'Complete Bats**t Insanity': Critics Torch Trump Over Bonkers Medical Rant

Wow you mean one of the blob’s agencies is backing up the other agency run by the blob? Shocking!
 
Now I have that song in my head.
tenor.gif
 
‘Trump on Sunday fired off an all-caps warning urging women not to take Tylenol while pregnant or give it to their kids while also scaremongering about common childhood vaccines.

Trump did a copy-and-paste job of his own September post railing against Tylenol as well as the MMR, chickenpox and hepatitis B vaccines (which he misspelled as “HEPATITAS”), then added a link to a new report in the conservative Daily Caller that claimed the FDA ignored warnings about the use of the painkiller during pregnancy.

Trump last month held a press conference where he pushed unproven claims linking Tylenol and certain vaccines to autism. Medical experts at the time slammed the advice, saying it’s not backed by evidence. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, for example, called Trump’s guidance “irresponsible” and “unsettling.”

Most experts urged pregnant women to follow the advice of their own doctors rather than anything the president said. Trump at the time suggested the experts have conflicts, while also admitting they could be correct.’


And again, we have to ask: is Trump truly this insane, reckless, and irresponsible or is he spreading disinformation and lies to disrupt the political process, deflect from Epstein, and deflect from his many faults and failures.

Or is it likely both.

Regardless, this is further proof that Trump is unfit to be president.
Tylenol itself has warned pregnant women to not take it.

But as soon as Orange Man says it, you lose your minds over it. Leftards are now running out to buy Tylenol and gulp them down.
 
Tylenol itself has warned pregnant women to not take it.

But as soon as Orange Man says it, you lose your minds over it. Leftards are now running out to buy Tylenol and gulp them down.
Tylenol advises women to consult their doctor.
That's because virtually every drug has some side effects. But acetaminophen has far fewer dangers than aspirin or other common analgesics.
 
This thread is yet another example of how lefties will always come in to defend giant pharmaceutical companies.


They will defend the 82 vaccines for kids.

They will defend the mRNA clot shots proven to be dangerous.

Their beloved scientists still have no theory on the cause of autism, but they will shout down any accusation against Big Pharma.

Anyone want to take a guess why lefties are like this? Why they do this?
 
Tylenol advises women to consult their doctor.
That's because virtually every drug has some side effects. But acetaminophen has far fewer dangers than aspirin or other common analgesics.
Of course, consult your drug dealer…I mean doctor.
 
Do ya? Do you also like shitting on the floor to get a rise out of people?
~~~~~~>
That seems to be what Democrats do all the time. Have you been to LA or San Francisco lately? Between the human waste and discarded needles on the streets it's a wonder anyone is able to walk unimpeded without stepping in it...
 
This thread is yet another example of how lefties will always come in to defend giant pharmaceutical companies.


They will defend the 82 vaccines for kids.

They will defend the mRNA clot shots proven to be dangerous.

Their beloved scientists still have no theory on the cause of autism, but they will shout down any accusation against Big Pharma.

Anyone want to take a guess why lefties are like this? Why they do this?
~~~~~~>
Seems Democrats would rather have autistic and transgender children than young mentally healthy and well adjusted children.
 
Google is your friend and I'm not playing the ignorant game
Democrats maliciously gaslight Americans. They know exactly what you are talking about.

An American voting for democrats is like a chicken voting for KFC.

Democrats have nothing but the worst intentions for Americans
 
15th post
~~~~~~>
Seems that Derangement Syndrome of Democrats appears each time a Republican president is elected...
The appearance of Democrat Derangement can be traced back to it's beginnings to Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Nixon, Reagan, Bush '43' and now Trump.
In every era of extreme presidential hatred, the issue was not merely the personality of the leader—but the fear that this leader represented one half of the nation rising to dominate and extinguish the other. The conflict existed independently of the individual; the person simply became the public symbol around which the dispute crystallized. If Jefferson and Adams had not been the figures of their time, someone else would have emerged to embody each side. The structural conflict—over federal power, economic organization, social order, or national identity—would have persisted regardless.
Trump Derangement Syndrome is not about Trump himself. It is about a nation split between incompatible visions of its identity, governance, and place in the world. Historical examples—from Jefferson and Jackson to Lincoln, FDR, and Nixon—show that when such fundamental divisions exist, intense personal and political hatred inevitably emerges. Individuals become symbols, not creators, of these conflicts.
What appears to be unprecedented today is largely a product of technology and media. The structural tension—the real cause of TDS—has been a constant in American political life. Recognizing this helps us see TDS not as a new pathology, but as the latest expression of a recurring, deeply American phenomenon: the clash between competing visions of what the nation should be.
 
~~~~~~>
Seems that Derangement Syndrome of Democrats appears each time a Republican president is elected...
The appearance of Democrat Derangement can be traced back to it's beginnings to Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Nixon, Reagan, Bush '43' and now Trump.
In every era of extreme presidential hatred, the issue was not merely the personality of the leader—but the fear that this leader represented one half of the nation rising to dominate and extinguish the other. The conflict existed independently of the individual; the person simply became the public symbol around which the dispute crystallized. If Jefferson and Adams had not been the figures of their time, someone else would have emerged to embody each side. The structural conflict—over federal power, economic organization, social order, or national identity—would have persisted regardless.
Trump Derangement Syndrome is not about Trump himself. It is about a nation split between incompatible visions of its identity, governance, and place in the world. Historical examples—from Jefferson and Jackson to Lincoln, FDR, and Nixon—show that when such fundamental divisions exist, intense personal and political hatred inevitably emerges. Individuals become symbols, not creators, of these conflicts.
What appears to be unprecedented today is largely a product of technology and media. The structural tension—the real cause of TDS—has been a constant in American political life. Recognizing this helps us see TDS not as a new pathology, but as the latest expression of a recurring, deeply American phenomenon: the clash between competing visions of what the nation should be.
That sure is a lot of pompous bloviating, just to justify grade school poo flinging.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom