Conservative alternatives to Facebook Twitter etc...

[Ray From Cleveland]

Conservative alternatives to Facebook Twitter etc...

Conservatives get their message out at the ballot box The left ran their big fat stupid mouths for months on social media then we crushed them like a bug in a landslide Trump victory. The left was like, what...

The left saw conservatives freely exchanging ideas on Twitter and Facebook as a major reason they lost. Hence they will censor that speech to control the elections.

Fascist book is a private concern, they have just as much right to censor American speech as a baker does to refuse baking gay wedding cakes.

BUT when a PLATFORM such as Android blocks programs that provide an alternative to the leftist platforms, then it is no different than if Verizon or AT&T censored what you said on your phone.

Blocking the dissemination of technology to provide a free speech platform absolutely violates the 1st Amendment and must be acted on.

I don't think they blocked anything, just didn't offer apps on their store. It's their right to do so. As I stated earlier, you can go to any site and download their apps for free.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I often asked why conservatives weren't creating their own social apps to avoid the left shutting them down on the main apps.

Now I know why.

First they ban you for hate speech on the usual platforms. Hate speech......

Then you create your own app and the powers that be BAN THE APPS from their devices.
Google explains why it banned the app for Gab, a right-wing Twitter rival

The left have a strangle hold on our free expression.

Maybe because the 21st Century Conservative is as welcome as a turd in a punch bowl? But I digress, you have the ability to post here, that most of us don't take you seriously is not our fault.

The Internet is replete with websites and blogs for 21st Century conservatives; what is missing is the conservatism of the late 20th Century, wherein thoughtful expression and substantive discussions were welcome. A time when Science was respected, change acceptable, and new and fresh ideas evaluated.

The United States Constitution is what you and your fellow Marxists hate. Google and Apple with their Android and iDolt platforms are the modern equivalent of Ma Bell. While AT&T was a horrible monopoly, they at least never tried to censor CONTENT. That is exactly what Google is doing, using their position as a public utility to censor ideas they disagree with.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I often asked why conservatives weren't creating their own social apps to avoid the left shutting them down on the main apps.

Now I know why.

First they ban you for hate speech on the usual platforms. Hate speech......

Then you create your own app and the powers that be BAN THE APPS from their devices.
Google explains why it banned the app for Gab, a right-wing Twitter rival

The left have a strangle hold on our free expression.

Do us all a favor and learn what free speech is and who it is applied towards.

Gab is growing despite Google banning it. If you do not like Google, make you own search engine.

I never mentioned anyones free speech rights leftard.

LEARN TO READ

Free expression = free speech.

Get a life you statist, the government is not going to jump in and save you

So retard, it would be good with you if Logitech built all keyboards to automatically erase anything that was pro-socialist?

Or better yet Comrade, would you support gas stations refusing to sell gas to anyone with a Hillary sticker on their car?

Fucking hypocrite commie bastard.

Having a bad day Sparky.

Again Commie fuck, should phone companies have the right to regulate what you say on your phone?

Yes or no Comrade?

 

[JakeStarkey]

I often asked why conservatives weren't creating their own social apps to avoid the left shutting them down on the main apps.

Now I know why.

First they ban you for hate speech on the usual platforms. Hate speech......

Then you create your own app and the powers that be BAN THE APPS from their devices.
Google explains why it banned the app for Gab, a right-wing Twitter rival

The left have a strangle hold on our free expression.

Tell the truth.

 

[Synthaholic]

Best Conservative Alternative To Facebook
Make real friends, spend real time with them, and stop letting the internet influence you with garbage.

Brought to you by Applebees!

 

[dblack]

Again Commie fuck, should phone companies have the right to regulate what you say on your phone?

Yes or no Comrade?

Sure, why not? As long as they're up front about the deal. As long as the users consent to the arrangement. I can't imagine many would. I certainly wouldn't. That kind of shit is why Facebook's usage is plummeting.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I often asked why conservatives weren't creating their own social apps to avoid the left shutting them down on the main apps.

Now I know why.

First they ban you for hate speech on the usual platforms. Hate speech......

Then you create your own app and the powers that be BAN THE APPS from their devices.
Google explains why it banned the app for Gab, a right-wing Twitter rival

The left have a strangle hold on our free expression.

Do us all a favor and learn what free speech is and who it is applied towards.

Gab is growing despite Google banning it. If you do not like Google, make you own search engine.

Comrade, Google banned the app on all Android and Chrome Devices.

