Clinton suggests she'd consider mandatory gun buy-backs, sparking fears of ‘confiscation’

[Campbell]

Clinton suggests she'd consider mandatory gun buy-backs, sparking fears of ‘confiscation’


I will vote for Hillary but this looks like a pure political statement and frankly it's difficult to understand what someone on her team was thinking. Gun Buy-Back??

I own three guns and if I want to sell them I'll run an ad in the local newspaper or post them on E-Bay like all the other "Gun Nuts" do.

The fact of the matter is that I intend to give them to my favorite son-in-law.

You'll vote for the hil even when she confiscates your weapons.

You dumbass....the buy back would be an offer. One wouldn't have to accept it. That's how Fox News, NRA horse shit gets started. You people need to find something to do besides bad mouth Liberals and Liberal policies.

Clinton suggests mandatory gun buy backs. Mandatory. You're not real bright and a lot dumber than I had originally thought.

You're right! My bad. Usually you Fox News watchers have your right wing heads so far up your ass you can't breathe.

Hillary's bad wrong on that and she might pay for it in lost votes.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Fears of confiscation? If it's mandatory, then how is that not confiscation?

Its not mandatory...Actually its not anything. The thread title says right there someone thinks Clinton SUGGESTED something. Not that they did anything.

I suspect you know the difference

 

[easyt65]

She said her 'confiscation plan' would be similar to Australia's buy-back plan:

The 1996 "National Firearms Buyback Scheme" took 660,959 long guns, mostly semi-automatic rimfire rifles and shotguns as well as pump-action shotguns, and a smaller proportion of higher powered or military type semi-automatic rifles at a cost of $500 million....

Anyone care to do the math on how much it would cost the US govt to 'buy-back' the number of guns in the US if it cost Australia $500 Million for just 660,959 guns?

And the reason she calls it her 'confiscation' plan is after the initial 'buy back doesn't work, the only way she is getting the rest of the guns is to TAKE them. Good luck doing that without bloodshed / a civil war!

 

[ClosedCaption]

She said her 'confiscation plan' would be similar to Australia's buy-back plan:

I'd bet money she never uttered these words

 

[g5000]

I have my doubts the person who asked Clinton the question about gun buybacks told her the Australian version was compulsory, and she probably didn't know it, either.

Cities have been doing gun buybacks for the past three decades, and they are not compulsory. That is probably what Clinton was using as her frame of reference.

I would need to see the actual transcript of the exchange between the town hall attendee and Clinton before I was convinced she supports compulsory buybacks.

If she does support them, then she is an extremely dangerous person.

 

[skookerasbil]

Clinton suggests she'd consider mandatory gun buy-backs, sparking fears of ‘confiscation’


I will vote for Hillary but this looks like a pure political statement and frankly it's difficult to understand what someone on her team was thinking. Gun Buy-Back??

I own three guns and if I want to sell them I'll run an ad in the local newspaper or post them on E-Bay like all the other "Gun Nuts" do.

The fact of the matter is that I intend to give them to my favorite son-in-law.

If she becomes President you won't have a choice...she will appoint 2-3 Supreme Court Justices. Possibly replacing the one vote protecting gun rights...if that happens....guns will no lomger be a Right. and if she passes universal background checks....you will be required by law to bring your son in law to a gun store to do a background check....if you give the guns to him without one you could both be felons.

s0n..........you have the IQ of a handball.

If there are 9 supreme court justices who think like Saul Alinsky, still nobody is going to comply. Go look at how effective the NY SAFE Act was!! Or the same law passed in Ct. after Sandy Hook. They banned "assault weapons".....made it law that these "assault weapons" needed to be registered. How many gun owners complied?

3% - 4% s0n!!!!





nobody cares

 

[skookerasbil]

NY Citizens Show Non-Compliance Resistance To New Gun Ban - Freedom Outpost


Low SAFE Act numbers hint at non-compliance in New York



duh

 

[skookerasbil]

Progressives are beyond clueless on guns..........fringe to the nth degree >>

Record number of Americans oppose handgun ban


In 2015, gun grabbers are politically irrelevant!!

