Fwiw, there are lots of posters here that have it all over any 'constitutional wits' i may possess.
Myself, i'm siding more with being obligated as a good citizen
They tell me freedom isn't free.....seems we should have some respect for that
How is that notion passed on?
~S~
I don't know a definitive answer, but I make sure that any child entrusted to my care knows a few things like the Pledge of Allegiance, a little about the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution. You can make history fun and applicable to a child's life.
Once a kid becomes a teen, they work a part time job and get their first dose of reality: a paycheck minus taxes. That's an opportune time to make sure they understand that, as a taxpayer, they are also an employer and they need to know what their employees are spending the money on.
The real problem is that 99 percent of most Americans would fail a civics test. So, it is the blind leading the blind. And just so you understand this, I have to give you an analogy:
In the 1990s I had the opportunity to work on a legal case wherein local sheriffs refused to enforce the Brady background bill. Their view was that they were elected by the people in their county and did not answer to the federal government. In the end, the United States government agreed with them. The federal government has no authority to commandeer state and local officials.
Today, if the federal government passed an unconstitutional gun law, the state and local LEOs could refuse to enforce the law. Our Right to resist tyrannical government has been upheld as the founders / framers intended.
Along come those obsessed with immigration demanding that state and local governments arrest undocumented foreigners. The organizations representing the undocumented foreigners invoke the precedent set in the Printz case wherein the state and local governments cannot be commandeered by the federal government. Those obsessed with immigration are too uneducated to understand that, Hell, I may empathize with them about immigration. The sheriff I worked with during the Printz case as it developed, Richard Mack is on their side. He regrets the decision as it is now used to remind people like Trump that he cannot commandeer state and local officials.
With states like Virginia threatening to enforce gun laws using the National Guard, the military or anyone else, I
do not regret the fact that the feds cannot intervene (constitutionally) to dismantle sanctuary cities because that same law is what allows the states to stand against unconstitutional laws like gun control.
With so many uneducated / misinformed people about how the system works and what you might have to give up on one issue to prevail on another means that if we made civics a required course, we'd be hard pressed to find objective and informed teachers to teach the subject. Don't this make you feel like a rodent on a treadmill?