Shareprofit
Platinum Member
- Aug 25, 2021
- 1,397
- 723
- 928
Everywhere, you need to read msm.they are? where's climate changed?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Everywhere, you need to read msm.they are? where's climate changed?
nice, now post the percentage of each in the air
The technology is different now to what it was then, so yes more people are dying from CC than a few years ago. Not sure if you realise there is more World than just America.
You gave me a link to WUW which is proven climate denying BS.No the data covers the entire planet you lazy ass!
I gave you the link to EMDAT which is based in EUROPE!
Welcome to the EM-DAT website
In 1988, the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) launched the Emergency Events Database (EM-DAT). EM-DAT was created with the initial support of the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Belgian Government.
The main objective of the database is to serve the purposes of humanitarian action at national and international levels. The initiative aims to rationalise decision making for disaster preparedness, as well as provide an objective base for vulnerability assessment and priority setting.
EM-DAT contains essential core data on the occurrence and effects of over 22,000 mass disasters in the world from 1900 to the present day. The database is compiled from various sources, including UN agencies, non-governmental organisations, insurance companies, research institutes and press agencies.
You gave me a link to WUW which is proven climate denying BS.
You want me to prove your claim? I don’t believe in itShow me evidence the extra CO2 is not causing global warming. It should be easy for you.
So post something that’s evidence to challenge the site?You gave me a link to WUW which is proven climate denying BS.
A weatherman is more qualified than algore or greta the brain damaged swedeA weather man is not a "leading climate scientist".
Not by a long shot
Name oneA weather man is not a "leading climate scientist".
Not by a long shot
So post something that’s evidence to challenge the site?
It must be simple enough for you, prove to me the climate is not changing because of man's GHG emissions.You want me to prove your claim? I don’t believe in it
So what's this about?WUWT linked to EMDT website now I bypass WUWT to use EMDAT website itself and still you reply idiotically.
The data is from EMDAT an INTERNATIONAL database based in Belgium.
EMDAT website you keep avoiding.
No counterpoint then......
Who is paying you to be this stupid?
No, you have to prove it isIt must be simple enough for you, prove to me the climate is not changing because of man's GHG emissions.
I have several times.No, you have to prove it is
So what's this about?
- Heavy Precipitation. In recent years, a higher percentage of precipitation in the United States has come in the form of intense single-day events. The prevalence of extreme single-day precipitation events remained fairly steady between 1910 and the 1980s but has risen substantially since then. Nationwide, nine of the top 10 years for extreme one-day precipitation events have occurred since 1996. The occurrence of abnormally high annual precipitation totals (as defined by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) has also increased" Climate Change Indicators: Weather and Climate | US EPA
You concede huh?It must be simple enough for you, prove to me the climate is not changing because of man's GHG emissions.
I have several times.
Where?I have several times.
I have not, it's cherry picked that's why WUW frauds quote it. There's plenty of scientific evidence that says the opposite some of which I have posted.You are deflecting from something else don't bother doing it again.
You have now failed to counter the EMDAT data thus you are now refuted.
The Death rate has plummeted over 90% in 100 years a fact you will have to accept.
Cheers.