 

[2aguy]

Clinton suggests she'd consider mandatory gun buy-backs, sparking fears of ‘confiscation’


I will vote for Hillary but this looks like a pure political statement and frankly it's difficult to understand what someone on her team was thinking. Gun Buy-Back??

I own three guns and if I want to sell them I'll run an ad in the local newspaper or post them on E-Bay like all the other "Gun Nuts" do.

The fact of the matter is that I intend to give them to my favorite son-in-law.

If she becomes President you won't have a choice...she will appoint 2-3 Supreme Court Justices. Possibly replacing the one vote protecting gun rights...if that happens....guns will no lomger be a Right. and if she passes universal background checks....you will be required by law to bring your son in law to a gun store to do a background check....if you give the guns to him without one you could both be felons.

s0n..........you have the IQ of a handball.

If there are 9 supreme court justices who think like Saul Alinsky, still nobody is going to comply. Go look at how effective the NY SAFE Act was!! Or the same law passed in Ct. after Sandy Hook. They banned "assault weapons".....made it law that these "assault weapons" needed to be registered. How many gun owners complied?

3% - 4% s0n!!!!





nobody cares

A lot of innocent people will go to jail…...

 

[SwimExpert]

Fears of confiscation? If it's mandatory, then how is that not confiscation?

Its not mandatory...Actually its not anything. The thread title says right there someone thinks Clinton SUGGESTED something. Not that they did anything.

I suspect you know the difference

I never said that Clinton was confiscating guns. I said that a mandatory buy-back would de facto amount to obligatory confiscation, on account that it would allow no other lawful option. In short, you are making a straw man, and thus an illogical, argument.

But I suspect you don't know the difference.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Fears of confiscation? If it's mandatory, then how is that not confiscation?

Its not mandatory...Actually its not anything. The thread title says right there someone thinks Clinton SUGGESTED something. Not that they did anything.

I suspect you know the difference

I never said that Clinton was confiscating guns. I said that a mandatory buy-back would de facto amount to obligatory confiscation, on account that it would allow no other lawful option.

Yeah, ok...I think it's clear what you tried to do. You asked about fears of confiscation and jumped to the idea that it (the thing about confiscation that doesn't exist) Ir's mandatory.

In short, you are making a straw man, and thus an illogical, argument.

But I suspect you don't know the difference.

Yeah yeah, I know...

 

[SwimExpert]

Fears of confiscation? If it's mandatory, then how is that not confiscation?

Its not mandatory...Actually its not anything. The thread title says right there someone thinks Clinton SUGGESTED something. Not that they did anything.

I suspect you know the difference

I never said that Clinton was confiscating guns. I said that a mandatory buy-back would de facto amount to obligatory confiscation, on account that it would allow no other lawful option.

Yeah, ok...I think it's clear what you tried to do. You asked about fears of confiscation and jumped to the idea that it (the thing about confiscation that doesn't exist) Ir's mandatory.

In short, you are making a straw man, and thus an illogical, argument.

But I suspect you don't know the difference.

Yeah yeah, I know...

Folks, this is why education funding is so important. Morons like ^^^this guy^^^ use the internet all the time, and they can scarcely read.

 

[Campbell]

Fears of confiscation? If it's mandatory, then how is that not confiscation?

Its not mandatory...Actually its not anything. The thread title says right there someone thinks Clinton SUGGESTED something. Not that they did anything.

I suspect you know the difference

I never said that Clinton was confiscating guns. I said that a mandatory buy-back would de facto amount to obligatory confiscation, on account that it would allow no other lawful option.

Yeah, ok...I think it's clear what you tried to do. You asked about fears of confiscation and jumped to the idea that it (the thing about confiscation that doesn't exist) Ir's mandatory.

In short, you are making a straw man, and thus an illogical, argument.

But I suspect you don't know the difference.

Yeah yeah, I know...

Folks, this is why education funding is so important. Morons like ^^^this guy^^^ use the internet all the time, and they can scarcely read.

You wanna Talk "Ultra Stupid?

 

[SwimExpert]

Fears of confiscation? If it's mandatory, then how is that not confiscation?

Its not mandatory...Actually its not anything. The thread title says right there someone thinks Clinton SUGGESTED something. Not that they did anything.