I thought you Communists demanded "public access."

Oh, but only when it serves the far left agenda.

Google is a private company, they can ban what they hell ever they want. But you statist want the govemretn to swoop down and save you from the mean old company.

You damn statist are just sickening.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

So retard, it would be good with you if Logitech built all keyboards to automatically erase anything that was pro-socialist?

Or better yet Comrade, would you support gas stations refusing to sell gas to anyone with a Hillary sticker on their car?

Fucking hypocrite commie bastard.

Yes to both, I would support either company's right to do such a thing. Then I could make the choice if I wanted to support them with my money.

That is the difference between you and I, you want the government to fix all your problem and make people be nice to you, I say let the marketplace work it out.

That is why you are a statist and I am a libertarian.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes to both, I would support either company's right to do such a thing. Then I could make the choice if I wanted to support them with my money.

That is the difference between you and I, you want the government to fix all your problem and make people be nice to you, I say let the marketplace work it out.

Yet that's what we do with football and you on the left are crying the blues.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes to both, I would support either company's right to do such a thing. Then I could make the choice if I wanted to support them with my money.

That is the difference between you and I, you want the government to fix all your problem and make people be nice to you, I say let the marketplace work it out.

Yet that's what we do with football and you on the left are crying the blues.

Once again someone to the left of me calling me “on the left”...strange indeed.

You statist are the ones cheering when the government in the form of official statements from the president get involved with the NFL and its players. I am the one arguing against the government taking a position.

Once again, the difference between you the statist and me the libertarian.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[iceberg]

Yes to both, I would support either company's right to do such a thing. Then I could make the choice if I wanted to support them with my money.

That is the difference between you and I, you want the government to fix all your problem and make people be nice to you, I say let the marketplace work it out.

Yet that's what we do with football and you on the left are crying the blues.

Once again someone to the left of me calling me “on the left”...strange indeed.

You statist are the ones cheering when the government in the form of official statements from the president get involved with the NFL and its players. I am the one arguing against the government taking a position.

Once again, the difference between you the statist and me the libertarian.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

what's really strange is your faux rage at being called "on the left" cause hey - it doesn't fit. but you'll slap STATIST on anyone who disagrees with you and hammer that fucking square peg into a triangle hole.

you really are exactly who you bitch at a lot.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes to both, I would support either company's right to do such a thing. Then I could make the choice if I wanted to support them with my money.

That is the difference between you and I, you want the government to fix all your problem and make people be nice to you, I say let the marketplace work it out.

Yet that's what we do with football and you on the left are crying the blues.

Once again someone to the left of me calling me “on the left”...strange indeed.

You statist are the ones cheering when the government in the form of official statements from the president get involved with the NFL and its players. I am the one arguing against the government taking a position.

Once again, the difference between you the statist and me the libertarian.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

what's really strange is your faux rage at being called "on the left" cause hey - it doesn't fit. but you'll slap STATIST on anyone who disagrees with you and hammer that fucking square peg into a triangle hole.

you really are exactly who you bitch at a lot.

Actually it does fit, a statist is one whom wants the government involved in social and economic affairs.




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes to both, I would support either company's right to do such a thing. Then I could make the choice if I wanted to support them with my money.

That is the difference between you and I, you want the government to fix all your problem and make people be nice to you, I say let the marketplace work it out.

Yet that's what we do with football and you on the left are crying the blues.

Once again someone to the left of me calling me “on the left”...strange indeed.

You statist are the ones cheering when the government in the form of official statements from the president get involved with the NFL and its players. I am the one arguing against the government taking a position.

Once again, the difference between you the statist and me the libertarian.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

The government never took a position on the players, Trump merely expressed an opinion which is his right as any other citizen.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes to both, I would support either company's right to do such a thing. Then I could make the choice if I wanted to support them with my money.

That is the difference between you and I, you want the government to fix all your problem and make people be nice to you, I say let the marketplace work it out.

Yet that's what we do with football and you on the left are crying the blues.

Once again someone to the left of me calling me “on the left”...strange indeed.

You statist are the ones cheering when the government in the form of official statements from the president get involved with the NFL and its players. I am the one arguing against the government taking a position.

Once again, the difference between you the statist and me the libertarian.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

The government never took a position on the players, Trump merely expressed an opinion which is his right as any other citizen.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

According to both the Press Sec and the DOJ, tweets from the president are official statements, thus the government has taken a position.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Faun]

I often asked why conservatives weren't creating their own social apps to avoid the left shutting them down on the main apps.

