- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,329
- 28,275
- 2,180
no it doesn't. It is just a list of names. What is the importance to the list other than there are scientist that deny global warming? So what?Speaks for itself.point?Let's have a closer look at the "experts" and "scientists" who claim to dispute the facts of global climate change.Climate change deniers prefer sources like these.....And that is not even the half of it.. Moyers failed at each one of his assertions.
Reality 8
Moyers 0
Meet The Climate Denial Machine Blog Media Matters for America
You warmer wackos are stuck in logical fallacy....the source is meaningless. If the data is wrong, then prove it is wrong. Do you think the wacko warmist web sites are any less bias? Skeptical science for instance is a regular link from you guys and they are the most manipulative and dishonest bunch of seamstress out there. They get debunked on a regular basis not by simply complaining about them as a source, but by providing actual data that proves them wrong. How about climate progress....350.org, and the list could continue ad nauseum....do you really think they are not biased? Till you get past being stuck in logical fallacy mode, you really don't have a chance...of course, being on the wrong side of the argument won't help even if you ever come up with an argument that isn't fallacious....the data and reality is waiting to shoot you down if you ever try an actual argument.
Global Warming Deniers Database