I suspect you know the difference

I never said that Clinton was confiscating guns. I said that a mandatory buy-back would de facto amount to obligatory confiscation, on account that it would allow no other lawful option.

Yeah, ok...I think it's clear what you tried to do. You asked about fears of confiscation and jumped to the idea that it (the thing about confiscation that doesn't exist) Ir's mandatory.

In short, you are making a straw man, and thus an illogical, argument.

But I suspect you don't know the difference.

Yeah yeah, I know...

Folks, this is why education funding is so important. Morons like ^^^this guy^^^ use the internet all the time, and they can scarcely read.

You wanna Talk "Ultra Stupid?

*facepalm*

 

[Campbell]

Its not mandatory...Actually its not anything. The thread title says right there someone thinks Clinton SUGGESTED something. Not that they did anything.

I suspect you know the difference

I never said that Clinton was confiscating guns. I said that a mandatory buy-back would de facto amount to obligatory confiscation, on account that it would allow no other lawful option.

Yeah, ok...I think it's clear what you tried to do. You asked about fears of confiscation and jumped to the idea that it (the thing about confiscation that doesn't exist) Ir's mandatory.

In short, you are making a straw man, and thus an illogical, argument.

But I suspect you don't know the difference.

Yeah yeah, I know...

Folks, this is why education funding is so important. Morons like ^^^this guy^^^ use the internet all the time, and they can scarcely read.

You wanna Talk "Ultra Stupid?

*facepalm*

Don't blister your cheeks!!

 

[ClosedCaption]

Fears of confiscation? If it's mandatory, then how is that not confiscation?

Its not mandatory...Actually its not anything. The thread title says right there someone thinks Clinton SUGGESTED something. Not that they did anything.

I suspect you know the difference

I never said that Clinton was confiscating guns. I said that a mandatory buy-back would de facto amount to obligatory confiscation, on account that it would allow no other lawful option.

Yeah, ok...I think it's clear what you tried to do. You asked about fears of confiscation and jumped to the idea that it (the thing about confiscation that doesn't exist) Ir's mandatory.

In short, you are making a straw man, and thus an illogical, argument.

But I suspect you don't know the difference.

Yeah yeah, I know...

Folks, this is why education funding is so important. Morons like ^^^this guy^^^ use the internet all the time, and they can scarcely read.

You're not slick, everyone can see what you were trying to do. You cant cover that up with lame "look at this guy" responses.

 

[Dan Daly]

ISIS doesn't start gun control policies, it strips everyone outside of their ranks from owning guns. That's a tad different than banning fully automatic weapons and creating a working background check system. To say it's the same thing is ridiculous.

pssst...fully automatic weapons have been highly regulated by the government since the National Firearms Act of 1934.

What even more ridiculous than people like you who are ignorant of the facts of an issue they are mouthing off about, are people like you who fail to learn the lessons of history. Incrementalism...look it up, then read some books...if reading more than 30 second sound bites isn't too much for you.

 

[Dan Daly]

This notion that all people are potential criminals and terrorists until certified otherwise by government is totalitarianism at its finest.

In free countries, free people are considered to be responsible, law-abiding citizens by default, no government certification and background checking required.

This country is obviously becoming infested with totalitarians and their toadies.

 

[HappyJoy]

ISIS doesn't start gun control policies, it strips everyone outside of their ranks from owning guns. That's a tad different than banning fully automatic weapons and creating a working background check system. To say it's the same thing is ridiculous.

pssst...fully automatic weapons have been highly regulated by the government since the National Firearms Act of 1934.

What even more ridiculous than people like you who are ignorant of the facts of an issue they are mouthing off about, are people like you who fail to learn the lessons of history. Incrementalism...look it up, then read some books...if reading more than 30 second sound bites isn't too much for you.

Funny, I don't believe I said fully automatic weapons were just recently banned. However, it is still a form of gun control. dur!

 

[Rustic]

At least with the current news cycle, the stupidity of more gun control has all but faded... A good start.
More gun laws have been proven to be a no-go for realistic Common sense solutions.... Sh!t happens.

The sooner the media fully drops this non-issue the better off the country will be. More laws weaken the country...

The goal of socialism IS communism.
-Vladimir Lenin-