Now I know why.

First they ban you for hate speech on the usual platforms. Hate speech......

Then you create your own app and the powers that be BAN THE APPS from their devices.
Google explains why it banned the app for Gab, a right-wing Twitter rival

The left have a strangle hold on our free expression.

Do us all a favor and learn what free speech is and who it is applied towards.

Gab is growing despite Google banning it. If you do not like Google, make you own search engine.

Comrade, Google banned the app on all Android and Chrome Devices.

I thought you Communists demanded "public access."

Oh, but only when it serves the far left agenda.

We never demanded public access be exploited for the purpose of spreading hate speech by neonazis.

 

[iceberg]

I often asked why conservatives weren't creating their own social apps to avoid the left shutting them down on the main apps.

Now I know why.

First they ban you for hate speech on the usual platforms. Hate speech......

Then you create your own app and the powers that be BAN THE APPS from their devices.
Google explains why it banned the app for Gab, a right-wing Twitter rival

The left have a strangle hold on our free expression.

Do us all a favor and learn what free speech is and who it is applied towards.

Gab is growing despite Google banning it. If you do not like Google, make you own search engine.

Comrade, Google banned the app on all Android and Chrome Devices.

I thought you Communists demanded "public access."

Oh, but only when it serves the far left agenda.

We never demanded public access be exploited for the purpose of spreading hate speech by neonazis.

good thing no one was doing that then, huh? well not on the real world anyway.

 

[Faun]

I often asked why conservatives weren't creating their own social apps to avoid the left shutting them down on the main apps.

Now I know why.

First they ban you for hate speech on the usual platforms. Hate speech......

Then you create your own app and the powers that be BAN THE APPS from their devices.
Google explains why it banned the app for Gab, a right-wing Twitter rival

The left have a strangle hold on our free expression.

Do us all a favor and learn what free speech is and who it is applied towards.

Gab is growing despite Google banning it. If you do not like Google, make you own search engine.

Comrade, Google banned the app on all Android and Chrome Devices.

I thought you Communists demanded "public access."

Oh, but only when it serves the far left agenda.

We never demanded public access be exploited for the purpose of spreading hate speech by neonazis.

good thing no one was doing that then, huh? well not on the real world anyway.

Well they can’t do that with Google now. In the real world.

 

[iceberg]

Yes to both, I would support either company's right to do such a thing. Then I could make the choice if I wanted to support them with my money.

That is the difference between you and I, you want the government to fix all your problem and make people be nice to you, I say let the marketplace work it out.

Yet that's what we do with football and you on the left are crying the blues.

Once again someone to the left of me calling me “on the left”...strange indeed.

You statist are the ones cheering when the government in the form of official statements from the president get involved with the NFL and its players. I am the one arguing against the government taking a position.

Once again, the difference between you the statist and me the libertarian.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

what's really strange is your faux rage at being called "on the left" cause hey - it doesn't fit. but you'll slap STATIST on anyone who disagrees with you and hammer that fucking square peg into a triangle hole.

you really are exactly who you bitch at a lot.

Actually it does fit, a statist is one whom wants the government involved in social and economic affairs.

Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

then that would be everyone cause they're involved in our daily lives with drivers licenses, speed limits, marriage licenses, determining where we pee and with who... at one point or another that would be any of us now wouldn't it?

 

[OldLady]

Of course, the difference here is that social media is not banning conservative voices

Wrong

The difference here is the FCC didn't ban voices from the left they failed on their own.
The left is banning and censuring the right.

The left couldn't control the FCC so they did the next best thing and created social media which bypasses the FCC and reaches a wider audience all while maintaining control of who has access to their platform.

A smart move no doubt but the right needs to find a way to circumvent that monopoly

You realize the only thing getting banned is hate speech and hate groups, right? And that by equating them with the Right's free speech, you are making it sound as if the Right is supporting hate groups. Way to go, Grampa...

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Of course, the difference here is that social media is not banning conservative voices

Wrong

The difference here is the FCC didn't ban voices from the left they failed on their own.
The left is banning and censuring the right.

The left couldn't control the FCC so they did the next best thing and created social media which bypasses the FCC and reaches a wider audience all while maintaining control of who has access to their platform.

A smart move no doubt but the right needs to find a way to circumvent that monopoly

You realize the only thing getting banned is hate speech and hate groups, right? And that by equating them with the Right's free speech, you are making it sound as if the Right is supporting hate groups. Way to go, Grampa...

Take your meds