Comrade DeBlasio Removed N. Y. “Stop and Frisk” Policy – Last Night At Least 13 shot

[Vigilante]

Thread title is rich rich with irony.

Stop and frisk is somthing the "comrades" would want dumb dumb.

Yes, inconvenience for a minute or two, to prevent another shooting, isn't worthwhile. A simple patdown by police, nothing found, a brief report made and on your way. So fucking intrusive of your supposed Civil Rights!

 

[Vigilante]

Way to answer the question dickhead wannabe bad ass. This is America not some dictatorship where people can't walk down a god damn street without being harassed by pigs.

Our local OWS pond scum rings in! You were the one that shit on the cop car, weren't you? Bet this human debris has been arrested, more than once, and now has an axe to grind, with NOTHING to do with citizen safety!

Cops are the enemy. End of the story. They are the biggest gang in America. You are a wannabe bad ass arm chair warrior who thinks people are scared of you...I already offered my name and address since yer a rambo bad ass...

Yes, we see you're a bad ass with a criminal record, Please post your name and address , I'm sure we can get someone to investigate you! ...

 

[G.T.]

Yea sorry comrades favor stop and frisk, not patriots. Fear doesnt drive the patriot's demand for freedom, that trait belongs to the comrades comrade.

 

[idb]

Chicago has the strictest gun laws of any city, followed by NYC, and just LOOK what those stats are. The answer is CC of a weapon by people without an arrest record, and follow up background checks.

You're saying that not allowing cops to randomly stop people and check them for weapons is resulting in more shootings.
You never mentioned CC laws or background checks in your OP.
Have the CC laws and background checks changed in NY as well?

It's almost impossible to get a CC in NYC... use a search engine!

So, the only thing that's changed is the Stop & Frisk policy.
Why did you even bother to mention CC at all?

Your rant is typically mindless.

I'll explain your disjointed logic if I can.
You're advocating that cops be allowed to stop anyone to search for weapons.
That is gun control.
You're saying that the loss of this power by the cops is resulting in more shootings.
Ergo - less gun control equals more shootings.

On the other hand - no Stop & Frisk presumably means more guns being carried around.
But, how could that be, there are more shootings....when there are more guns?!
That goes against everything the good folk at the NRA are telling me.

 

[KNB]

Vagilante, please go fuck yourself. You know less than shit about absolutely nothing and your willing ignorance is an insult to human intellect.

Yet again, you fucking moron, the character in your picture was not in favor of random searches and seizures by police, just like the US Constitution is not in favor of random searches and seizures.

Have you ever read the US Constitution, or is that like V For Vendetta? You already know what it says so you don't have to read it, right?

Fucking moron.

 

[Vigilante]

Yea sorry comrades favor stop and frisk, not patriots. Fear doesnt drive the patriot's demand for freedom, that trait belongs to the comrades comrade.

I would have tended to agree with you, but the actual statisics of the effectiveness of S&F disagree with you. I also see you care little for minorities who are usually the targets of these criminals... Slightly racist!

 

[KNB]

Minorities are the targets of stop and frisk, fucking moron.

 

[G.T.]

Vigilante, you showed your ass here dude.

Youre either REALLY stupid, and dont realize the blatant contradiction -or- your hypocrisy is reconciled by your bigotry and your inherent fear of your own shadow.

 

[Vigilante]

You're saying that not allowing cops to randomly stop people and check them for weapons is resulting in more shootings.
You never mentioned CC laws or background checks in your OP.
Have the CC laws and background checks changed in NY as well?

It's almost impossible to get a CC in NYC... use a search engine!

So, the only thing that's changed is the Stop & Frisk policy.
Why did you even bother to mention CC at all?

Your rant is typically mindless.

I'll explain your disjointed logic if I can.
You're advocating that cops be allowed to stop anyone to search for weapons.
That is gun control.
You're saying that the loss of this power by the cops is resulting in more shootings.
Ergo - less gun control equals more shootings.

On the other hand - no Stop & Frisk presumably means more guns being carried around.
But, how could that be, there are more shootings....when there are more guns?!
That goes against everything the good folk at the NRA are telling me.

