how that all works now?

no more questions from you until you answer some of mine.