Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
most people like me will vote against him b/c he's trash and i can do better
How is he trash? And can do better? With whom?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
most people like me will vote against him b/c he's trash and i can do better
What do you mean by 'where they were wrong'?
Happened in California and Mississippi Los Angeles riots of 1992 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia right or wrong theres a major difference in peaceful demostration and flat out acting like animals....
People will vote against him because he is half black and that his full name is Barack Hussein Obama.
If you don't want to admit that, your ignorance is astounding.
When they rioted, when it was wrong for them to riot. There is rioting for justice and for freedom. Then there is justice for the sake of rioting, causing chaos, and for no reason.
Im not voting for him because he's flat out unqualified for the job, PLUS all the other things you mentioned...I would never betray the heritage of my ancestry nor the forefathers of this country USA, absolutly not...
People will vote against him because he is half black and that his full name is Barack Hussein Obama.
That's a judgement call. Rioting usually doesn't solve the problem. Ghandi proved that. The riots that happened after the Rodney King verdict were clearly wrong, yet they still rioted.
There will be a significant percentage of white Democrats who will say that they will vote for Obama, yet will not because he is black.
The forefathers of this country who wiped out the Indians, denied women the right to vote, owned slaves, denied non-landowners the right to vote, and of course only rebelled when THEY were getting heavily taxed.
Yeah, those guys you are so very proud of.![]()
The forefathers of this country who wiped out the Indians, denied women the right to vote, owned slaves, denied non-landowners the right to vote, and of course only rebelled when THEY were getting heavily taxed.
Yeah, those guys you are so very proud of.![]()
There will be a significant percentage of white Democrats who will say that they will vote for Obama, yet will not because he is black.
This is an interesting post. Obviously you have contempt for the men who formed this country. What needs to happen before you will be proud of America?
This is an interesting post. Obviously you have contempt for the men who formed this country. What needs to happen before you will be proud of America?
I dont give a flying rats ass what your version of it is you socialist history rewriter. Opinions are like assholes we all got''em, some just stink worse than others, and your is pretty dam fowl from where i stand. Beisdes Im half Chactaw Indian, the african tribe chiefs were the biggest profiteers of black slavery not the whites nor anyone else. So dont come in here trying to sale your rewriten history BS
So you think we should be proud of people who thought Blacks were 3/5ths of a person? Is this similar to your views?
They couldnt have gotten the free labor had it not been sold to them????question maybe who approached who to sale who????"Socialist history rewriter"
Oh I'm sorry, did Thomas Jefferson not own slaves?
Did women not have the right to vote until 1920?
Did black men not have the right to vote under after the Civil War?
Did Slavery not exist until during the Civil War?
Did the Jim Crow laws not occur?
How about segeration in the schools?
How about the Government killing mass amounts of Indians off their land and relocating them to the worst spots in this country?
Ever hear of the "Trail of Tears"?
And this made me go W-T-F:
"Beisdes Im half Chactaw Indian, the african tribe chiefs were the biggest profiteers of black slavery not the whites nor anyone else. So dont come in here trying to sale your rewriten history BS"
So because your part Indian, I'm suppose to be wrong? If I'm half black, does that make you wrong?
African tribe chiefs did profit off selling some of their people, but Whites were certainly the ones who ended up profiting the most in the end. They were the ones who got the free labor to run the plantations.
It's not rewritten history, the facts are there. You just decide not to listen to it.
Which is why HRC won so soundly over Obama, despite the fact that the polls said something differently, right?
Oh...wait....
If the Bradley effect was real, it would have shown up in the Democratic Primaries. There is no evidence it did. You can keep on hoping, but that shit ain't real.
Forgot to mention that too. They weren't even counted as people.
So you think we should be proud of people who thought Blacks were 3/5ths of a person? Is this similar to your views?