The cops have prosecutorial discretion based upon their personal history, and years of policing. Just as they can stop someone driving a car, to ascertain if they are drunk and disobeying the law, and a threat to the populace. So in other words. because the police do make arrests of drunk drivers simply by observation. we now must ban all cars.

Because there are more shooting has absolutely nothing to do with more guns, it has everything to do with finding guns already on the street.

 

[KNB]

This "vigilante" hates subversives, which by itself is monumentally braindead, but then he wants the big government to stop and search anyone at whim.

You know the old saying, "People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their People."

 

[Vigilante]

Minorities are the targets of stop and frisk, fucking moron.

So are the shootings, you racist ****, to quote you!

 

[Jughead]

For those of you who weren't around before "Stop & Frisk" was initiated...New York City used to be almost as dangerous as Chicago is now.

The city will be quickly heading back in that direction because the gang bangers will all be packing again. Common sense is seldom in abundance when progressives make policy. It's amazing to me how many of this board's liberals continually rant about getting guns off the street...yet back DeBlasio on this. I take it that you don't have a problem with guns being carried by gang members...but have a HUGE problem with them being carried by law abiding citizens?

Hopefully the police commissioner or other law enforcement officials will be able to talk some sense into DeBlasio to re-instate the policy.

 

[Vigilante]

Vigilante, you showed your ass here dude.

Youre either REALLY stupid, and dont realize the blatant contradiction -or- your hypocrisy is reconciled by your bigotry and your inherent fear of your own shadow.

Yes, I'm sure you and your racist friends will approve of more minorities being shot, instead of protected, and rather easily.... please continue, you're amusing!

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Well, so much for trying to prevent the poor and minority crowd in NYC from being killed and maimed with STOP & FRISK.... the idiots get what they wanted! Proving once again that COMMON SENSE when left in the hands of subversive, and Democratic politicians, do way more harm than good!

Comrade DeBlasio Inc. Removed New York ?Stop and Frisk? Policy ? Last Night At Least 13 Shot In 5 Boroughs | The Last Refuge

Just another example of democrat's War on Black people. Can't enslave them; have to euthanize them.

 

[KNB]

Vag, what you're doing is called "trolling". You know that stop and frisk was a racist venture and that's why it was stopped. You inflate your concern of minorities to a point of ridiculousness. Everyone knows that you don't care about poor black people in American slums. You want the police to be able to stop and search them whenever, for whatever reason, which means that you aren't a vigilante and you don't want the government to be afraid of the People.

You are a troll, and a troll is a fucking moron.

 

[G.T.]

Lolol at that avatar quote vs this thread


Im in stitches

 

[Vigilante]

Lolol at that avatar quote vs this thread


Im in stitches

But NOTHING about protecting the poor minorities.... your true colors are showing, racist!

BTW, where are all the supposed liberal minority lovers that should be agreeing with me on this? Protecting the poor and minorities should be worthwhile compared to a SLIGHT INCONVENIENCE of stopping a suspicious person, as the police do with car drivers!

 

[whitehall]

I'll grant you that the "Miranda rights" creation by the left wing is the biggest scam in law-enforcement in the 20th century but the 4th Amendment right of people to be secure in their homes and persons is absolute. If you bend it to make it more convenient for Police to do their jobs you undermine the Constitution.

 

[KNB]

Yet those "suspicious people" that you want the big government police to stop and frisk are the same minorities that you claim to care so much about.

The big government police are just keeping the minorities safe from themselves, right? It's called POLICING, right?

Fucking moron.

 

[Vigilante]

I'll grant you that the "Miranda rights" creation by the left wing is the biggest scam in law-enforcement in the 20th century but the 4th Amendment right of people to be secure in their homes and persons is absolute. If you bend it to make it more convenient for Police to do their jobs you undermine the Constitution.

You do realize that S&F is a convenient way of determining if a suspect does have a gum. The police DO HAVE THE RIGHT to stop you IF THEY BELIEVE you may have a weapon on your person that could be a DANGER TO THE OFFICER, again, it's semantics, but any officer can stop you IF HE BELIEVES his life may be in jeopardy! I believe SCOTUS has upheld that right of an officer, (No one that I know of can READ what that officer supposedly THINKS about a situation) if not, please post a link in disagreement, and I will withdraw!